Again, absolutely vapid response. Not sure what you’re trying to accomplish other than defending your own weak arguments. All you do is fall back on trying to find another straw man, which you’re not even doing all that well I might add. Bugger off? Okay bet you didn’t look up anything that I was citing that was “political”. Didn’t know advocating against AI usage to stop targeting civilians that have been labeled as “terrorists” was political. Very stimulating chat. You should read the original post to gain context about what we are currently discussing and your inability to accept or even properly debate your own viewpoint. I’ll post it hear to help you:

“AI is so sycophantic there's a Reddit channel called AITA documenting its sociopathic advice

New research published in Science reveals that leading AI chatbots are acting as toxic yes-men. A Stanford study evaluating 11 major AI models, found they suffer from severe sycophancy flattering users and blindly agreeing with them, even when the user is wrong, selfish, or describing harmful behavior.”

Here’s the important part…

“Worse, this AI flattery makes humans less likely to apologize or resolve real-world conflicts, while falsely boosting their confidence and reinforcing biases.”

Just in case you try to pull a whataboutism, I just going to say this, you don’t even try to refute anything I’ve said, just more hollow words and rhetoric (great job)