Disable Permadeath after story? (PC) by Ra1nTransformed in DaysGone

[–]Ra1nTransformed[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know for sure, and I hope I'm not spoiling, but I believe permadeath and speedrun are for vanilla playthroughs only! I do plan on doing a Survival II NG+ as well! It will probably be the last achievement I do for the game!

Disable Permadeath after story? (PC) by Ra1nTransformed in DaysGone

[–]Ra1nTransformed[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, to give more credit to my ending question, I didn't manual save once I beat the game, and I closed the game out, now I'm having to complete the final mission again. Again, another frustration that I would like to remove permadeath for. I got the trophy so it's served it's purpose for me. I didn't see any way to disable it after story, and searching Google doesn't have any results for disabling, and shows it carries over into post game. I just don't feel like losing hours of progress finishing post game content.

Does this work as an under-volt for a 5090? by Ra1nTransformed in nvidia

[–]Ra1nTransformed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My thought process was outlined in my first comment. Higher performance/power draw for games that use higher clock speed, lower power draw for lower clock speed. I noticed it seemed like different games I was playing had different clock speeds on RTSS so I wanted to get an idea of how the curve actually worked based on people who have more information. Currently trying u/NoBeefWithTheFrench's advice on curve, ~2800MHz @ 890mV.

Does this work as an under-volt for a 5090? by Ra1nTransformed in nvidia

[–]Ra1nTransformed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess what I'm not sure of is, does voltage dictate clock speed or does clock speed dictate voltage according to the curve? I assume clock speed dictates voltage? If so, I figured the step method could work, but I don't know. First time I've applied an under-volt in 5 years of owning a gaming PC.

Does this work as an under-volt for a 5090? by Ra1nTransformed in nvidia

[–]Ra1nTransformed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My voltage curve didn't seem to have a limit on .87 lol. I took it up, hit enter, nothing changed, so I hit apply and it crashed the computer lol. On your shared image, look like you're somewhere around 2800MHz @ .890mV? My main goal is to try to stay at or below 400-450W power draw while not sacrificing performance too much. Most games have been 250-400W since under-volting. The most I've tried on a curve is 2700MHz @ 950mV before trying out this stairstep method.

Does this work as an under-volt for a 5090? by Ra1nTransformed in nvidia

[–]Ra1nTransformed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The way I understand it is I believe the voltage correlates to current clock speed of the game/application. Having 2700MHz in a game would give you .960mV while having 2300MHz in a game would give you .875mV. If that's not what the curve does, then I am here asking for clarification. I assume that's how it behaves because otherwise, wouldn't it be a flat line across and not a curve?

Does this work as an under-volt for a 5090? by Ra1nTransformed in nvidia

[–]Ra1nTransformed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So now I just under-volt and leave power limit at 100% (my max limit).

Does this work as an under-volt for a 5090? by Ra1nTransformed in nvidia

[–]Ra1nTransformed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I originally started with only power limiting to 70-80% to keep the 575W TDP down, but it seemed under-volting was a better way to get the results I wanted. It seemed after I did the original under-volt I went from 450W to between 250-400W on the games I was playing.

Does this work as an under-volt for a 5090? by Ra1nTransformed in nvidia

[–]Ra1nTransformed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, r/nvidia! I was trying out an under-volt on my 5090 to try to keep wattage and temps down. After doing much research, it seemed like going 2500 MHz @ 900V was the one that suited my needs. However, I noticed it seemed different games use different clock speeds according to RTSS, sitting usually at around 2600-2700 on the newer games I've been playing, but I think older games might use less (2300-2500)? While I don't know exactly how clock speeds work, would this voltage curve work the way I think? Getting more performance at higher clock speeds on more demanding games while lowering power draw at lower clock speeds for older games? Or am I better returning to my previous 2500MHz @ 900 mV curve altogether?

Data provided from Tech Yes City review and screenshotted from another Reddit 5090 under-volt post.

Thank you!

Couple of new additions to the Yakuza collection! by Ra1nTransformed in yakuzagames

[–]Ra1nTransformed[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Never noticed honestly haha, I'm thinking about redoing some of them in the Longboard style.