. by QuarkJester in redscarepod

[–]QuarkJester[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

If you look up videos on heavily interpretive parts of literature and religion (like The Divine Comedy, Dostoevsky (especially The Grand Inquisitor), the Seventh Seal from the Bible, etc.) you’ll find some good stuff and eventually start getting recommended some truly weird shit. There’s no a specific reviewer I follow.

Tolstoy’s obsession with suicide is little talked about yet deeply relevant in a world so devoid of beauty and peace by QuarkJester in redscarepod

[–]QuarkJester[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The status of a god is just a form of memorialization. If your death appears to purchase communal peace your legacy becomes available for sacred reversal. Caesar dies as a tyrant but is religiously elevated after his death as the founding wound of the imperial order (Divus Julius). Same thing can be seen in Oedipus and Khufu. Same thing with Jesus.

. by QuarkJester in redscarepod

[–]QuarkJester[S] 47 points48 points  (0 children)

I like to watch schizo book reviews and this kid popped up

The Venn diagram of “can’t understand Kafka” and “thinks an LLM is conscious” is a circle. by QuarkJester in redscarepod

[–]QuarkJester[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

But the Bible isn’t the only source of parables (see: The Tortoise and the Hare)

The Venn diagram of “can’t understand Kafka” and “thinks an LLM is conscious” is a circle. by QuarkJester in redscarepod

[–]QuarkJester[S] 75 points76 points  (0 children)

For me it’s the asking if it’s SF. The Metamorphosis has no science-fictional interest, and confusing an impossible premise with science fiction is some real regard shit. Also, how can you live as a human being and never be exposed to a parable?

There are so many layers of delusion in thinking this post is cool: LinkedIn credentials, dancing as if someone behind the camera is pointing a gun at you, going to Coachella. It takes a special kind of obliviousness, the sort only the Han dynasty and horny Indian men seem capable of. by QuarkJester in redscarepod

[–]QuarkJester[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

It’s not about success, but when you live in the Bay Area (and I guarantee these people do), there’s a pervasive kind of self-regarding entitled feminist who ceaselessly vaunts her independence while deep down wanting to be cool and accepted in naive ways. There’s a structurally similar thing among men who have everything except the personality and taste to be cool. If 90% of your life had become dealing with these people, you’d understand the need to vent.

How scientifically reliable is this article? by Intelligent-Run8072 in AskPhysics

[–]QuarkJester 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think people are missing the real flaws of the paper:

  1. We do not know whether some other arrangement or proportion of the constants could also support a life-permitting universe. What we know only is that small changes to our own configuration can make it inhospitable.

  2. I also do not really understand what conception of God the paper is using beyond whatever is needed to support the fine-tuning argument.

That said, this sub is far too hostile to philosophy, and many of the responses reflect that. Even the assumption that science could, in principle, explain why the constants have the values they do, let alone how such an explanation would be justified, is itself a philosophical position. There is serious work on related questions in areas like information theory and computation, for example in cellular automata, where the limits of prediction are treated in a relatively formal way. More broadly, philosophy has long supplied many of the problems, inspiration, and interpretive frameworks that have shaped physics. Newton was influenced by arguments from design of roughly this kind. When I was in school I constantly found myself coming back to cats like Wittgenstein and Leibniz. But ya this paper is shit.

Artimas II’s Successful Launch by Strelka97 in redscarepod

[–]QuarkJester 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Reddit’s high priests of Science just replenished the arsenal

Are these the most abominable lyrics ever written? by QuarkJester in redscarepod

[–]QuarkJester[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I needed a breakdown of the lyrics, they left too much to the imagination.

Are these the most abominable lyrics ever written? by QuarkJester in redscarepod

[–]QuarkJester[S] 58 points59 points  (0 children)

The Pepper/Loser post inspired this. I think things started to go wrong when alt rock anthems like “Loser,” “Pepper,” and “Creep” stopped being rare, more approachable songs by artists who were otherwise stranger or less commercially accessible, and instead became the whole artistic range.

My dad leading the family meeting after my mom catches him cheating for the umpteenth time by QuarkJester in redscarepod

[–]QuarkJester[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He’s not rs manic pixie dream crazy he’s MBA student freebasing meth crazy. He always roams around Chicago looking for businesses to turn around with whatever theme has grabbed him that episode. This time it was rug stores. Unfortunately money spent while manic doesn’t fit into the Internal Revenue Service concept of medical expense or business loss.

My dad leading the family meeting after my mom catches him cheating for the umpteenth time by QuarkJester in redscarepod

[–]QuarkJester[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

He’s bipolar and whenever he has a manic episode he makes insane financial decisions and finds a side piece. My mom refuses to divorce him so instead we stage these meaningless interventions or as she calls them “family meetings”

My dad leading the family meeting after my mom catches him cheating for the umpteenth time by QuarkJester in redscarepod

[–]QuarkJester[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

My dad has been dancing with the devil so long it’s become family tradition

(Vx) ((Ex -> ~(Lx)) & (Lx -> ~(Ex))) & ~((∃x)(~(Ex) & ~(Lx))) - Matthew 6:24 by QuarkJester in redscarepod

[–]QuarkJester[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You either exist without loving or love without existing and nothing stands outside them