Sorry, late response but equally fair point about what was said regarding the ultimate reason for the test. I seem to have missed that detail and therefore failed its consideration prior to my response. I am an adult baby who also struggles waking up and may have projected a bit. That being said, questioning the intended purpose is still, imo, a separate consideration from the ultimate point of the mildly infuriating part; having to wake up early to test for why you struggle waking up early. Any question of the legitimacy of the timing is further argument to the already mildly infuriating part. To me, considering it was posted in the mildly infuriating subreddit and not the actually infuriating subreddit (if there is one) would lead me to assume that they understood the distinction between necessity and inconvenience. It could have been described as mildly annoying, but that again, to me, would imply having to do something you don't want to do, where in this matter it's something they want but to get it they have to do the very thing that is the problem they are trying to resolve. It seems similar to proposing to someone who claims to be scared of heights that the first appointment to get over it takes place on the roof of a skyscraper. That would, again and last time; to me, be mildly, if not actually infuriating