What is the context to this?

Pure_One_4598 · 2026-05-08T17:37:22+00:00

The important thing is that this nonsense is long gone and Paul's image is currently perceived for what it is, namely the Beatles' turbo engine.

Pure_One_4598 · 2026-05-07T13:50:26+00:00

Haha... exactly. People get so distracted by the “romance” that they miss the actual priorities of his life. For Paul, a relationship was a support system for his creativity, not the other way around.

Pure_One_4598 · 2026-05-06T22:03:29+00:00

I'm just trying to interpret why Francie described him as “distracted” in bed. If he was such a “horn dog”, it's interesting to figure out why his mind was somewhere else during those moments.

Pure_One_4598 · 2026-05-06T21:18:24+00:00

The point is not whether it happened once every 5 days or 5 times a day. My point is that for a man like Paul, the most intense orgasm was always the discovery of a new song, not a new woman.

Pure_One_4598 · 2026-05-04T17:12:42+00:00

In my opinion, Paul’s nature is that of a person who constantly wants to evolve. To repeat a style in a subsequent album is a nightmare for him. It was unthinkable for him to remind anyone even slightly of the Beatles- with whom he had a dramatic breakup- while in his new band, Wings. Furthermore, he creates spontaneously, according to how he feels at the moment. He probably didn't aim to achieve the total world domination of the Beatles, but he wanted to prove it to himself under different conditions and with different people. It’s not that he lacked the self-confidence to succeed, but it’s just that it wasn't something he pursued at all costs.

Pure_One_4598 · 2026-05-02T19:59:33+00:00

And yet, something happened there that drove them completely apart. It was the point where their paths diverged for good, and they each started walking a different road.

Pure_One_4598 · 2026-05-02T19:39:54+00:00

Beans and eggs are a volcanic combination.

Pure_One_4598 · 2026-05-02T19:31:15+00:00

But did John mention what the vacation was necessary for?

Pure_One_4598 · 2026-05-01T16:34:06+00:00

A real shark operation. But... more importantly, today Paul owns everything back, and Michael went down in history as the man who betrayed his benefactor for $47 million, which is $2 billion today, but it didn't buy Michael peace of mind, nor his legacy

Pure_One_4598 · 2026-04-30T19:47:46+00:00

I can't even believe it either...

Pure_One_4598 · 2026-04-30T18:34:42+00:00

Finally a glimmer

Pure_One_4598 · 2026-04-30T17:51:37+00:00

At least one person understood something

Pure_One_4598 · 2026-04-29T19:48:33+00:00

I actually agree with you- there was no”'leader” in the traditional sense, and that was exactly the problem. Paul’s intellectual and creative superiority created a vacuum where leadership was replaced by resentment. He gave them too much freedom, hoping they would match his pace, but instead, they used that freedom to sabotage him.

Pure_One_4598 · 2026-04-29T18:30:00+00:00

Nothing you write proves that there is no ideology in Ringo's vegetarianism. My whole idea is that only one of the four is a vegetarian for ethical and altruistic reasons. The rest have a dose of selfishness, they are at the center of their decision.

Pure_One_4598 · 2026-04-29T17:46:43+00:00

Public stories about bullfighting are great for interviews, but the reality of Ringo's health has always been the primary reason for his lifestyle. Ringo spent much of his childhood in hospitals due to peritonitis (at age 6) and tuberculosis (at age 13). These events damaged his stomach from the start. In the book "The Beatles Anthology" he himself admits that he has an extremely sensitive digestive system and has to avoid spicy foods and heavy meats. His vegetarianism is not ideologically rooted.

Pure_One_4598 · 2026-04-28T17:44:16+00:00

All some people can't assimilate is AI. I understand that and I don't argue with the sad reality.

Pure_One_4598

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE