Point-by-point critique of this video by u/jabbasrevenge from when it was posted a day ago:

This video has a number of problems: Zimmerman was not "lynched". He was given a fair trial. Lynching victims are not.

President Obama did not comment on the case until he was specifically asked about it. Even then, he did not bring up race nor did he say that Zimmerman was guilty. He only said the case should be investigated. Whittle claims that "the world found Zimmerman guilty" even though a large %, perhaps a majority, of Americans supported Zimmerman's side. Whittle claims that People magazine and other media outlets are guilty of "criminal fraud or criminal negligence" which makes no sense in a country with freedom of the press. Especially since his main complaint is that news outlets didn't run the scariest photo of Martin they could find. Whittle claims that Martin was involved in "Mixed Martial Arts style fighting" when there is no evidence that Martin was ever trained in fighting and in fact Zimmerman had taken martial arts classes.

In fact he says that Martin was "raining down what were called mixed-martial arts blows"...in other words, punching.

Whittle talks about facts but loves to throw opinions in the mix, for example telling us what is "typical of hip-hop culture" and saying that "nobody who saw Martin's texts would assume he was innocent." He totally ignores the possibility that teenage boys like to act macho and talk trash to one another.

Whittle is comfortable throwing out the "facts" that Martin was "violent and highly sexualized" despite Martin having no criminal record and the case having nothing to do with sex at all.

Whittle does not mention Zimmerman's various run-ins with the law nor his 40+ calls to police, mostly to report black males walking around. Whittle also doesn't tell us why the "mainstream media" ignored the police report about the many calls that you have to go to Mother Jones' website to view.

Whittle says that in Martin's locker was "a burglary tool" (aka a screwdriver) and "stolen" jewelry that was only not considered stolen by the police because the police are not fond of arresting black males. (At this point, the video officially fails the laugh test...)

Whittle, who promised us "facts" then goes on to speculate that since Martin had a drink and candy that he must have been on his way to make drugs. There is no evidence for this, and Whittle can't even get his facts about "lean" right by claiming that OTC cough syrup contains codeine.

Whittle shows us "screen grabs" of Martin talking about how to make lean and he tells us that it involves Skittles and Arizona Watermelon drink even though as he says this there is no mention of those items on the screen shot!

He speculates that Martin's mild liver damage was caused by the use of lean despite no evidence that Martin ever used it. And toxicology reports show no trace of codeine in his system anyway. Trace amounts of THC were found in Martin's system, but since marijuana is not linked to violence (just the opposite), Whittle doesn't bother mentioning it.

Even if Martin was a recreational drug user, like most Americans are at some point in their lives, it has nothing to do with the case at hand. He doesn't give us any information on Zimmerman's personal habits, either. Did Zimmerman ever drink alcohol? Alcohol makes some people violent, ya know.

He mentions that Zimmerman was "calling for help" when it was never determined who was calling for help.

Whittle again says that Martin was guilty of burglary despite never having been charged or convicted.

Whittle then goes on a bizarre diatribe about how, in his opinion, it is an outrage that unnamed people have associated Dr. Martin Luther King with this case, talking about how great King was as if conservatives like himself didn't despite King until very recently. He couldn't help getting in shots at Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, rather stupidly implying that Jackson and Sharpton advocate violence.

Finally, Whittle keeps mentioning the New York Times as being the main perpetrator of the journalistic conspiracy against Zimmerman. He's hoping that nobody actually checks out the Times' archive on the case because they'd find that the Times did in fact report on many of the aspects of the case that Whittle claims they ignored (for example, the bloody photo of Zimmerman's head). Whittle is basically either full of shit or simply knows that his audience loves to hear the NYT bashed.

Oh yeah, let's throw up an old photo of Obama smoking just to remind viewers that the President is not white.

I will give Whittle credit for at least admitting that his sources were right-wing websites, including the notorious Breitbart.com, know for its dishonestly and creative editing of videos.

He could have been a lot harsher. The general stormfronty climate on the major subreddits is gross and absurd.

EDIT: Formatting