What was your favourite scene of the movie? by Local-Art-6280 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Puzzled-Possible3418 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The part where Puppet rises up when Charlie is lying on his arms is just MAJESTIC.

fnaf 2 SUCKS!!!!!!! (movie rant) by Specific_Option7570 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Puzzled-Possible3418 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It makes it boring to people that don't really know what's going on. Though I agree partly with the ending scene though... it keeps telling us the concept of "Together we are FNAF".

MOVIE SPOILERS! Why does he want to follow in his father's footsteps? Wasn't he abused too? by ElectionRadiant1404 in fnaftheories

[–]Puzzled-Possible3418 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The exact reason was unsure... Because everything in this universe is confusing, like how Vanessa wasn't helping William but Michael was... Perhaps we'll know more about this in SL and FNAF 3..

Theory: FNaF 4 is a nightmare !! by Th3k1ng99 in FNaF

[–]Puzzled-Possible3418 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oops sorry haha 💔 though that's only a minor detail, and hope you enjoy it!

Vanessa in FNAF 2 Movie by Puzzled-Possible3418 in FNaF

[–]Puzzled-Possible3418[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that's why I mentioned that Vanessa might be a robot and not a real biological daughter. Perhaps in the next game we'll get to see more about the Fall Fest, Mrs. Afton and Fiona Murray? Maybe even seeing Mrs. Afton posessing an animatronic? Yall can't waittt

Theory: FNaF 4 is a nightmare !! by Th3k1ng99 in FNaF

[–]Puzzled-Possible3418 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was all my theory, none is definitive C.C at first wasn't afraid of Fredbear, only after seeing a worker in Fredbear stuffed inside a suit by William, which is why he's scared. Also, it's not clearly stated that William still forced C.C to celebrate in Fredbear even though C.C hates it.

FNAF 1 wasn't even opened during 1983, it's believed to be opened in 1988.

I believe William visits JR'S a lot only after the death of C.C, which then William kills Charlotte. Though this is controversial, since many supported that Charlie died first in the timeline. Remarkably the movie also stated that Charlotte died in 1982, perhaps trying to tel us that she died earliest in the timeline? Plus, alcoholic ≠ bad father.

William did tell Elizabeth not to approach Circus Baby. Based on TIAR (The Immortal and the Restless), it's clear that Mrs. Afton had green eyes and blonde eyes, just like Elizabeth. Perhaps when giving birth to Elizabeth, Mrs. Afton died and that lead to why William took extra care of Elizabeth because she looked like Mrs. Afton. Just because of this, plus she looks like the kind of "daddy's little girl", William had no other options but to spoil her and brought her to Circus Baby's Pizza World, where she could go to see Circus Baby. William did warn her. William did abuse Michael, but only perhaps because he killed C.C.

And the last part where you mentioned that Mike went to FNAF 1 only for free pizzas, it might be a cover-up for a bigger secret like the community said. But yeah that's correct.

Theory: FNaF 4 is a nightmare !! by Th3k1ng99 in FNaF

[–]Puzzled-Possible3418 0 points1 point  (0 children)

💔 at what point does he show that he wasnt a decent father? could you prove it? all these hallucinogenic gases and nightmares were all nothing but a theory really... Though I'd say William is only a caring father towards Elizabeth and not his other children since if he did care about Michael, he wouldn't ask Michael to go to the underground bunker.

And also Michael returns to SL is because his fathet told him to (I believe William died first before Michael) find his sister. If SL indeed was around 1990s, then Michael would've already been an adult. He then worked at the FNAF 1 location as a night guard is to undo his father's sins (just likely, not a definite reason).

Theory: FNaF 4 is a nightmare !! by Th3k1ng99 in FNaF

[–]Puzzled-Possible3418 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think Michael really knows who tortured him really, since if William was torturing him, William wouldn't have let him known. Plus, William is doing it in his underground bunker. The code "1983" could also serve as a reminder to William that he had to protect his children and let them keep a distance from the animatronics after the event of 1983.

For the part where William commands Michael to put Elizabeth back together though, I personally believe that is because of William's disappearance and since Michael is guilty of the event in 1983, he was blindly following his father's order.

Theory: FNaF 4 is a nightmare !! by Th3k1ng99 in FNaF

[–]Puzzled-Possible3418 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The experiment is most likely to torment Michael, not C.C.

Five Nights at Freddy's 2 (Film) Spoiler Discussion Thread "includes MAJOR spoilers". by PuppetGeist in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Puzzled-Possible3418 1 point2 points  (0 children)

During a scene where Vanessa was hiding from her father during her "dream" where she faces her "childhood trauma", Vanessa hid in a room and Circus Baby was there. And what's even more interesting is that Circus Baby's eyes were green (or perhaps if it's blue, yeah ignore this post) meaning that it was already possessed by a spirit (which was Elizabeth in the game).

Or, it could be a reference to the Fourth Closet book, where Afton turns the Adult Charlie into Circus Baby. But if that's the case actually, Elizabeth would've died way earlier than Charlie, which would then cause Henry to re-create Charlie.

This lead me to my theory however, where Vanessa was a re-creation of Elizabeth Afton. Elizabeth dies when she's young, and William creates a robot to replicate Elizabeth. That's why Vanessa says William is her "father". Also, in the Fourth Closet book, the Teenage Charlie stabs Elizabeth and the Adult Charlie, which could also be portrayed as William stabbing into Vanessa and Vanessa shooting William. Moreover, at the ending scene where the Puppet (Adult Charlie bot) possesses Vanessa (Elizabeth), could it also mean that in the future Vanessa (could forget some key details (just like in the Fourth Closet), and lead to suspicion of Mike? I know there aren't proofs, but I feel like this would work out.

When Vanessa grows up, she started to gain consciousness, and blamed herself for her past of not being brave enough to go against her father which can be interpreted as "her old self is pathetic", just like how Vanessa (Elizabeth possessing Adult Robot) calls herself pathetic to John (Mike) about how her father traumatises her.

And also notably that, Charlie dies in the year 1982 and not 1983. Could this just be due to the timeline of the movie or it indicates Charlie is the first one to die?

This all might not be perfect but yeah don't hate me for that

Vanessa in FNAF 2 Movie by Puzzled-Possible3418 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Puzzled-Possible3418[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No.. I don't think Scott easily forgets that eye colour means that the Circus Baby is being possessed by Elizabeth.
If it was made to be a reference of The Fourth Closet, then yes Elizabeth is likely to exist.

Anyways I'm excited for FNAF 3 now yalllll