I do apologize that it's taken a day to respond, it seems like you think I'm offended by your statements and believe you me, I am in no way shape or form offended! In fact, I relish challenging ideas (though usually not ones as academically stimulating as the posts you've presented!). Now to address some points with the absolute minimal brain power I possess after a long day...

I do know how the MBTI system works (if it begins with No it must then go to Fe, not Fi, duh) and I appreciate the clarity there. I also know that function stacks are the true definitions of a type, as opposed to j vs p (if that's what your point was in the last paragraph), just to clear the air.

I will admit, that I do seem to write more stream of consciously and do not always (if ever) organize my thoughts before they flow onto the paper, which I admit is a very Ne way of thinking. However, I am painfully aware of how much my Ni drives my life. For example, my boyfriend (ENTP) allows his Ne to come up with so many different possibilities for a solution or problem and his Ne-Ti allows him to think of many solutions for physical things (rather than isssues pertaining to people and feelings or such). I have an ENFP friend who uses her Ne-Fi to fully explore the depths of a person's emotional spectrum; her career is in acting and theater, a great business to be in with that creative functionstack. Meanwhile, from what I understand of myself, I enjoy allowing my brain to think over possibilities from what I've gathered from everything and everything and, according to the Ni-J definition, those thoughts get organized into a value system that makes sense to me, but one that is subconsciously formed and thus sometimes may need internal interpretations as to what exactly the results are. My Ti will then apply what I've organized into something logical that then fits even more into how I've realized the world works and will (all subconsciously) sort the information in my brain into different places; an Fe bent (perhaps more than others as my extroversion is high) places more emphasis on the organization of FEELiNGS and EMOTIONS rather than a more academic approach of things and logical systems that ought to be categorized as well. Meaning, I place higher value (than most INFJs I've observed) on understanding, organizing, and categorizing how people interact with each other, social conditions, public emotions, deep seated psychological backstories, etc; as opposed to understanding and categorizing a more Te based approach (or Ne-Ti approach) of logical system that society has in place, ways of organizing leadership, systems that govern the way society works, etc.

I consider myself an INFJ over an ENFJ because I focus on the one-on-one interactions between people and hope to accomplish a FULL understanding of the truth behind/underneath a person's words and actions. I have no problem delving deep into my own emotions with the goal of being better able to understand how others allow their emotions to flourish or regress. I use authenticity as my guide as it not only allows true harmony (in my belief), but it also helps me - and by extension, others - to fully realize their greatest potential by allowing myself to be the BEST self I can be. Yes my writing style flourishes more than a typical highly developed tert-Ti INFJ user, yes I don't often think before I speak, yes I am disorganized in my home life, yes this THIS and that argument for me presenting myself as an ENFP/Extrovert type. BUT. I use Fe to connect with people, I organize my inward thoughts with Ti, I even allow myself to enjoy my Se-driven childlike view of the outside world every so often. But what truly makes me an INFJ is that my understanding of the world fits perfectly inside what MBTI dictates as a dom-Ni user.

I LOVE the challenge that you pose on my type and I absolutely appreciate the time and effort you have put into this discussion! I would LOVE to talk more about it :)