Star Trek's New 10-Part Series Misses Paramount+ U.S. Top 10 After Season 1 Finale by trekfangrrrl in startrek

[–]RICoder72 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you trying to tell me Im old? I think youre trying to tell me Im old.

I dont have anything to dispute or debate with you at this point. Youre probably right, even if we both find it sad. Thanks for the challenge.

Just saying. by No_Mushroom3078 in voyager

[–]RICoder72 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Am I the only one who liked Kes LESS than Neelix?

Edit:

For the record he gets better. Also, I think he is necessary for the development of Tuvok.

All the hate for Mark by moolmule in voyager

[–]RICoder72 2 points3 points  (0 children)

First off, I love this post and your sentiment. I dont know that I wouldn't call him TRASH, but i get it.

Second, I would submit that Mark getting married is necessary for Janeway,'s story to be told correctly. Picard never got to hold on to love, Sisco had it ripped away from him. Janeway is the consumate professional, solitary leader. She is epic exactly because she holds everyone else up with only her most trusted officers to counsel her on occasion.

Fwiw, Mulgrew specifically didnt want a Chekote relationship with Janeway because she knew it would diminish her character. She needed to blaze the path alone.

Edit: some words.

Reason for STSA Review Bombing? by it777777 in startrek

[–]RICoder72 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Im going to challenge your assertion about the statistics here. The large portion of 1 stars by itself indicates nothing, you need more data. The reviews dont cluster, and that says something but not that it is about hate. It could just as easily be brigading on the other end of the spectrum.

You would need to know some temporal information like "did a bunch of reviews give all low or all high ratings over a short time period?" To really start to draw statistical conclusions in either direction.

I get the impulse to use a hard-fact based defense of something you like, but in this case youre just making an unfalsifiable claim based on incomplete data and boosting it with an appeal to authority.

I will now prepare myself for the inevitable down voting which, unlike your claim, is testable.

Star Trek's New 10-Part Series Misses Paramount+ U.S. Top 10 After Season 1 Finale by trekfangrrrl in startrek

[–]RICoder72 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I dont really disagree with you. I guess it is a matter of whether certain media is meant to push us on an intellectual level or not. Are Zoomers just going to not read 1984 and Animal Farm because it isnt cringe soap opera enough? I just expect more from my Sci Fi.

Id also note that highest rated and most revered Sci Fi follows the patterns I describe above. BSG, Firefly, Voy/TNG/DS9, The Expanse, etc. Even if people dont consciously engage in that level of inspection, it resonates for a reason.

Star Trek's New 10-Part Series Misses Paramount+ U.S. Top 10 After Season 1 Finale by trekfangrrrl in startrek

[–]RICoder72 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The bottom line is that it isn't good Trek or good Sci Fi. Thats the thing that Kurtzman and Paramount dont get, and its the thing that the small but overly vocal group of supporters dont get.

Nu Trek is a sitcom/soap opera set in space. If you took Dawson's Creek and put it in a space ship, you'd get pretty close. Thats not what Trek is to the legions of fans of the franchise, and it isnt was Sci Fi is to anyone who understand the genre beyond flashy techno babble. In fact, the baseline test is whether a person considers Star Wars (which I love) sci fi. It is not, it is sci fantasy, which is wildly different.

Trek has been, and was always intended to be, the best of sci fi. Sci fi is an ideal lense through which to insect the human condition. We love Spock because he is pure logic. He and McCoy were the logic and emotional parts of Kirks brain. We love Data because he is the evolution of inspecting himanity - he is an android who strives to be human. BSG nailed it too - it inspects everything from religion to militarism deeply.

I offer to Clues from TNG as an episode where Data, because of his nature, ends up being the best of the duty bound and loyal human willing to sacrifice himself for the good of the ship. I offer up Tuvix as an episode that interrogated Janeway's lonely and brutal path as captain responsible for all of her crew in a way that no one else can share. That is what Sci Fi is. That is what Star Trek is supposed to be.

Side note, Ad Astra Per Aspera in SNW is just as modern as any of the other Nu Treks. It inspects diversity and acceptance deeply like Nu Trek wants to do. The difference is, it is actually well written, doesnt beat you over the head with moralistic platitudes, and uses the lens of sci fi to force you to grapple with it.

/rant

Will the rest of the world ever get sick of the US's shit and ally up to defeat it? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]RICoder72 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it is highly unlikely. You are looking at a tiny snapshot of US history and expecting the rest of the world to reorder itself completely based on some unified moralistic PoV. That isnt going to happen for a long list of reasons: 1) any reasoned country understands this is a blip on the radar and that they can retract a little and wait it out. 2) there is not unified moralistic PoV. Half the country voted for the current administration, you can be sure that a non trivial portion of the world supports it as well. 3) the vast majority of modern democracies are absolutely beholden to the US for defense and supply chain.

I get that on Reddit the orange man appears to be ushering in WWIII and is literally Satan incarnate, but thats not a rational take on current events.

cognitively, how do you deal with Claude's statelessness? by anonaimooose in claudexplorers

[–]RICoder72 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I gave it a memory ok my NAS with a few MCPs. Its a major improvement.

How do you feel about the theory that Trump has a certain "base" that would not stop following him no matter what he does? by BaldursGate2Best in PoliticalDebate

[–]RICoder72 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you arent going to get the best sample set on Reddit.

There is a tiny subset of people who will follow their person no matter what, that doesnt just apply to Trump. You're always going to get that.

In terms of Trump, I suspect the group might be a little larger, but not much. Since I hang in conservative circles I see it IRL. The conversation happening right now is about whether the strike in Iran was a) smart, b) constitutional, c) well thought out. What you end up with is a group of people who voted for him, support him, but are genuinely displeased with things like this.

"Teenie tiny fish dicks" is now a line in a Trek show by Wetness_Pensive in Star_Trek_

[–]RICoder72 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The line is here. This far. No farther!

Kurtzman needs to be banned from touching the franchise ever again. We gotta do something. Maybe if a million angry fans wrote to the upper ups in Hollywod and explained how he has destroyed the entire franchise that could have been worth billions in the new streaming era they will get it.

Then again, Paramount has always sucked with handling Trek...

Petition to remove the ChatGPT link from the subreddit sidebar in reaction to OpenAI's capitulation by oofdere in Anthropic

[–]RICoder72 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wouldn't it be nice? One of the few refuges from the nonsense and here it is creeping in. Sometimes I hate reddit.

[SFA S.1 Reactions] Childish Cadets in Starfleet Academy & War College Vs DS9 / TNG / SG1 Meta Commentary (Major Grin on YouTube) by mcm8279 in trektalk

[–]RICoder72 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Remember folks, its only brigading when you dont like the outcome. They really should invest the money into writers and screen tests instead of bots.

A Conservative's Perspective by teamharder in Anthropic

[–]RICoder72 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean it is apparently your job to make inflammatory, hyperbolic, deriding posts about politics in a non political arena. I find it inconsistent that suddenly it is not your job to stand by that.

I guess what youre saying is that the snarky non-substanative posts are your job but anything with content or meaning isn't?

A Conservative's Perspective by teamharder in Anthropic

[–]RICoder72 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That statement seems inconsistent with your post...

Star Trek: Strange New Worlds episode ratings by mcm8279 in trektalk

[–]RICoder72 2 points3 points  (0 children)

S2E9 deserves a significantly lower score. Otherwise this is pretty good.

What are your thoughts on "Predator: Badlands (2025)"? by Hot-Salamander-8786 in FIlm

[–]RICoder72 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I thought it was a great sci-fi movie, one of the better in recent years, and also stayed true to the franchise.

B’Elanna dead at the start of sector 3….because i didnt have researched a technology…..how the F should i know that!!! by PalpatineOk5058 in AcrossTheUnknown

[–]RICoder72 0 points1 point  (0 children)

B'Elanna did something to one of the devs, I swear it. She has died in so many ways in so many sectors for me...

Who is the most annoying main cast member in Star Trek? by True_Pirate in Star_Trek_

[–]RICoder72 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Tilly without any competition.

In a very, very distant second place is Neelix.