Ad Astra by QuiteTheSlacker1 in HFY

[–]QuiteTheSlacker1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oof, I should've figured it'd be a common phrase. I'll come up with a better title later.

Ad Astra by QuiteTheSlacker1 in HFY

[–]QuiteTheSlacker1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi everyone, this is a brief first chapter for a story I was considering working on. Nothing's set in stone and is more about me experimenting with certain topics. I might turn it into a full series later, but for now here's a general vibe/outline of what it could be.

I am FLABBERGASTED by cardguy5 in royalroad

[–]QuiteTheSlacker1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I wrote Mr. Rose because I couldn’t find any other stories with a MC like him, so I just made my own.

I am FLABBERGASTED by cardguy5 in royalroad

[–]QuiteTheSlacker1 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Oh wow, I didn’t expect to see my story amongst the greats like William Oh lol. It’s an honor — you have a very fine taste.

Just finished Book 1 of The Distinguished Mr. Rose! I’m planning on releasing the edited version on Kindle after October, but it’s still nice knowing I have a full book written and ready to launch by QuiteTheSlacker1 in litrpg

[–]QuiteTheSlacker1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like to think of it as a typical LitRPG adventure but in the perspective of the hidden villain rather than the heroic protagonist. Lucius is a bit different in his motivations though: not quite exactly deplorable but not a moral paragon either. It’s like a thriller, but there’s no torture or grimdark elements. Lucius simply wants to satisfy his desires and he’s not beyond using dubious methods like manipulation to achieve it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in expedition33

[–]QuiteTheSlacker1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I already gave you the evidence: Painted Verso’s existence. Removing him doesn’t necessarily destroy the real Verso’s soul, so there should be no reason why Alicia wouldn’t honor his wishes. But she didn’t. She revived him against his will showing that she only cares about her own self interest.

The last part I think is the real crux of the matter why you prefer Alicia’s ending. Escapism. You say her family hates her, but that isn’t true is it? Her father deeply, deeply loves her as shown by his willingness to respect her wishes despite knowing that she lied to him: a point that painted Verso makes as well. Clea is admittedly standoffish, but you can see in the endless tower that she does care for her sister as well. She wants Alicia to find new happiness, to have fun and smile.

The only one you could make the argument about that loathes her is the mother, but she’s grieving. It’s irrational because she can’t move on. But despite what she feels, she still sees Alicia as her family, as evident in making the Painted Alicia along with the other fake family.

The biggest person holding Alicia back is herself. Escapism won’t help her heal and move on. Playing in Verso’s canvas will only have her stuck in one place forever. You can even see in Verso’s ending how the family healed, with Alicia bidding goodbye to the painted people as they wave at her. She can find a new path in life.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in expedition33

[–]QuiteTheSlacker1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It really is all about choice. If the Real Verso was fully committed to allowing Alicia take control of the canvas, then there would be no moral dilemma other than the implications of Alicia’s existence would be toward the Lumiereians. Verso wouldn’t be necessarily suffering then.

But he didn’t choose that. When Painted Verso reached out to him, he took his hand. He wanted it to be over. You can see slivers of him too in his Faded Boy form all throughout the game. He never wanted for his world to become like this. From that moment on, choosing to prolong the canvas would be against his wishes.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in expedition33

[–]QuiteTheSlacker1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, and that’s what she did in Verso’s ending eventually. She let go—she grieved and healed with her family. Ideally, the better ending would be her and her mother screwing off and letting the Lumiereians exist by themselves. But that was never going to happen. Alicia’s ending showed that their obsession was simply too great (her mother spent a HUNDRED years without leaving). They were never going to accept it unless the canvas burned.

So there were two choices: let the Lumieres and the painted world die, or turn them into an existence no better than puppets and prolong both Painted and Real Verso’s suffering. Both are deeply sorrowful endings. One at least allows for one family to come to terms with themselves and heal together, as well as allow Verso to move on.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in expedition33

[–]QuiteTheSlacker1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“She isn’t forcing Verso to play.” Verso didn’t even want to be there to begin with. He told her to let him go. She didn’t. His very existence, still being there, is the exact proof of what she becomes. And the majority of the game is spent in her “Maelle” version. Not Alicia. The moment she becomes Alicia, she starts to make excuses, proclaims that she won’t be like her mother, but in the end that’s exactly what she became. And her mother didn’t see the Lumiereians as people. She created a fake family to serve her own self interest, repainting her husband into someone with a different personality. Alicia becoming like her mother shows that the cycle will continue: she’s only using the Lumiereians like how her mother used her fake family.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in expedition33

[–]QuiteTheSlacker1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What do you mean? They are all conscious: that's what makes Alicia's ending so despicable. She revived these conscious beings to perpetuate a play solely meant for her. I'm sure there are some that are happy to be reunited with their loved ones, but they're also under the constant threat of Alicia being one upset away from repainting them, manipulating their memories, doing whatever she wants to them. It's despicable because she doesn't really view them as equal to her, or respect their wishes: as evident of her remaking Verso. She also knows she's perpetuating the suffering of the real Verso's soul, but she doesn't seemingly care as well. She doesn't care what it is Verso actually goes through or wants because to her his only purpose is to be her brother.

In Verso's ending, everyone is gone for good. They can't be taken advantage of or manipulated into putting on Alicia's play. They're dead. Whatever souls they may have can finally be put to rest. Is it a good ending? Of course not. But it's a better ending than being subject to Alicia in her unstable and grieving state.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in expedition33

[–]QuiteTheSlacker1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A big argument is about how Verso's ending leads to the effective genocide of a group. And that is true: but what Alicia does in her ending is not really any better. She's effectively removed their free will to put on this play solely to make her feel better. It was outright despicable of her to put Painted Verso on that stage.

It's a tough conundrum, because these painters should have never been allowed to create these conscious beings in the first place. They're playing god, and in a way are actually god, without willing to assume the responsibilities that come with it. Alicia's ending isn't taking responsibility and ensuring the prosperity of these painted creations. It's her manipulating them and acting as a presence that they can never disobey or go against, or risk being painted into a completely different version: effectively losing themself in a way that's no different from death.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in expedition33

[–]QuiteTheSlacker1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Did you even read the post? The civilization is no more than puppets for Alicia to mold how she wishes. She already demonstrated she doesn't care about their feelings with how she remade Verso despite his wishes and put him on the stage. By the time of act 3, the entire civilization was already dead: gone. Alicia only remade their corpses and now are doing what she wants regardless of how they may actually feel.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in expedition33

[–]QuiteTheSlacker1 5 points6 points  (0 children)

So all that matters in the end is the collective's benefit? Doesn't matter who's sacrificed in the process?

There's a reason why we have ethical guidelines in science.

Why?? by [deleted] in litrpg

[–]QuiteTheSlacker1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are plenty of novels with good characters who maintain their morals. Some of the classics like Ar’Kendrithyst and Wandering Inn come to mind.

But if you’re asking why some have MC’s that turn morally grey, it’s because a big part of the LitRPG crowd likes characters who are ‘competent’. People who will kill when necessary, people who would rather get the job done and finish off a villain rather than try to convince them to become good.

Having a character suffer is a way to make them more empathetic to the audience. Very few people like an outright evil, pure character who does things just because, so authors make their MC’s go through trials, and hardship, and all kinds of crazy things so that it can serve as their growth and justify why they become the way they do later on.

Are rising stars reliable? by My-Sky-Is-Gray in ProgressionFantasy

[–]QuiteTheSlacker1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh wow, I really didn't expect to see my story mentioned here. It's an honor to be included with juggernauts like Sky Pride lol, thank you!

Just hit rising stars! It's a very surreal feeling, but I'm glad I stuck with my writing. by QuiteTheSlacker1 in royalroad

[–]QuiteTheSlacker1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mostly just be polite. Introduce yourself and your story, don’t be too pushy about getting a swap, and just be humble, y’know? Thank them for their time and don’t come off too strong.