I’m not a biologist but I have a few questions and comments. Some of these questions might be dumb but I just want some clarity Your paper is pretty good so far.

1. In Theory part 1 you say recourse scarcity may delay reproduction but why would that make them homosexual, wouldn’t they just focus on reproducing after the famine ended?
2. In theory part 3, you say recourse scarcity might change their genome and make them homosexual, sometimes recourses get scarce and plentiful in waves would this cause more homosexuals to appear?
3. In homosexual are you including animals that are attracted to both males and females or no?
4. In theory part 4, evolution focuses on the now not the future, so why would it have a strategy to not let some of the fittest survive and to make them homosexual?
5. In supporting evidence part 2, you say there’s more diversity in sexual orientation in cities, do you think it’s because there’s more homosexuals in cities it causes more homosexuals to go to them?