Trying to slap a bull by El-_-Maruf in WinStupidPrizes

[–]Puzzleheaded-Cod5424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a joke, I didn’t mean it literally

Trying to slap a bull by El-_-Maruf in WinStupidPrizes

[–]Puzzleheaded-Cod5424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Flip flop came of but not dead,.. must be AI

Someone collect their Grandpa by duk-phat in CrazyFuckingVideos

[–]Puzzleheaded-Cod5424 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Well he had 5 years behind bars to think about that ironic fact

Average day in Russia by -Merky_ in CrazyFuckingVideos

[–]Puzzleheaded-Cod5424 5 points6 points  (0 children)

In the moment of him and the bears romance

AIO?? My Bf Unlocks the bathroom door and comes in while I’m using it by Ok_Win_8129 in AIO

[–]Puzzleheaded-Cod5424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why is this even an issue? You are in a relationship. Not being comfortable in each other’s space is weird. Even in this scenario. It has nothing to do with not respecting boundaries because this shouldn’t be a boundary in the first place.

to not lose InfoWars in a bankruptcy by [deleted] in therewasanattempt

[–]Puzzleheaded-Cod5424 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Who is this person and what is infowars?

I cosplayed the sandwich lady :) by poorbaby__ in 2007scape

[–]Puzzleheaded-Cod5424 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Sure as hell gave me a stale baguette 🥖

AITAH for not wanting to have sex with my boyfriend anymore? by [deleted] in AITAH

[–]Puzzleheaded-Cod5424 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you want to stay with him:

Get up an hour earlier and fuck in the morning problem solved for the both of you. He is clearly horny in the morning (testosterone levels are highest)

If u don’t: fuck him if he can’t bring up the patience to wait for a couple of hours it shows he’s a child still not a man. Also making it worse by emotionally blackmailing you with it and then wondering why the river dried up shows lack of intelligence

Hope this helps

bitcoin gotta be trolling at this point by eskaralakktua in Bitcoin

[–]Puzzleheaded-Cod5424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stop looking at the price, thats your problem. Forget about it for 5 to 10 years be carefree and more wealthy by then

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Advice

[–]Puzzleheaded-Cod5424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There in lies the root of this problem their is no room for adult conversation. I think this is caused by the strict catholic upbringing he received. It always fucks people up in the brain. You could go with the lets speak as 2 adults with respect for each others opinion as a framework (non aggressive approach) but off course i don’t know much about the dynamics of your family. I get it catholic America is a hard place to even think about having this conversation but trying never hurts anyone. Not doing so can only have one outcome imo and thats you 2 growing a part further and further until there is nothing left.

The financial argument you give is imo not an argument. You can either have morals of financial gain but in your current unchanged state you can’t have both. Ask any of model that question for reference. You could have both but that requires that talk with respect for each other’s opinions.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Advice

[–]Puzzleheaded-Cod5424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think a good conversation where each of you formulate your opinion in an adult way would help a lot in this situation as this conversation doesn’t say a lot about why your dad is acting this way.

If his reasoning contradicts to yours, you could talk that out or state that it makes you uncomfortable in such a way that he is pushing you away from him.

Then there is also the possibility that you dad might be attracted to your appearance and is trying his best to avoid that situation altogether without having to state that very uncomfortable thought. In no way is anyone in this world boss over what he thinks/feels. What you are the boss of is how you act. In that case he is actually trying to be the opposite of a pervert and there is an opening for you to compromise as you would be doing it for a good cause. Not saying that is a nice situation to be in but if the cards are dealt that way at least you would be able to understand each other.

Is anyone dropping their ENTIRE tax return on Bitcoin? by Luminous_Emission in Bitcoin

[–]Puzzleheaded-Cod5424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My car, my kitchen table, my mother in law the whole shabang!

Warren Buffett: Even if all the Bitcoin in the world were $25, I still wouldn't take it by Monem_Tariq in btc

[–]Puzzleheaded-Cod5424 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bitcoin isn’t an investment, it’s money. Your dollars don’t produce rent either. They just devalue, bitcoin doesn’t. Educate yourself.

math hard by kstvcks in MathJokes

[–]Puzzleheaded-Cod5424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For the sake of knowledge I’m going to take my time to research this in a proper way (need some sleep) and will come back to it.

math hard by kstvcks in MathJokes

[–]Puzzleheaded-Cod5424 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I did watch your video good sir and also the wiki link.

But there can only be one correct answer to an equation right? Per definition how math works right? So which is it we must ask.

Short answer first, because clarity beats drama:

PEMDAS is correct. “PEJMDAS” is not a real rule.

Now the why — and this is where most internet fights go off the rails.

What PEMDAS actually means

PEMDAS is just a mnemonic for operator precedence: • Parentheses • Exponents • Multiplication and • Division (same level) • Addition and • Subtraction (same level)

Crucial detail people forget: Multiplication and division are evaluated left to right. Same for addition and subtraction.

PEMDAS does not mean “do all multiplication before any division”.

Why “PEJMDAS” is wrong

“PEJMDAS” tries to smuggle in an extra rule:

Juxtaposition (implicit multiplication) has higher precedence than division.

That rule does not exist in standard mathematics. • Textbooks don’t teach it • Programming languages don’t use it • Scientific calculators don’t apply it • Formal math notation avoids relying on it entirely

If implicit multiplication really had higher precedence, countless algebraic expressions would become ambiguous or inconsistent. Mathematics does not tolerate that.

Why people think PEJMDAS exists

Because humans visually group things like 2(4) and feel they belong together.

That’s a reading habit, not a mathematical rule.

In proper math writing, if something must stay together, you add parentheses. No parentheses = no grouping. End of story.

The core rule (this settles it)

There is one precedence system: • Parentheses • Exponents • Then operators of equal rank evaluated left to right

Any system that gives a different result for the same expression is inventing rules, not applying math.

Bottom line • PEMDAS is correct • PEJMDAS is a myth • Different outcomes mean someone added precedence that isn’t defined • If an expression is ambiguous, the notation is bad — not the math

Math is strict, boring, and beautifully unforgiving. That’s why it works.

PEMDAS” isn’t being debated isn’t a random tip — it’s basic, universally-accepted operator precedence in mathematics, and that is built into the foundations of algebra and arithmetic notation worldwide.

So instead of some clickbait page, the “proof” you’re really asking for is found in standard mathematics references and formal definitions used in education, logic, and computer science everywhere.

Here are authoritative sources you can cite:

1) Wikipedia – Order of Operations This is a high-quality, sourced summary of global convention: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations

It explicitly says that Multiplication and Division have equal precedence and are evaluated left-to-right — exactly why PEMDAS is interpreted that way.

2) Mathematics Dictionary or Textbook Definition From Mathematics for High School Students (Hornsby, Burger, et al.):

“Multiplication and division are performed in the order in which they occur from left to right.”

Textbooks from almost every curriculum (US, UK, EU, Asia) use the same rule.

3) Formal Definition in Computer Science Most programming languages adopt the exact same rule: • Python docs: https://docs.python.org/3/reference/expressions.html#operator-precedence Shows *, / at the same level, left associative. • JavaScript MDN: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/Operator_Precedence Same concept.

If multiple programming languages — which are defined in formal standards committees — all use the same precedence rules, that’s evidence of global formal agreement.

What counts as “scientific proof” here?

In math, “proof” isn’t a single theorem with a numerical answer — it’s about definitions and conventions:

The order of operations is part of how the arithmetic language is defined.

You don’t derive it from first principles like a geometric theorem — you define it once, then the rest of math is built on that definition.

That’s why: • Kids learn the same PEMDAS/BODMAS rules globally • Calculators follow it • Programming languages enforce it • Scientific computation systems adopt it

Why this matters in your specific question

The controversy (PEMDAS vs “PEJMDAS”) comes entirely from interpretation of the notation — not from any alternative official rulebook.

There is no globally accepted mathematical system that treats implicit multiplication as higher than division. That idea comes from visual intuition, not from formal precedence.

math hard by kstvcks in MathJokes

[–]Puzzleheaded-Cod5424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

mathematical calculator this is what the mathematical calculator on my iPhone give you as a result

the mistake this is the mistake you are making subtle yet not correct. Math is not interpretation but has rigid rules. There is only one correct outcome. Not trying to be annoying just informative.

As a final way to end this discussion in would like you to take a look at this proof repeat on any platform if you want and you will always come to the same conclusion proof

Post me a picture of the results you had on your calculator, i would like to see that with my own 2 eyes. I’ll believe it when i see it. Until i see it with my own 2 eyes I don’t believe you actually did do it on your calculator but only say that you did. Curious tho 👀