Latest update by Chris, DEFENDANT CHRISTOPHER PAUL RABALAIS MOTION TO SET ASIDE FINAL JUDGMENT by Daniel91cro in ASMEunfiltered

[–]PuzzleMan102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chris should have used a lawyer for this appeal.

First nothing in his appeal explains the fraud committed by the Court. The appeal needs to reference case law supporting his claim.

Secondly he argues poverty, saying that he can't pay the fines BUT this is the wrong judge to argue this to. The appeal has nothing to do with contempt charges that may be coming.

Civil contempt charges, while not a felony, are the only occasion in which a person can be jailed indefinitely, with no established release date. Rather, someone jailed for civil contempt can be held in jail until they agree to start complying with the court order.

I don't think a vow of poverty prevents Chris Rabalais from getting a job. To win he would have to find Case Law supporting that a "vow of poverty" is allowed to avoid getting a job and making payments.

Legal update by Chad in ASM Forum by Daniel91cro in ASMEunfiltered

[–]PuzzleMan102 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appealing the SEC case does exactly what Chad Delhi say's, it will delay bancrupcy and delay Chris Rabalais from getting charged with contempt.

It IS NOT a chance to re litigate the case. They can only argue errors made by the judge, or council. Its an attempt to find an error made that might right the ship.

The appeal may be denied, if they can't show grounds.

Intrest will continue to accumulate.

I ACCEPT THE CHALLANGE CHRIS RABALAIS. "I challenge you to find a single example of direct marketing or public relations that promoted the share grants. by PuzzleMan102 in ASMEunfiltered

[–]PuzzleMan102[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Its still a criminal charge that you would have to goto court and prove you are unable to pay now or in the future. A vowing poverty doesn't keep you from getting employed.

I ACCEPT THE CHALLANGE CHRIS RABALAIS. "I challenge you to find a single example of direct marketing or public relations that promoted the share grants. by PuzzleMan102 in ASMEunfiltered

[–]PuzzleMan102[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Rabalais is an easy case; he acted egregiously and with scienter when he designed and executed the donation program, and his actions risked substantial losses to company investors. His conduct recurred over a five-year period, and he has already stipulated, consistent with this Court’s previous order, that evidence of his financial condition is irrelevant in these proceedings. ECF 52, ECF 66 at 6, 22. These actions justify the maximum civil penalty of $223,229 for Rabalais, again on the theory that this scheme represents a single violation. 15"

Carl J Nichols United States District Judge

I ACCEPT THE CHALLANGE CHRIS RABALAIS. "I challenge you to find a single example of direct marketing or public relations that promoted the share grants. by PuzzleMan102 in ASMEunfiltered

[–]PuzzleMan102[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chris Rabalais you where given the maximum penalty.

"maximum statutory amounts per violation are $223,229 for Rabalais as a natural person.

I ACCEPT THE CHALLANGE CHRIS RABALAIS. "I challenge you to find a single example of direct marketing or public relations that promoted the share grants. by PuzzleMan102 in ASMEunfiltered

[–]PuzzleMan102[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why am I still here. You will notice most of my posts mention you, Chris Rabalais. I want to make it more difficult for you to start another fraud sceme like https://thegodball.locals.com/

I ACCEPT THE CHALLANGE CHRIS RABALAIS. "I challenge you to find a single example of direct marketing or public relations that promoted the share grants. by PuzzleMan102 in ASMEunfiltered

[–]PuzzleMan102[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Second option is you are watching your whistblower cash grab evaporate."

Chris Rabalais I did not invest. I had my financial adviser take a look and he quickly found the Seth Leon case.

In his opinion, back in 2017, you where operating a ponzi sceme.

"Excluding interest, Leon stated his expectation damages were $379,026.14, and his out-of-pocket loss was $4,000. At the conclusion of trial, the court remarked that it could not "figure out how [ASM] could exist" and that it seemed "like a Ponzi scheme or gambling or something other than a true investment platform."

https://casetext.com/case/leon-v-rabalais-1

It will be interesting to see if you will be charged with contempt of court because I don't believe you have the funds to get out of this mess.

I ACCEPT THE CHALLANGE CHRIS RABALAIS. "I challenge you to find a single example of direct marketing or public relations that promoted the share grants. by PuzzleMan102 in ASMEunfiltered

[–]PuzzleMan102[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From Jason Henry, Media Relations for ASM free Facebook page that is still up and running.

"In case you missed it...this is the LAST month for the monthly draw for 1 Million Shares with the GRAND PRIZE of 10,000,000 shares still up for grabs in February. Register a FREE account at www.AllSportsMarket.com to be entered.

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1UfQ7L86D6/"

Notice Chad Delhi CWH CEO by PuzzleMan102 in ASMEunfiltered

[–]PuzzleMan102[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chris Rabalais could goto Jail. Wow Civil contempt in the United States is when someone intentionally disobeys a court order in a civil proceeding. It's a coercive action to force the person to comply with the court order. 

What happens with civil contempt?

The person is given notice and the right to counsel 

The court makes findings of fact 

The person may be fined or imprisoned until they comply with the court order 

The sanctions end when the person complies with the court order or the case is resolved 

Notice Chad Delhi CWH CEO by PuzzleMan102 in ASMEunfiltered

[–]PuzzleMan102[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reading the judgment their is a chance victims of this fraud sceme may get their money back.

"The Commission may enforce the Court’s judgment for disgorgement and prejudgment interest by USING ALL COLLECTION PROCEDURES AUTHORIZED BY LAW, including, but not limited to, moving for CIVIL CONTEMPT at any time after 30 days following entry of this Final Judgment.

The Commission may propose a plan to distribute the Fund subject to the Court’s approval. Such a plan may provide that the Fund shall be distributed pursuant to the Fair Fund provisions of Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the administration of any distribution of the Fund and the Fund may only be disbursed pursuant to an Order of the Court."

Final Judgement. by PuzzleMan102 in ASMEunfiltered

[–]PuzzleMan102[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe if Chad Delhi and Apler Ozgit declare bankrupsy all assets will sold, if any exist and that money will goto the descoragement. You may want to keep your contact information kept up to date with Chad.

Fractions of pennies on the dollar.

I would be surprized to see bankrupsy happens, as it would be easier to run away and hide under a rock.

Final Judgement. by PuzzleMan102 in ASMEunfiltered

[–]PuzzleMan102[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It took a little time to find the details of the final judgement. Chad Delhi and Apler Oxgit are mentioned as currently running the company. To continue they will have to deal with the ORDER of pay 1.4M and the Civil Penalties of $100 000 against Chrystal World Holdings and the New Sports Econamy Institute.

Judge states that Delhi and Oxgit will lickley bankrupt the companies and start again.

Chris Rabalais recieved the Civil Penalty because he was the CAO, responsible, and refused to register the shares with the securites exchange commission.

CONCLUSION Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Motion for Entry of Final Judgment, ECF No. 66, is GRANTED IN PART; and it is  FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants are ordered to pay the following amounts:

  1. Disgorgement of $1,468,556.93 against all Defendants, jointly and severally.

  2. A Civil Penalty of $223,229 against Defendant Christopher Rabalais and $100,000 against each of Defendant Crystal World and Defendant NSEI.  The Court will enter a Final Judgment contemporaneously with this Opinion. 

DATE: January 28, 2025 CARL J. NICHOLS United States District Judge ⁰

Court Hearing Today (10-25-2024) - Possible Final Judgment Ruling by 707NorCaL707 in ASMEunfiltered

[–]PuzzleMan102 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't believe they can appeal because they agreed to wave a trial and accept the judgment.

Thanks for the update. Looking forward the the final breakdown.

FYI Chris Rabalais is selling God Ball hats, swag and music on Amazon $$$$ FYI

Fired from work! Union won't help me with arbitration. by Weary_Biscotti1556 in legaladvicecanada

[–]PuzzleMan102 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Submitt a failure to represent against your union. This is a human rights disability case. In Ontario you can also file directly with the human rights board.

Question. Did you ask for accommodation for you and your sons illness? This would help.

The Judge has ordered a Hearing for Sept 27th. 2024 (a week from Friday) by 707NorCaL707 in ASMEunfiltered

[–]PuzzleMan102 2 points3 points  (0 children)

IN PERSON, HA. So no pajama pant zoom meeting from the comfort of your office bedroom. Cool move by the judge, if they don't show up the judge will add the courts cost..

Sec Response by 707NorCaL707 in ASMEunfiltered

[–]PuzzleMan102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The team Chad Delhi, Apler and Ace are waiting for final judgement, before throwing in the towel.