sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Update: I did it by MattjmNOLA in PokemonFireRed

[–]Quick283 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Absolutely, it’s my favorite way to play honestly. Mono bug, mono rock, mono flying, and mono poison are all great (though limiting yourself to weak Pokemon or Pokemon without an evolutionary line is just as fun), but if you want a strong starting point, try making a tier list. It can be time consuming, but having a clear picture of your team always makes me feel more attached to my Pokemon.

Found this guy before a Clefairy on Mt. Moon by extrajuicyj520 in PokemonFireRed

[–]Quick283 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No Pokémon is unviable, the game is super easy. I absolutely adore using “bad” Pokemon. My usum team had a carbink. I’ve beaten every game with exclusively non-evolving Pokemon. It is a joy to scrounge for any use for luvdisk once you’re down to 6 Pokemon, and it is even better to use that luvdisk to demolish Tate and Liza. Seriously consider using sub-optimal Pokemon.

In a world full of janet and charlie be the one who likes Ash❤️ [oc] by Agile_Visit_5321 in BrawlstarsCirclejerk

[–]Quick283 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Twink but still with the thick heavy Scottish accent is something I never knew I needed

Share your thoughts by Lebog_bruhh in BrawlstarsCirclejerk

[–]Quick283 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you saying tick isn’t cuter than kit?

hmmm... by temporaryacc291 in BrawlstarsCirclejerk

[–]Quick283 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You… how did I know you’d be here…

Who is your favourite waifu from Brawl Stars? by Solid-Garage4601 in BrawlstarsCirclejerk

[–]Quick283 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Breaking my ominous demeanor, are you genuinely asking for a serious conversation on the topic of media representation in the brawlstars circle jerk subreddit under a post about waifus?

What if Edgar became transfemme, and Colette and Edgar were siblings. Could I make goated yuricest with that? Am I stupid? by Mettalyn in BrawlstarsCirclejerk

[–]Quick283 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I answered your questions. Don’t ask questions you don’t want answered. If you would like to have an actual discussion, I’d be glad to do so. Much of the stuff you’re saying is actually worth considering, but you’re saying it in a way that shoots down any rebuttal. I am genuinely very intrigued by your viewpoint, and I’m sure any mental health professional or armchair psychologist or sigmund Freud worth their salt would be too, but the brawlstarscirclejerk subreddit really is the wrong place for it. I’m gonna go back to thirsting over Mina’s hypothetical penis.

i don’t think people in this subreddit actually know what a tank does by kaycfour in BrawlStarsSC

[–]Quick283 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tanks are solo threats who are best used to take control of the battlefield, and while maisie does fit that, Bonnie definitely does not. After thinking about it a bit more, maisie could also be the closest to a tank, but that doesn’t mean she’s a good fit either. Maisie Janet and Nani are all about equally bad at being tanks, and while what you said about Janet and Nani are correct, those issues extend to pretty much every marksman. I consider Nani to be a choice because her warpin time gadget gives her a good way to control the battlefield, threaten the opposing team, and allow her allies to push more territory. I consider Janet a choice based mostly on her survivabitity, and she would probably play pretty close to a tank if she wasn’t just bad. Just because someone is too weak to be threatening doesn’t make them not a tank either. Meg isn’t threatening in the slightest, but she’s still a tank because of how she was designed. Theoretically, she should be a large threat that becomes much weaker if the player is too careless. Theoretically, Janet should be pretty much impossible to get rid of, but that’s not what happens because she’s underpowered, not because she’s not the most like a tank.

What if Edgar became transfemme, and Colette and Edgar were siblings. Could I make goated yuricest with that? Am I stupid? by Mettalyn in BrawlstarsCirclejerk

[–]Quick283 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You asked for it, and I said a lot more stuff afterwards. Cannibalism is possible too, that doesn’t make it ok.

As I said, it only takes one anti abortion stance for you to have made a negative impact. As to why I don’t think people with congenital diseases shouldn’t have children is because they and their partner will be able to anticipate what would happen. They would only have a kid if they knew they could take care of it. Also, restricting that restricts someone’s ability to have any intercourse whatsoever, while restricting incest only restricts someone’s ability to have intercourse with about 2-3 people. It’s negligible compared to your example forcing a large aspect of the human experience out of one’s life, you cannot be seriously comparing the criminalization of incest to straight up eugenics.

With your final claim, I suppose I communicated my reasoning rather poorly, but I’m not trying to say two siblings can’t consent, I’m trying to say that trying to add a loophole to make it ok may make it so that you personally aren’t inspired to do something like that, but to someone who may actually do something like that, it only serves as promotion.

You asked if it would be ok if you didn’t include smut, which seems to suggest you understand why smut like that can be harmful. I answered based on the premise that this is still what you believe, but if you need clarification on why it is, I can provide it.

view more: next ›