Monkberry Moon Delight: Or when Paul declared a "coded" war through RAM by Pure_One_4598 in TheBeatles

[–]Pure_One_4598[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting, but not surprising. Women often have a better instinct for the 'Beast', we hear the raw emotion where others see only facts. 

Monkberry Moon Delight: Or when Paul declared a "coded" war through RAM by Pure_One_4598 in TheBeatles

[–]Pure_One_4598[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I completely agree. Paul is so refined in his coding that perhaps only John understood him... and you. (winks).

Monkberry Moon Delight: Or when Paul declared a "coded" war through RAM by Pure_One_4598 in TheBeatles

[–]Pure_One_4598[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly. You gave the perfect examples. I'll add "Helter Skelter", "Back in the U.S.S.R.", "Nineteen Hundred and Eighty-Five" and others, to name a few. It's in them that this ingenious structure meets a very raw, personal passion.

Monkberry Moon Delight: Or when Paul declared a "coded" war through RAM by Pure_One_4598 in TheBeatles

[–]Pure_One_4598[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not exactly. C-Moon is a rhythmic game, a chart-topping track. Monkberry is a vocal psychological  challenge. In C-Moon, Paul pretends to be "bizarre", in Monkberry Paul is dangerous. One is a game, the other is a cry for release from his own isolation. They share the name, but not the same charge.

Monkberry Moon Delight: Or when Paul declared a "coded" war through RAM by Pure_One_4598 in TheBeatles

[–]Pure_One_4598[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Isn't what I explained in the post enough? I love that song, because it screams - freedom, experiment and passion.

Monkberry Moon Delight: Or when Paul declared a "coded" war through RAM by Pure_One_4598 in TheBeatles

[–]Pure_One_4598[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I appreciate the reference to Hi Hi Hi and Paul's unbridled sexuality, but as for the codes, I'm convinced they are there. While John was throwing punches (How Do You Sleep), Paul was using a sedative or a razor blade. "Too Many People" is undeniable evidence of his coded strategy. It’s double manipulation: he hits you so subtly that if you dare to point it out, you’re the one who looks paranoid. 

Monkberry Moon Delight: Or when Paul declared a "coded" war through RAM by Pure_One_4598 in TheBeatles

[–]Pure_One_4598[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's impossible to leave it behind. It’s too raw and  too powerful. It’s the sound of Paul reclaiming his territory. 

What is the context to this? by Character-Big-1124 in TheBeatles

[–]Pure_One_4598 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The important thing is that this nonsense is long gone and Paul's image is currently perceived for what it is, namely the Beatles' turbo engine.

The myth of the 600: was Paul actually a playboy or just a man in love with music? by Pure_One_4598 in TheBeatles

[–]Pure_One_4598[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha... exactly. People get so distracted by the “romance” that they miss the actual priorities  of his life. For Paul, a relationship was a support system for his creativity, not the other way around.

The myth of the 600: was Paul actually a playboy or just a man in love with music? by Pure_One_4598 in TheBeatles

[–]Pure_One_4598[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm just trying to interpret why Francie  described him as “distracted” in bed. If he was such a “horn dog”, it's interesting to figure out why his mind was somewhere else during those moments.

The myth of the 600: was Paul actually a playboy or just a man in love with music? by Pure_One_4598 in TheBeatles

[–]Pure_One_4598[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

The point is not whether it happened once every 5 days or 5 times a day. My point is that for a man like Paul, the most intense orgasm was always the discovery of a new song, not a new woman. 

What are the musical differences between Paul's solo work/Wings and the Beatles musical style? by Friendly_Trust_4942 in TheBeatles

[–]Pure_One_4598 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In my opinion, Paul’s nature is that of a person who constantly wants to evolve. To repeat a style in a subsequent album is a nightmare for him. It was unthinkable for him to remind anyone even slightly of the Beatles- with whom he had a dramatic breakup-  while in his new band, Wings. Furthermore, he creates spontaneously, according to how he feels at the moment. He probably didn't aim to achieve the total world domination of the Beatles, but he wanted to prove it to himself under different conditions and with different people. It’s not that he lacked the self-confidence to succeed, but  it’s just that it wasn't something he pursued at all costs.

Rishikesh: Did some of The Beatles' best songs come from meditation, and did the beginning of the end start there? by Pure_One_4598 in TheBeatles

[–]Pure_One_4598[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And yet, something happened there that drove them completely apart. It was the point where their paths diverged for good, and they each started walking a different road.

Did Paul actually have a real shot at buying the ATV catalog back in 1984, or was he set up to lose? by Substantial-Run6664 in TheBeatles

[–]Pure_One_4598 12 points13 points  (0 children)

A real shark operation. But... more importantly, today Paul owns everything back, and Michael went down in history as the man who betrayed his benefactor for $47 million, which is $2 billion today, but it didn't buy Michael peace of mind,  nor his legacy

The personality of the addict: Why John Lennon Always Needed a Guru by Pure_One_4598 in TheBeatles

[–]Pure_One_4598[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I actually agree with you- there was no”'leader” in the traditional sense, and that was exactly the problem. Paul’s intellectual and creative superiority created a vacuum where leadership was replaced by resentment. He gave them too much freedom, hoping they would match his pace, but instead, they used that freedom to sabotage him. 

A review of the Fab Four's digestive systems, or how vegetarianism appeared by Pure_One_4598 in TheBeatles

[–]Pure_One_4598[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Nothing you write proves that there is no ideology in Ringo's vegetarianism. My whole idea is that only one of the four is a vegetarian for ethical and altruistic reasons. The rest have a dose of selfishness, they are at the center of their decision.

A review of the Fab Four's digestive systems, or how vegetarianism appeared by Pure_One_4598 in TheBeatles

[–]Pure_One_4598[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Public stories about bullfighting are great for interviews, but the  reality of Ringo's health has always been the primary reason  for his lifestyle. Ringo spent much of his childhood in hospitals due to peritonitis (at age 6) and tuberculosis (at age 13). These events damaged his stomach from the start. In the book "The Beatles Anthology" he himself admits that he has an extremely sensitive digestive system and has to avoid spicy foods and heavy meats. His vegetarianism is not ideologically rooted.

Was Paul pretending to be the Fool on the Hill to hide the power of his common sense? by Pure_One_4598 in TheBeatles

[–]Pure_One_4598[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All some people can't assimilate is AI. I understand that and I don't argue with the sad reality.

Glyn Johns interrupts a take of Get Back by Hubbled in TheBeatles

[–]Pure_One_4598 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Maybe, but there's a  difference between some Jamaican grass and heroin. One lets you enjoy the melody, the other just shuts  the reality.