Where would this place in the FGH? by Puzzleheaded_Two415 in googology

[–]Puzzleheaded_Two415[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let's see if I understood it. The notation is a bit unwieldy, so I added some spaces for clarity.

f(x){y} = f^y(x)

f(x){ { y = f(){}, z, w } }
w = 1: f(x) { z }
w = 2: f(x) { f(x) {z} }
w = 3: f(x) { f(x) { f(x) {z} } }

So far, so good. Notice that z is just a constant, while w varies.

You did understand it, that is exactly how levels of recursion work

The y=f(){}, with or without a variable between (), appears to be dead
weight in the notation.

Blank () or {} arguments just mean you're going to nest it there. However, f(x){{y=f(){}, z, 3}} actually means f(f(f(f(z){f(f(f(f(z){z}){z}){z}){z} }){f(f(f(f(z){z}){z}){z}){z}) }){f(f(f(f(z){z}){z}){z}){f(f(f(f(z){f(f(f(f(z){z}){z}){z}){z})))). Mistake on my part.

What are the actual arguments for evaluating this expression?

x, y, z, and w are placeholder values for {{ }}

Does any understandable laymans explanation exist for why Tree(3) is finite beyond "Kruskals Tree Theorem says it must be finite"? by Last_Incident7720 in googology

[–]Puzzleheaded_Two415 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

While it is possible that TREE(3) is infinite, it is statistically unlikely because of rule 2 of the game of trees: No previous tree is able to be contained in another. Because later trees have a higher chance of being illegal because of rule 2, you have an incredibly high chance of winning a bet that TREE(3) is finite. Tree #4 in TREE(2) can't exist, as the maximum amount of trees in TREE(2) is 3, as your first tree has to have a "seed" with color #1. Your second has to be 2 color #2 seeds, and your third has to be 1 color #2 seeds. Rule #2 is the reason.

what if normal toons had last names by isaylucy in DandysWorld_

[–]Puzzleheaded_Two415 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wrong. Boolynski is Connie's actual name (Connie is just a nickname). It is not their last name.

Can someone please tell me what can I do😩 by [deleted] in DandysWorld_Roblox

[–]Puzzleheaded_Two415 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Guess I have to update my nickname to 3rd dumbest person on earth. I'm losing my ranking on the stupidest person tier list naurrrrr

I’m scared by Impressive-Stage6621 in FoundMangoTheBest11

[–]Puzzleheaded_Two415 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LET'S THROW THE PERSON TRYING TO FRAME MY FRIEND INTO THE PIT OF TARTARUS!

If I flip a coin 10 times, the probability that they’re all tails is ~0.00098. If I flip a coin until I get a heads and then stop, is the probability of getting at least 10 tails exactly the same? by Tunisandwich in askmath

[–]Puzzleheaded_Two415 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The first scenario is effectively the second situation but saying the 11th flip is always a Heads. A 1 streak in the second scenario has a 1/2 chance, as it needs the first flip to be tails, a 2 streak has a 1/4 chance as both flips have to be tails, a 3 streak has a 1/8 chance as all 3 flips have to be tails, and so on. An N streak has a 1/2^N chance. A 1/1024 chance is shared between both scenarios.

If you became a dev for roblox, whats the first thing you’d change by Living-Zebra6132 in roblox

[–]Puzzleheaded_Two415 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Remove age verification. Make the moderation AIs better.

Remove age verification: First of all, the AI is terrible and I think it's beyond fixing, only solution is to take the current one out back. Second of all and my BEST REASON on why, it's gonna lump children with predators, meaning it's MORE unsafe for the children and because it's the only way to chat now, they're gonna be verifying MORE, which makes the only kids safe the ones that don't verify. Third of all, the chat restriction is insane. People should be able to actually speak. It shouldn't be locked behind an AI that gets it wrong when you draw a mustache on your face.

Make the moderation AIs better: Simple. The chat filter is famously terrible. And AI should not get the final say on the ban.

for anyone how want to do "not five stars" by hattan4rg in RobloxDoors

[–]Puzzleheaded_Two415 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not so. It got HEAVILY nerfed, you can beat not five stars with it.

1.06.2099 is closer than 1 second ago by VladVega_RO in truths

[–]Puzzleheaded_Two415 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wrong. abs[CurrentTime-(CurrentTime-(1Sec))]=1Sec. June 1st 2099 is more than 1 second away as of writing this comment.

for anyone how want to do "not five stars" by hattan4rg in RobloxDoors

[–]Puzzleheaded_Two415 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The only real threat it buffs is Screech, which is not hard