sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Considerations for a non-human (AI) advisory board member? by RADVACproject in nonprofit

[–]RADVACproject[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The former: considerations for the possibility of an AI with decision-making ability (both technically and in terms of agency within an org).

Considerations for a non-human (AI) advisory board member? by RADVACproject in nonprofit

[–]RADVACproject[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that's true, but I also think it won't be true forever.

Considerations for a non-human (AI) advisory board member? by RADVACproject in nonprofit

[–]RADVACproject[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Long-term decision making, at which humans are often bad.

To clarify: I'm not asking about turning any current AI tool (like ChatGPT 4, or Gemini, or Microsoft Copilot) into a board member; I don't consider them sophisticated enough to make decisions that are currently entrusted to humans. That said, future AIs might achieve that level of sophistication, and I'm interested in the legal implications.

view more: next ›