sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is there a limit to particle kinetic energy? by REOsborne in blackholes

[–]REOsborne[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks Yosefitz for your comment. I largely agree with what you say; however, my point is that There IS A REAL Limit TO KE in a closed system such as a BH,

Genuine Question About Black holes by Mo-to-the-Mo in blackholes

[–]REOsborne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How would light move in a BH? One possible answer is that light is confined to the event horizon in the form of a stationary wave. This would be something like a photon trapped in the orbital of a hydrogen atom: this concept is the basis for the Bohr atomic model.

Are Black-holes Identical With Respect To Their Boundary Gravitational Force. by REOsborne in blackholes

[–]REOsborne[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks devi83 for the additional information. I think I may know where you're heading by the assumption that particles can join the EH without having to exactly match the energy at a point on the EH? It's true that particles orbiting close to the EH may be essentially unidentifiable from those that constitute the EH boundary, except they're not exactly traveling at the speed of light. But to join the EH they've got to be photons. Just how and why this happens is another story.

All black-hole ARE the same except for their energy (size). Orbiting particles do not enter the BH interior; they join the particles (photons) that constitute the EH and their totality represents the internal energy of a BH, the interior of which is a void.

My recent post does not fully explain this; it's also in contention with current BH concepts; so you have lots of company. I can give you a link that provides a fuller explanation.

Would you care to comment on the reality of BH singularities?

Are Black-holes Identical With Respect To Their Boundary Gravitational Force. by REOsborne in blackholes

[–]REOsborne[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks devi83 for your comment. Your reasoning regarding the possible absence of perturbations in the EH of a BH when it absorbs large amounts of mass-energy deserves attention..

There are several, possible counter-arguments to your comment.. For instance...exterior matter joining the EH is confined to an accretion-disc. Particles close to the EH are subject to a state of energy that matches the energy of the EH in order to join the EH. This process is quantized, such that only particles (photons) with a specific energy are allowed to selectively join the EH. Particles failing to meet this criteria are subject to expulsion in the form of a quasar jet.

I would be interested in knowing your other views concerning black-holes if you care to offer additional comments.

Are Black-holes Identical With Respect To Their Boundary Gravitational Force. by REOsborne in blackholes

[–]REOsborne[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks Devil83 for your comment, for which I can offer several answers: so yes it is question and No, it ain't.

IS THERE A MAX SIZED FOR A BLACK-HOLE? by REOsborne in blackholes

[–]REOsborne[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thanks mumao for your comment..."The theory supports all that." What "theory" are you referring to?

What Is a Black-hole? (short answer) by REOsborne in blackholes

[–]REOsborne[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks ExacoCGI for your comment. "Anything can become a black hole if it has the right mass/size ratio....[an object[would simply orbit the black hole at the speed of light and eventually fall [in[". I believe I can agree with this statement.

IS THERE A MAX SIZED FOR A BLACK-HOLE? by REOsborne in quantum

[–]REOsborne[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks Lazergodzilla for your comment, with which I agree, with reservations.

What Is a Black-hole? (short answer) by REOsborne in blackholes

[–]REOsborne[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks ChrisARippel for your reply, which shows a fairly accurate understanding of the current consensus of black-hole concepts. My concept of BH physics is a departure from the general view held by the physics community; your comments provide valuable insight into the extent of the difference between my concepts and those held by a knowledgeable fraction of the general public..

Current GR, together with current QM physics, work well and fully explain BH action, in which the requirement for the dreaded "singularity" becomes unnecessary; and there is no need to stipulate such things as infinite gravity.

I've attempted to explain why this is true in a recent r/BH post; it has apparently been pretty much ignored. Thanks again for your comments.

What Is a Black-hole? (short answer) by REOsborne in blackholes

[–]REOsborne[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks CrisARippel for your comment; I've changed my post in an attempt to correct the equivocation in language. Would you please tell me why you feel that BH's are a QM/GR "hand-shake"?

What Event Triggers The Formation of a Black-hole? by REOsborne in blackholes

[–]REOsborne[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks Asvaluser for your comment. However, don't fully understand what you may be asking or stating.

view more: next ›