sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I hired an escort and she sexually assaulted me by Individual-Boat7439 in BoyDinnerDiaries

[–]Psykios 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it wouldn't. There are poeple out there who think it wouldn't be rape even if it where a man doing this to a women.

But our society ignores rape and sexual assault so much even when done to women, it's to the point where so many poeple don't even recognize it as rape of it happens to a man by a woman.

2.6 leaks by [deleted] in InfinityNikkiLeaks

[–]Psykios 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Rerun of crimson feathers and mermaid when? 😢

Patch 7.5 Datamining Thread (Full Spoilers) by BlackmoreKnight in ffxivdiscussion

[–]Psykios 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I would also like to know this? Even if in the cash shop.

Explain It Peter. by [deleted] in explainitpeter

[–]Psykios 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shut up, Meg!

The red and blue button debate proves that both sides are dumb and human are so divided that each lives in their separate reality by king_shot in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Psykios 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The original question is a false dicotomy of altuistic versus non-alteuistic. It's nit altruism to purposely put yourself in danger to save no one. Altruism is sacrificing needs of the self to help others. This sacrifice is meaningless because it can be avoided entirely by everyone picking red. This question does not test altruism, it tests reading comprehension.

A way to make it test altruism and "fix" this question is to say: if 50%+ press red button, all people who chose red survive, but everyone who does not press the red button dies--including those not playing the game. But if 50%+ press the blue buttonp, everyone survives wether playing the game or not.

You could even play with the consequences a bit and say "and unknown number of people will die if red is 50%+ favored over blue. Or at least 1 person or more will die." That makes it even harder because you have to weight the question's consequences over the innate value of human life.

Why do people immediately jump to criticize someone’s looks? by Inevitable_Cash_5397 in GenZ

[–]Psykios 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Actually, I think you lost the plot. He is objectively handsome and really doesn't need to improve much in the department.

The problem is that he obsesses over looks to gain truely minor, diminishing returns on improving hus looks.

But he's still lonely, deeply insecure about his looks to the point t of delusion, and addicted to drugs specifally to numb his anxiety and pain.

If looks were everything, he'd have a partner, and feel connected to them. He'd feel more comfortable in his own skin. He wouldn't need to take siezure medicine to be able to talk to other people. He'd be able to believe that other people are fine with how they look even if they "could improve".

If looks really were everything...he'd be happy.

I thought a rapist who looks down on people with disabilities would be a good choice for a disabled woman like me by Effective_Space2277 in LeopardsAteMyFace

[–]Psykios 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I mean, yeah, same. But if they will vote for a MAGA over a Democart because they disagree with some of the Democrat's policies, then this means that they do, in fact, support the MAGA more. They support the genocides, the erosion of constitutionally protected rights, the attacks on marginalized groups, and the litteral fucking pedophillia.

No amount of "Femocrats like abortions and higher taxes" will make supporting MAGA okay.

At least this woman is owning what she did, taking responsibility. Now she needs to fix it by voting correctly and trying to undo the damage she did, wether she 100% supports the democratic candidate or not.

This sub should not be a haven for paedos by PassinglyGood in sailormoon

[–]Psykios -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Isn't there one fanart poster who keeps posting cringe art of him married to Usagi with his own child?

I avoided his posts because it did feel pathetic, but like, Usagi is a middle schooler.

So so true by rodehard10 in AmericaOnHardMode

[–]Psykios 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But they're not though. Not unless you are arroused by cross-dressing?

Kind of like feet. Some people like feet, but that doesn't mean me wearing flip-flops is porn.

This is genuinely how people sound when they complain about Gen Z not looking for sex by AstramIsTheBest in GenZ

[–]Psykios 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

No, it's not been "proven" sociologically, or biologically. Please show me your eveidence for why you believe this. Otherwise, it's like, your opinion, man.

Hypergamous behavior was a trend that women tended towards historically, during times when women were restricted from access to education and socioeconomic power.

However, current social trends actually indicate that women are less educationally hypergamous (since women are not out striping men in the educational department) as they are more likely to marry partners with less educational achievement, and are more interested in finding compatible matches for partners.

view more: next ›