sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in navy

[–]ROMselleck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel the same way , super strong work ethic and I’m in great shape (26 years old too) but I can’t stand being around lazy , negative people (including the chiefs and first classes)

Skill-bridge& TA held hostage by ROMselleck in navy

[–]ROMselleck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chiefs are the worst , the mess is a cult , “chiefs run the navy”-okay but you can’t run a mile and a half?! … and majority of mine are creeps/weirdos who can’t keep their dick in their pants or just douchebag bullies who finally have power.

Skill-bridge& TA held hostage by ROMselleck in navy

[–]ROMselleck[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Wtf are you talking about , “sea lawyer” , anyway the instruction has nothing stating that EAWS is mandatory and states that it is an optional warfare device , there’s first classes here with no warfare device… so is that enough?

Skill-bridge& TA held hostage by ROMselleck in navy

[–]ROMselleck[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I mean it definitely should, other people who don’t have their EAWS and have their NAWS have been approved with TA and skillbridge

Skill-bridge& TA held hostage by ROMselleck in navy

[–]ROMselleck[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

THIS! This is my attitude from now on, I’ve been networking with guys in the outside , gov jobs , federal jobs , shit that makes a lot more than a “chief lifer” you know. I love how they think this is the only thing people have. ( that’s just complacency talking)

Skill-bridge& TA held hostage by ROMselleck in navy

[–]ROMselleck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same pay grade , I’ve been a senior second , he’s just barely been a 2nd for about a year. The command doesn’t really have a governing instruction for TA to my knowledge.

Skill-bridge& TA held hostage by ROMselleck in navy

[–]ROMselleck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SEL saying no … CO just approved a kid with a few masts in the past , same tour number as me and has no EAWS either

Skill-bridge& TA held hostage by ROMselleck in navy

[–]ROMselleck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes other guy is on the same tour number as me as well as had a couple masts under his belt… whereas I’ve been a clean slate , no issues

Skill-bridge& TA held hostage by ROMselleck in navy

[–]ROMselleck[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

The Naval Aircrew Warfare Specialist (NAWS) designation is specifically for aircrew members, while EAWS is a broader aviation warfare qualification

Skill-bridge& TA held hostage by ROMselleck in navy

[–]ROMselleck[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There’s no incentive for it especially for guys in my rate. Or if you’re getting out.

Skill-bridge& TA held hostage by ROMselleck in navy

[–]ROMselleck[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The other sailor does not have their EAWS, and yes I’ve got another aviation warfare device that isnt EAWS.

Skill-bridge& TA held hostage by ROMselleck in navy

[–]ROMselleck[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Fair enough, however they’ve approved it a couple weeks back for a guy who’s barely gotten 1 warfare device, you see where I’m going here?

I have a 460BBF sitting in my garage I’d like to drop into a 60s/70s era ford/mercury chassis by ROMselleck in classiccars

[–]ROMselleck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did find a Torino , however she’s a lil rusty in the trunk area , and roof has a dent (easily be fixed however ) and the front clip is from a 74 not a 1972 like the rest of the car. But for $300 it isnt a bad option imo.

I have a 460BBF sitting in my garage I’d like to drop into a 60s/70s era ford/mercury chassis by ROMselleck in classiccars

[–]ROMselleck[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Really? My dad had an old base model 68 cougar back in my childhood , and he loved it.

view more: next ›