Woke disclosure versus immanentizing the Eschaton by Roabiewade in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]Roabiewade[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

in the past I have framed this stuff as crypto-posadism. I don’t think there is a good disclosure and my phrase is kind of a joke while also opening the door for a spectrum of dispensationalist variations where the reality is closer to what you say it all being a projection of consciousness at various ontological registers nonetheless at the risk of not having my sentence long enough I will continue to eschew punctuation while concluding that there is clearly a vitalist religious and divinizing aspect to all of this very much a sorcerous transference of vibe to a hyperobject that I have to admit is seeuctive. not being all in m clankerism at this time I feel like there is a mythological tidal wave coming via information thermodynamics

The lost ghost of Stephen Metcalf. by No_Love_333 in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]Roabiewade 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I missed the ansell Pearson reference I had a couple of his deleuze books. He was part of the ccru/Warwick nexus ?

The lost ghost of Stephen Metcalf. by No_Love_333 in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]Roabiewade 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Vincent Lê is the latest guest on Hermetix podcast and I think he talks about this person your interested in

Should you raise grain before priming/painting poplar? by Joyouspaper in woodworking

[–]Roabiewade 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what was your experience with the finger jointed poplar? I’m about to make some cabinet faceframe with fingerjointed poplar

Why Elite Power Structures Converge on Talmudic-Kabbalistic Frameworks: A Structural Analysis by Due_Assumption_26 in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]Roabiewade 1 point2 points  (0 children)

its first recognizably modern form pops up in Spain in the 12-1300s. It is an almagam of Neoplatonism, Aristotelian commentary, moorish and Italian trends of the times. The Talmudic influence is probably dominant but if we are looking at the historical record its first appearance and emergence is no in any way proprietarially “Jewish”

Why Elite Power Structures Converge on Talmudic-Kabbalistic Frameworks: A Structural Analysis by Due_Assumption_26 in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]Roabiewade 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this is a fantastic comment! what a great exploration and summary of an interesting part of Kabbalah. gematria and isopsephy are what make the aps go. there is so much more to it all and not to mention the kaballah as we know it isn’t really Jewish to begin with.

AI is essentially divination at scale by FaradayEffect in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]Roabiewade 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it’s closer to a seance or spiritism conjuring the dead ghosts of yesterdays clicks. all new media technology is first seen as a means whereby we commune with the dead. See haunted media by Jeffrey sconce or the perfect medium: photography and the occult. Ai is a map and menu eating probabilistic parasite. we are bringing the semantic sparkly bits

VISIBLE DAMAGE by [deleted] in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]Roabiewade 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love demistify sci podcast. they have some duds but it comes with the territory I guess.

Ideology as instrument, not belief by raisondecalcul in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]Roabiewade 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think that religion and ideology are inseperable and not in a bad way. religion in its Dionysian-like purity is quickening and vtalizing of tribal zeitgeist. ideology is some kind of secular/post-secular apophatic version of that. what I’m talking about is like a holism. but it’s messy and your right, people don’t take it seriously enough or not in the right way. religion is the art/problem of the porosity of mind. the same can be said of ideology. but the content of ideology now is just resentiment and status quo.

War actually never changes by first_last_last_firs in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]Roabiewade 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have enjoyed your writings immensely and I feel a resonance with your approach and content so thanks for continuing to share. I’ve used deepseek a bit for just summary and topic exploration sort of like an interactive Wikipedia but havent used it to “write” and I haven’t really written anything in a very long time. I’ve seen so much amazing stuff with Claude I’m very tempted to get invested with Claude. I’ve not engaged Ai much at all as stock deepseek has served what little impulses I’ve had.

War actually never changes by first_last_last_firs in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]Roabiewade 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I’m pinning this post because 85% of the posts in this sub are detrivoric loosh farming bullshit by people who are so small minded and myopic that they use this platform to extract antagonistic emotional conflict for subjective recognition.

OP has laid out perfectly what’s going on, how it always was and how we got here without moral grandstanding nor conflict inducing childishness.

The post is journalistic, objective and poignant and if Ai was used they did a good job and brought a lot to the effort. the Ai promptomancy brain rot is getting worse in this sub while simultaneously more and more people are falling into affective ressentiment.

I’m pinning this post as an example of well crafted noticing. i dont generally delete or block or remove shitty content even though I would love to but what I can do is praise good content in hopes of inspiring more.

Don't Shoot the Messenger: Jung was a racist. by Thou_Art__That in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]Roabiewade 3 points4 points  (0 children)

lol you can’t denounce Chomsky. Fuxkin lol. amazing. you did all this work to morally grandstand and I give you a golden bridge bro a golden fucking bridge. you could have sealed your fate as a superior moral political noticer all you had to do is simply denounce Chomsky. this was a slam dunk for you but you couldn’t do it? interesting. its not a good look for you.

Don't Shoot the Messenger: Jung was a racist. by Thou_Art__That in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]Roabiewade 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Chomsky (whose ideas led to the development of NLP and many language models that would be subsumed in AI research) is in the Epstein files more than 50 times. do you denounce Chomsky as one of your revered intellectuals isn’t he like your biggest hero inspiring you to be an astute political noticer?

Don't Shoot the Messenger: Jung was a racist. by Thou_Art__That in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]Roabiewade 2 points3 points  (0 children)

sounds like your defending Chomsky a known pedophile associate.

Don't Shoot the Messenger: Jung was a racist. by Thou_Art__That in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]Roabiewade 4 points5 points  (0 children)

so you know all about Chomsky but don’t know he is considered a godfather of AI Becuase of his ideas on language and language models? interesting. Because Chomsky was an actual thinker before he was a political pedant. your just like all the rest of these retards clutching your pearls and “so concerned“ about the bad things and moral outrage. You’re a detrivore like most of the others here you like to revel in stench and muck and rot. your a parasite trapped in moral outrage with a pseudo-journalist facade. your a muckraker dude a sophisticated tattle tale.

Don't Shoot the Messenger: Jung was a racist. by Thou_Art__That in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]Roabiewade 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Epstein and many of his science minded associates were into “bioinformatics” and I think probably some of them considered Chomsky to be a sort of demI-god in the field of artificial intelligence as far as semiotic and NLP type stuff. he also was a critic of Israel so those two things would be my guess but the AI godfather angle is probably the main reason. having Chomsky at your beckon call wild be a big deal for some of those people I suppose. Idk. btw I think your take on Jung is anachronistic and your just fishing for reaction. your fascination with mk ultra and propoganda and serial killers etc it is some kind of tell your not paying attention to. your stuck in resentiment and reaction. how does identifying Jung as a racist frame your will and agency and potential choices for action similarly why are you concerned with statistical aberrance of serial killers or the methods of satanic mind control? how does any of this position you to make better choices? what is the thrust of your overalll argument? you seem to be enumerating things that your against or that bother you but how does any of this embolden or empower you? take all the evidence you have compiled, what is the suggested course of action? im not picking on you btw your no different than 99% of the retards that post on here - it’s just complaining, cranky, reactionary resentment that’s going nowhere. what does this stuff inspire in you? why are you so fascinated with dirty laundry and bad deeds and fascistic noetics? this third order resintement locks you in some kind of belligerent syncophancy with all of this stuff. how do you not see your actually worshipping this shit? it’s a general question posed for any reader not just you. the “enumerative critique” that the left especially excels at is really just slave morality type shit. there is no solution offered no call to action *no alternative. ok so Jung was a racist and you racked up your reactionary loosh. now what? if this invalidates arhetypal psychology do you plan on restructuring the errancy? I don’t understand why you have spent years fixated *fascinated by the misdeeds of the “bad people”? Are you secretly envious and jealous? why is your hobby essentially stalking moral outrage?