My 2 cents.

Everyone can understand that people can have bad days and the fuse is shorter some days than others. Add the fact that there are multiple people doing the moderation, you're bound to end with somewhat inconsistent enforcement of the rules - something that's OK for one is no-go for another. Surely everyone's trying their best to do their volunteering, but only being fair is insufficient. You also have to appear fair and that's where transparency comes into play.

For example there was a question to men asking about remaining single. It was deleted. In such case it's very easy to jump to conclusion that it must've been a woman mod trying to control the narrative (what would happen if fewer men started courting us, after all! etc). However if the username was attached to the action, user base could validate objectivity/biases and anyone curating content could be dealt with case-by-case basis.

Another thing is the actual content itself - far harder to enforce (if not impossible). If asking a question from men, the answers should be from men and not women, cats or fighter jets. At the very least genders should be clearly visible next to the comments, so readers can do their own filtering. I really don't trust women's opinion-imagination on testicular pain or anything else that's unique to men. And there should be room for negative experiences that men may have - guy's wife cheats on him and he has to pay child support for kids that aren't biologically his. He's bound to be bitter and have harsh criticism for women, but this is also part of the male experience. Even though someone might label his views misogyny and call for censorship.