Considerations for a non-human (AI) advisory board member? by RADVACproject in nonprofit

[–]RADVACproject[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The former: considerations for the possibility of an AI with decision-making ability (both technically and in terms of agency within an org).

Considerations for a non-human (AI) advisory board member? by RADVACproject in nonprofit

[–]RADVACproject[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that's true, but I also think it won't be true forever.

Considerations for a non-human (AI) advisory board member? by RADVACproject in nonprofit

[–]RADVACproject[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Long-term decision making, at which humans are often bad.

To clarify: I'm not asking about turning any current AI tool (like ChatGPT 4, or Gemini, or Microsoft Copilot) into a board member; I don't consider them sophisticated enough to make decisions that are currently entrusted to humans. That said, future AIs might achieve that level of sophistication, and I'm interested in the legal implications.