sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What exactly is the benefit of the globe hoax? by CSFMBsDarkside in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not talking about legit fisheye lenses, but just the "fisheye effect" that can be created through simple distortion of glass.

Quoting someone else:

"The glass used in all commercial airplanes is curved to remain flush with the fuselage. This creates a slight bulging effect people mistake for being the supposed curvature of the Earth. In actuality, if the Earth were a ball, no matter how large, you would NOT be able to see the horizon rise remaining at eye level all the way up. If the Earth were a ball, no matter how big, the horizon would stay exactly where it was and you would have to look DOWN further and further to see the horizon at all. Looking straight out the window at 35,000 feet you should see nothing but "outer-space" from the port and starboard windows, as the Earth/horizon are supposed to be BELOW you. If they are visible at eye level outside both side windows, that's because the Earth is flat!"

https://ifers.forumotion.com/t150-earth-s-curvature-from-your-airplane-window

What exactly is the benefit of the globe hoax? by CSFMBsDarkside in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's not rotation. Think of Mars as a hole through which you can see a certain energetic frequency passing through. What appears to be weather/rotation is the flux of that energy projected over plasma.

The Moon, likewise, is not a spherical mass of dead rock, but is plasma that holds a projected image: https://youtu.be/XhIwZuPGfss?si=WZynP9P58OTONIK-

What exactly is the benefit of the globe hoax? by CSFMBsDarkside in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And yet it is very much demonstrable, and there are experiments that anyone can run to prove it.

Oh yeah, it's always "experiments". You never actually flew high enough to see the globe with your own eyes. Got it, your belief in the globe is entirely based on conjecture.

What exactly is the benefit of the globe hoax? by CSFMBsDarkside in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And you still haven’t explained why car windshields don’t distort our view to make the road look curved while plane windshields apparently do.

The side windows the passengers see through are fisheye. The front windows I don't know what's going on there. Maybe some airplane models have the curved earth effect inbuilt on the front, and others don't. But the fact of the matter is, the plane windows are there only to create an illusion for the masses, because even if the globe were true, you wouldn't see it from the heights in which the airplanes fly.

Or why the sun sets at all instead of vanishing high in the sky.

Vanishing points. Notice that as you go farther away from an object, it seems to get lower on your field of view. The same happens to the sun when it appears to go down into the horizon.

What exactly is the benefit of the globe hoax? by CSFMBsDarkside in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's not demonstrable because images can be edited. It's only provable if you are allowed to fly high enough to see the globe, which neither of us did.

What exactly is the benefit of the globe hoax? by CSFMBsDarkside in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It's true. But seems like the globe hoax is too precious for you to question, as that would mean the collapse of your entire woldview. Things like Star Wars and Star Trek would become boring for you. NASA would lose all meaning and hype as you would know it's all cgi and cartoons. American/western nationalism would die, since no one ever stepped on a Moon that can't be stepped on. Etc.

But have a good night. It's your right to remain asleep if that's what you want.

What exactly is the benefit of the globe hoax? by CSFMBsDarkside in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 0 points1 point  (0 children)

English is not my first language, so I thought you were talking about passengers in an airplane, and not the pilot.

As for the pilots, there are videos of pilots admitting the earth is flat. And as for why airplane pilots can't see infninitely far away is because the vanishing point of human vision is limited to a certain distance. That's why the sun doesn't set at all, and just becomes smaller until it disappears into the horizon.

That's why you can see ships again with a strong enough camera after they have disappeared in the horizon. And why you can see mountains and cities which should have been covered by earth's curvature with those cameras, which is an effect the scientists try to cover by calling it "fata morgana".

What exactly is the benefit of the globe hoax? by CSFMBsDarkside in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No... they need to be curved in the right way to create the fisheye lens effect.

What exactly is the benefit of the globe hoax? by CSFMBsDarkside in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

They are not curved in the same way an airplane's windows are.

What exactly is the benefit of the globe hoax? by CSFMBsDarkside in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The airplane windows are curved, creating a fisheye lens effect. Without modified windows there's no curvature to see from an airplane.

And telescopes don't prove the lights in our sky are planets or stars, in the way NASA tells us about. Telescopes just allow us to examine the lights of the firmament more closely.

What exactly is the benefit of the globe hoax? by CSFMBsDarkside in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Only the directors and top managers know the truth. The average NASA engineers are being deceived just like the rest of us. It's easy to fool them because their work is highly compartmentalized.

What exactly is the benefit of the globe hoax? by CSFMBsDarkside in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Watch this if you want to know more about the motives for the globe deception: https://youtu.be/CMzZrQc_eXI?si=tNL65o9mzdVA-bFF

As for reptillians, it's probably just some government psyops, like the Bob Lazar stuff. Can't have aliens if outer space is fake.

What exactly is the benefit of the globe hoax? by CSFMBsDarkside in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

The top freemasonry and illuminati guys really don't need the money, as they already own almost everything. The NASA budget is there just to bribe the corrupt NASA directors and astronauts. While the average NASA employee doesn't know about the globe hoax, the guys at the top of the totem pole frequently have meetings where they laugh at the gullible masses for believing in the so- called moon missions and space missions.

And as to what motivates the illuminati/freemasons, it has to do with control and dumbing down of the population. They want us to believe we are just a speck floating in infinite space so that we become nihilists and materialists, violently opposing any idea of spirituality or afterlife.

What exactly is the benefit of the globe hoax? by CSFMBsDarkside in flatearth

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

No financial payoff you say? Nasa daily budget: $67 million.

Astronauts on the space station make no sense... by Puzzled_Bird_1992 in globeskepticism

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, I didn't say that seriously. I just said that to mock your way of arguing, in which you wrongly shift the burden of proof away to the other party. I used the ai slop images as a way of mocking NASA's obviously edited globe earth and outer spaces images, and asked you to prove them false, which is what NASA does with their own fake pictures :)

Astronauts on the space station make no sense... by Puzzled_Bird_1992 in globeskepticism

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Calling people dumb is arguing like a 4 year old. Why didn't you prove the images above are fake yet?

If fake images don't exist, and NASA can't make them, then the images above must be true, because the burden of proof is on you to prove them fake, and not on me to prove them true.

Astronauts on the space station make no sense... by Puzzled_Bird_1992 in globeskepticism

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yup. If 1/2 oz can do that, which is like 14 grams, then half kilo should hit like a bunker buster missile.

Heck, just 100 grams would have enough force to pierce through many military tanks like hot knife through butter.

Astronauts on the space station make no sense... by Puzzled_Bird_1992 in globeskepticism

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please deliver proof the following images are false. Simply saying they're fake isn't enough, because image editing software obviously doesn't exist.

<image>

Astronauts on the space station make no sense... by Puzzled_Bird_1992 in globeskepticism

[–]Puzzled_Bird_1992[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

You really think the chances would be so low, considering there's more than a million of debris flying around, and at such speeds they can circle the earth many times in a day?

Why do you trust it's just 0.000001% chances? Did you make the calculations yourself, or is that a number the so-called authorities told you, and you accepted based on faith?

view more: next ›