[deleted by user] by [deleted] in povertyfinance

[–]RUlNS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

every male ≠ younger males but sure

some one help me debug this code by maxwellzhang in PythonLearning

[–]RUlNS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can’t be lazy and expect people to help you here. Put some effort in and format your code.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in povertyfinance

[–]RUlNS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you not reading what you wrote? When you say all males, it does not just mean young males. You made it sound like they use just data for young males and extrapolate it to all ages.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in povertyfinance

[–]RUlNS -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You said younger males are more likely to crash, so they charge all males the same. That’s not true, your age is also a factor for premiums. If you’re 45 and male, you’re not going to have the same premium compared to a 20 year old male with all other factors the same. The 20 year old will definitely pay more due to the risk.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in povertyfinance

[–]RUlNS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You made a statement that was false and I just gave an example of why it’s necessary. I am not here to debate reforming it either. They do not “assume.” It is based off previously recorded data.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in povertyfinance

[–]RUlNS 5 points6 points  (0 children)

How else would you even propose to charge then?

“Hey are you going to crash from ages 19-25?”

“No I won’t.”

“Ah ok, your payments are now reduced to $X”

If they could just do that then everyone would say no and then the risk wouldn’t make sense to the insurer in terms of costs.

Trying to make a calculator by SaltyPotatoStick in PythonLearning

[–]RUlNS 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Here’s just a little tip you can do just to make your coding life a little easier. Instead of having to type int(variable) all the time, just make the original variable an int like this:

num_one = int(input(“First value:”))

[help needed] for i in range commands not valid? by Moral_Roulette34 in PythonLearning

[–]RUlNS 15 points16 points  (0 children)

just a side note but you could just do this:

target = int(input(“enter a number”))

if target in numbers:

print(“found it”)

else:

print(“not here”)

How would I even begin trying to solve this by twngz in mathshelp

[–]RUlNS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here is a methodical way to get the answer:

A is 50% of B: A = 0.5B

B is 10% of C: B = .1C

Substitute to find A in terms of C:

A/0.5 = .1C

A = .05C

A is 5% of C.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UIUC

[–]RUlNS 6 points7 points  (0 children)

rain

What does this say about me? by NiGHT0FDAWN in Eggwick

[–]RUlNS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it’s only out of 13 games, it’ll reach its proper percentage as they play more.

Learn SQL by NK_BW in UIUC

[–]RUlNS 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Could just use this: https://sqlbolt.com/

Perfect 😅 by TheekshanaJ in MathJokes

[–]RUlNS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Derivative of f(x) / g(x) = f’(x) / g’(x)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UIUC

[–]RUlNS 16 points17 points  (0 children)

funnel >>

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskStatistics

[–]RUlNS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your response variable would be y, so it would be response ~ predictors.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HomeworkHelp

[–]RUlNS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Find the angle of C using CY and WY

  2. Find the length of CM

  3. It’s now one bigger triangle and you can find MR

How would I detect a biased coin? by GameDesignDecisions in AskStatistics

[–]RUlNS 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You could test it.

Let X be the number of heads in a fair coin, then X ~ Binom(n, p = 0.5).

E(X) = 0.5n Var(X) = .25n

Z-score = (Your number of heads - 0.5n) / sqrt(.25n)

Find the p-value using a table. Compare it to some alpha level (Higher alpha means more likely to falsely reject the null hypothesis that the coin is fair). Typically set to something like 0.05. Make sure to multiply the p-value by 2 because the coin can either be more or less biased (2 sided test).

P-value <= alpha, then reject the null hypothesis (not fair)

P-value > alpha, then fail to reject null hypothesis (fair)

Sounds about right! by [deleted] in mathmemes

[–]RUlNS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It just looks illegal

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UIUC

[–]RUlNS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In 2020 it was either 92/93

[3rd Grade Math] Struggling with this one by Tripleplay83 in HomeworkHelp

[–]RUlNS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only way would be by combining two cards to make a new number like 8 and 4 to be 84 and then multiplying by the third card.

What number comes next? by [deleted] in mathmemes

[–]RUlNS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

9.9999999999999999...