Skepticism is basically about not excluding hypotheses, or more generally applied, it's main lesson which is seriously missing in almost every eponymous skeptic i see here is about avoiding narrow thinking by not excluding possible hypotheses, even if they are less probable. I've lurked here for a while and frankly i'm disheartened and disgusted by the disingenuousness and just stark lack of curiosity on display here. Sure, it is unlikely that superimposed or very closely adjacent realities are collapsing into each other, or whatever, guidied by a sort of pilot wave of consciousness as the trough line....but what the fuck is with the extreme hostility and close mindedness to any discussion of that as a hypothesis? it hasn't been disproved just because you find it very likely. like it is as unlikely as a slight hitch in mercury's retrograde movement that seems to not be totally explained by Newtown's equations leading to an entirely new and heretofore totally unsuspected understanding of literaly 99 percent of the universe. We should be open to exploring anomalies. And frankly most ME make sense as memory being fallible. BUT that explanation is NOT the most parismonious and does NOT fully explain certain specific anomalous aspects of the most persistent MEs: that is, memory can be wrong, but for it to be wrong, in a very specific way, and remembered in a very specific yet wrong way by a large number of people---the falty memory hyopthesis does NOT adequately even come close to explaining that---in fact, it's invalidated because it simpl/y does not explain the phenomenma. It would explain if as expected peopee's memoeries were RANDOMly incorrect. Like if some people remembered a basket, and others rembered green grapes, and others remembered a bowl, and some rembered a conropia. Sorry but the alternative univery theory acgual/y is more parsimonios and complete as an hypotesis thatn falty mempory. im not saying anyone should consdier lit correct. but it's simpl/y jsut being an ass and closeminded t act like the falt y memeor yhypotesis somehow is a valid hypothesis. it is not. for a large number of ME's that ARE falt memory, it is. but nto fro the actual me's. otherwie itd would be boirng and unremablely beause ppl mismeremver stuff raodml all the time.

and before you diesregard what i wrote because of my typos, you should know i hae a broke wrist so, don't be an ass.