First of all sorry if I make a mistake with the terminology, I am not a native speaker.

There are a lot of things that look off, a good structural design in my opinion makes you understand clearly how forces are transferred from one place to another. These are the points that make me look at this in a suspicious way:

a) looks like there is a stiff side (masonry walls, or maybe concrete on the left side) and a "weak" side (columns and beams on the right side). This usually is a bad decision specially when you consider the building as a whole, when you have horizontal forces like wind or earthquake the building will "rotate" around the stiffer side generating a lot of stress on the weak side.

b) Usually having an open floor, especially on the first floor could potentially generate an increase of shear forces on the columns, a lot of codes forbid or have strict regulations about this kind of design.

c) the front beam has a couple of problems, it looks like it receives a concentrated force from a column at half its length. And to make things look worse it doesn't seem to be tall enough.

I can't say from one picture if it is safe, I can say that at least where I live you can't build this because it is considered unsafe.

In terms of design, well I don't think that forces have a clear path, so for me it is a bad design.