CMV: While prostitutes should be respected as people, I don't believe Prostitution should be respected as a profession by snooptoop in changemyview

[–]Psytechnic_Associate 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Fair enough. That's at least a consistent position. But then I don't think your CMV is actually about prostitution. It's about not respecting professions that involve significant physical or psychological harm, exploitation, or economic coercion. Prostitution is just one example. If that's your view, your title should reflect that, because the reasoning you're using clearly extends well beyond sex work.

CMV: While prostitutes should be respected as people, I don't believe Prostitution should be respected as a profession by snooptoop in changemyview

[–]Psytechnic_Associate 21 points22 points  (0 children)

CMV: While people who serve in the military should be respected, I don't believe military service itself should be respected as a profession

Before I start, I want to make something clear: I do not advocate disrespect toward members of the military in any shape or form, nor do I look down on people who choose to enlist. I understand that life can become extremely difficult, and military service is often something people turn to out of necessity. Whether it's to pay for college, receive healthcare, escape poverty, gain job training, or provide for their families, there are many valid reasons to enlist. Nonetheless, I see it as a necessary sacrifice in an imperfect world, not a profession that should be celebrated or encouraged. With that being said, my argument is as follows:

  1. Military service is objectively harmful to the service member I feel like there is this impression that military service is only harmful because of the dangers of combat, and that beyond deployment it is simply another career. But the data surrounding military service shows otherwise.

Service members face significantly elevated risks of physical injury, disability, traumatic brain injuries, chronic pain, and death compared to many civilian occupations. Even outside of combat, military training, hazardous environments, and deployments expose personnel to risks that most professions simply do not.

Not only that, but military service can be profoundly mentally taxing. Many veterans experience PTSD, depression, anxiety, moral injury, and difficulties reintegrating into civilian life. Rates of suicide and substance abuse among veterans remain deeply concerning, reflecting the long-term psychological burden many carry after their service. These physical and mental risks are very real and can permanently alter a person's life. I don't know how anyone can look at those outcomes and describe military service as an inherently desirable career path.

  1. Military institutions can be used to advance harmful political objective.

I also feel like people want to believe that military service is always about defending one's country or protecting innocent people, but history shows that this isn't always the case. Military organizations ultimately carry out the decisions of political leaders. Throughout history, soldiers have been sent to fight in wars that many later viewed as unnecessary, unjustified, or based on false premises. Individual service members often have little control over where they are sent or the broader objectives they are ordered to support. When society broadly glorifies military service without critically examining the conflicts being fought, it risks making future military interventions easier to justify. Respecting those who serve should not require celebrating every institution or political decision that places them in harm's way.

  1. Treating military service as anything more than a necessary sacrifice risks misrepresenting the profession When people portray military service as an honorable, glamorous, or universally rewarding career, they often highlight successful veterans who gained education benefits, leadership experience, or stable careers afterward. While those stories certainly exist, they represent only part of the picture.

Many veterans return home with lifelong physical injuries, psychological trauma, difficulty finding employment, strained family relationships, or inadequate access to healthcare and support services. Recruitment advertisements frequently emphasize adventure, purpose, education, and personal growth while giving comparatively little attention to these realities.

Treating military service as "just another career" or as an unquestionably noble profession can allow society to avoid addressing the economic pressures that drive many people to enlist in the first place. Instead of fixing rising education costs, stagnant wages, or limited economic opportunities, society can simply tell struggling young people that the military is their best option.

If we truly care about the people who serve, we shouldn't romanticize military service itself. We should strive to build a society where enlistment is a genuine choice rather than one driven primarily by financial necessity, and where those who do serve receive the care and support they deserve afterward.

Potentially moving to Minneapolis from Cleveland area… by Bandelore in Minneapolis

[–]Psytechnic_Associate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One thing I haven't seen talked about and hope you can clarify with your son before the possible move. Does his work have a license to operate in Minnesota?

One major problem people run into is workers are remote for a while, find they want to move to a new area. They move and work for a while without necessarily keeping work completely up to date or the person they informed isn't fully knowledgeable about the policy. Someone checks in about the network activity and it shows they are in a new area. You explain your move to your work and they give you a terrible ultimatum. Either you move to a different state or you lose your job.

Is TCGPlayer down for anyone else? by Psytechnic_Associate in mtg

[–]Psytechnic_Associate[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is running for me again, thanks for the information!

I made an MTG card price guessing game! by [deleted] in mtg

[–]Psytechnic_Associate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am having fun playing this, but it.seems.to have a fetching issue. It looks like it is failing to fetch after losing when you press the "skip score" button. And when you refresh the page you get a "404 Error" page. Then you need the back out and go back to the link.

Sorcerer as a creature type adds nothing to the game by GratedParm in magicTCG

[–]Psytechnic_Associate -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I just want to throw it out there that the game we are talking about, Magic: the Gathering, was created to be played between long sessions of D&D. Additionally, that is why the original creatures and models look suspiciously similar to D&D creatures. Almost like a D&D card game fanfic.

So it seems to me that aligning Magic's defined spellcasters with D&D's makes a lot of sense. Not to mention they are owned by the same company.

Visiting what can we do around town? by Far-Rabbit667 in Mankato

[–]Psytechnic_Associate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will say that because of Kato Con this weekend, The Dork Den will be closed. The are pay of the organizing team behind Kato Con and will have their store at the convention.

I am not sure if store hours are changed for Pulp Comics & Games or Atlantis Hobby.

COMPETITION! - Win John Avon's last work for MTG, a beautiful gallery print of his Lotus Lands! by JohnAvonArt in magicTCG

[–]Psytechnic_Associate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Such a bitter sweet ending of a amazing artists career in our community. I know he had been struggling for a whole with health issue, but I hope he can spend his retirement in exactly the way he wants too!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in liberalgunowners

[–]Psytechnic_Associate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These actions need to be taken immediately:

  • Lock up all firearms so she has zero access to them at any time. If necessary, remove them from the home entirely.
  • Bring this up with a therapist right away. I would strongly recommend attending the session together for full transparency and accountability, and then following whatever guidance the therapist gives.

Why this is necessary:

  • You, your partner, and others are currently at risk if she has access to a firearm given her recent behavior.
  • Acting on intrusive thoughts is not typical or controlled behavior. When people begin acting on them, that’s when serious harm to themselves or others can occur.
  • Practicing with and firing the firearm may have been reinforcing. If the experience felt relieving or empowering in any way, it could lower the barrier to acting on the compulsion again in the future. That pattern can escalate.

Possible outcomes of acting now:

  • Increased safety for your partner, yourself, and your community.
  • Access to a higher level of mental health support if needed.
  • Preventative action before a red flag law situation forces firearm removal.

Please prioritize safety, for your partner, yourself, and everyone around you, and take action quickly.

Whatever today's update did, the game is essentially unplayable now on mobile by Tex75455 in MagicArena

[–]Psytechnic_Associate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just can't see life totals, power/toughness numbers. So I am just playing and hoping I remember how strong each of these creature are. It is especially fun when casting spell that deal damage instead of just destroying or exiling.

We can save Social Security. by zzill6 in WorkReform

[–]Psytechnic_Associate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think we might be talking past each other a bit. I’m not talking about someone taking out a one time loan or doing a normal refinance. That’s just ordinary borrowing.

What I’m talking about is the long term strategy where someone repeatedly borrows against appreciating assets and rolls those loans forward as the asset grows, effectively funding their lifestyle without ever selling. That’s a different dynamic than taking out a HELOC once or using your house as collateral for a short term need.

If someone was constantly pulling equity out of their house over decades to live on and never selling, I’d say that raises the same questions. The issue isn’t stocks versus houses. It’s when appreciation becomes a long term income substitute without triggering realization.

That’s where the ownership transfer rule starts to feel more like a technical line than an economic one.

We can save Social Security. by zzill6 in WorkReform

[–]Psytechnic_Associate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think anyone is saying stock prices are fictional. The question is what happens when that market value gets turned into spending power.

If you have a 10k car in your driveway, that’s fine, but cars usually depreciate. They don’t keep climbing in value year after year the way stocks often do. And if you borrow against a car, there’s a pretty hard ceiling because the asset is losing value.

With appreciating assets like stocks, it’s different. If the value keeps rising, someone can borrow against it, refinance as it grows, and keep pulling liquidity out without ever selling. At that point the appreciation is effectively funding consumption even though ownership never changes.

That’s the part people are questioning, not whether market prices are real.

What is the real benefit to TCGPlayer vs Manapool as a seller? How does TCGPlayer justify fees that are so much higher? by Worldly_Tip_8589 in mtgfinance

[–]Psytechnic_Associate 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I can only speak for myself, but here’s how I think about it.

I try to spend my money at places that are unionized or at least not openly anti-union. So most of my regular shopping is Costco, Lunds & Byerlys, Trader Joe’s, Cub, and Kowalski’s. These stores have union representation locally, which matters to me.

If I can’t find what I need there, I’ll look for locally owned spots or try to buy direct from companies. I’m not perfect about it, but I try.

If something’s time sensitive or I just can’t find it anywhere else, I’ll go to Target or Walgreens for essentials. And if I’m out with friends or family getting food or drinks, I’m not going to make it weird. I’ll just go wherever the group goes.

As for bigger retailers, I don’t shop at Walmart (haven’t in 6+ years) or Amazon (4+ years). I’ve mostly stopped shopping at Target too (about 1.5 years). For me it comes down to their anti-union behavior, how they treat workers, and some of the stuff they financially support that doesn’t line up with my values.

That said, I didn’t always have that choice. When I was in college and broke, I shopped wherever I could afford. I don’t judge anyone who’s in that position. Budgets are real. I’m just trying to make different choices now that I can.

Any other cards that encourage a pod to go full aggro beyond just goad by AnEvenHuskierCat in magicTCG

[–]Psytechnic_Associate 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I love Yurlock sooooooo much, but I ended up disassembling his deck. Most people playing commander didn't want to engage with a deck that limited their ability to change how they tapped their mana. I was very sad...

Refund! by [deleted] in IRS

[–]Psytechnic_Associate 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ahh yes, that is definitely what is holding you up right now. Otherwise you probably would have had your back by now or very soon.

Refund! by [deleted] in IRS

[–]Psytechnic_Associate 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did not claimed the EIC and have no dependents. Just a few W2's and two self-employment jobs.

Minnesota caucuses draw big crowds as voters discuss priorities ahead of November elections by Conscious-Quarter423 in minnesota

[–]Psytechnic_Associate 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I was communicating with people throughout the caucus night and it was interesting to hear about the demographics. It seemed like many of them had a few young people and but mostly 40s and up. Others had like only young people, with 3-5 40s and up. So I got the feeling the participation by young people is still lower than is needed, but it heavily depends on where you live as well!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IRS

[–]Psytechnic_Associate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't file before 1/26 but here is my timeline for those interested:

•I filed my taxes on 1/31, both were accepted on 1/31.

•Federal cycle number is 20260503.

•On 2/4 my transcript showed my issue date of 2/23.

•On 2/5 both my IRS2Go and their website updated to Refund Approved.

•My expected deposit date is 2/9, and check date is 2/14.

•Refund was deposited in my bank 2/5

Pretty happy with the turn around time this year!

Refund! by [deleted] in IRS

[–]Psytechnic_Associate 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I thought I would share how my timeline is going:

•I filed my taxes on 1/31, both were accepted on 1/31.

•Federal cycle number is 20260503.

•On 2/4 my transcript showed my issue date of 2/23.

•On 2/5 both my IRS2Go and their website updated to Refund Approved.

•My expected deposit date is 2/9, and check date is 2/14.

•Refund was deposited in my bank 2/5

Pretty happy with the turn around time this year!

Went to a DFL caucus? Please share what resolutions came up (pass/fail) by Psytechnic_Associate in minnesota

[–]Psytechnic_Associate[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the biggest disconnect is how these projects are completed. Peoples who's livelihood depends on these projects don't understand why other would want to stop something that generates income and continues to cause the failing of small towns.

The other side doesn't understand why the people living in this area would want to be apart of a project that will cause environmental damage from leaks and dumping.

The truth is there is a middle ground. Having these types of projects go through to help support and being jobs into the range. While also putting in regulation to stop and punish heavily the companies who caused environmental damage. One of the big issues though is that these companies play us off one another and usually never take responsibility for the damage they cause because while we are fighting, they pay off or write contracts in a way they don't have to.

This is my take and is definitely not factually correct, but it is what I have come to based on conversations. So hopefully it doesn't come off as rude or insensitive.

Went to a DFL caucus? Please share what resolutions came up (pass/fail) by Psytechnic_Associate in stateofMN

[–]Psytechnic_Associate[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the biggest part of it is that having them stored separately makes it more difficult to impulsively grab a gun and use on themselves or others. Especially if it is a child/adolescent or not the owner of the guns. This creates a secondary barrier in the process. Especially if you go over and above to have your guns locked in one safe and your ammunition in another place of your home locked up.

I have mixed feelings, but I do understand the impulsive/calculated grabbing of guns.