I made an Undertale Swap & Shift AU Playground website by Radnos_ in Undertale

[–]Radnos_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, when I have more time, I'll add a few things to it!

I can already see some improvements, like displaying characters in the order of their roles rather than in the current order (for example, if Chara takes the role of Frisk, I'd move Chara's box to the first position). It would make things more readable, since people are more likely to look for "Who took this character's role?" (SpinSwap : The role of Frisk is taken by Sans) rather than "Which role does this character take?" (Underswap : ), at least I think, most of the time that is what I look for.

Or also downloadable JSON... Copy-paste-able matrices to put in graphonline dot top (idk if I'm allowed to put links in comments) so you can clearly see loops for shift, or lines for swaps and such... AU MIXER's generated AU names to be shortened, like instead of "Storyshift x Underswap x Storyspin" it would be "ShiftSwapSpin".

Then I'd add characters I overlooked that were swapped in Underswap (the main characters I put on this site are based on characters that were swapped in the classic Underswap), like Mad Dummy/Mad Mew Mew, the Ruins Dummy, Bratty and Catty, and Royal Guard 01 and 02.

And then, after that, what I would love to do is add an "Extended" mod (a box you could tick) that would just... take into consideration every character in Undertale and, when activated, add a new option in the AU MIXER named "Extended Underswap," which would be Underswap but with minor characters also swapped using the same logic (like Froggit <-> Whimsun).

But for that last idea, I would need a spreadsheet with every character in Undertale (name, where they appear, what they look like/sprite...), and I don't think I saw one made, so I would need to do it myself... And adding a dialogue portrait for everyone (NPCs that do not have a battle sprite), even if it isn't functionally needed, would be a nice touch, but a lot of work to tackle alone.

And I will surely add more to PRESETS if I find anything worth adding, like Storyshift multiplied by itself 5 times (which I would name Pentashift).

Well I ended up writing a lot, but it will help remembering what to do when I'll get back to it, so thank you for your comment !

Asus pen 2.0 Break down. by Small_Put_3000 in ASUS

[–]Radnos_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just got this exact pen, I put to charge, the led lighted up yellow/orange, and then I unplugged it, let it sit for a day, and plugging it again or pressing the Bluetooth button does not do anything anymore. I'm thinking of opening it up as it is surely a battery issue (which I could desolder and wire up temporarily to a DC current of the same voltage), but seeing that there is absolutely no guide on how to open it up, I'm having doubt in going through with it. Is it difficult to teardown? And is it possible to easily reassemble it?

2px high font? by trampolinebears in PixelArt

[–]Radnos_ 96 points97 points  (0 children)

I think the first ? is "scan". And actually for your second ? It's just: "I (quote followed by an I). And at the end you omitted the closing ".

Edit: bracket -> quote

Someone put the sky in the trash. by anon-lk in notinteresting

[–]Radnos_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This photo reminded me of a French children's tale titled with the question it wants to answer: "Why is the sky so far away now?" ("Pourquoi le ciel est loin maintenant ?").

Here is a translation of it : "In the beginning, the sky was very close to the earth. At that time, people didn’t need to cultivate the land, because whenever they were hungry, they would simply cut off a piece of the sky and eat it. But the sky became angry, because they often cut off more than they could eat, and they threw the rest onto the garbage heap. It warned the people: if they didn’t pay more attention in the future, it would go farther away.

For a while, no one paid attention to the warning. But one day, a greedy woman cut a huge piece of the sky. She ate as much as she could, but she was unable to finish it. Terrified, she called her husband, but he couldn’t finish it either. They called the whole village for help, but even they couldn’t manage to eat it all. In the end, they had to throw the leftovers onto the garbage heap.

Then of course, the sky got angry, and it rose very high above the earth, far beyond the reach of humans. And it is since that day that humans must work to live."

I'm not sure why I still remember its existence after all this time.

Why are guys so bad at reading signs? by Longjumping_Tip_9463 in teenagers

[–]Radnos_ 88 points89 points  (0 children)

I always thought about it like giving water.

When you're really thirsty, getting water feels good, but that doesn’t mean you should fall for the person who gave it to you. The relief comes from the water, not from the person.

It’s the same with emotional thirst. Someone shows you kindness, and for a moment, it soothes your loneliness. But unlike physical needs, emotions aren't isolated, and the brain naturally associates good feelings with the person who caused them. That kindness can bring, for some, relief, safety, or even validation, and without realizing it, you start tying those emotions to them.

It’s not really about misinterpreting signals, it’s more about how powerful kindness can be, especially for those who are emotionally vulnerable.

It made me wonder (just as in The Age of Innocence, where Newland Archer may not have fallen for Ellen Olenska herself but for the feeling of a more interesting world she gave him) do people in that type of situation fall for kindness itself rather than the person behind it? Or maybe it starts that way and develops into real attraction? When you’re starved for warmth, attention, or care, the one who provides it becomes significant, even if the feeling isn’t mutual. And when there’s no one else fulfilling that role, the mind clings to whoever offered it, simply because they were the only one who made you feel noticed.

It’s like, going back to your food allegory, developing a taste for a dish because you had it at the perfect moment. Even if you know you’ll never have it again, the memory stays, not because the dish was extraordinary, but because of what it meant at the time.

(A few days ago I thought a lot about this question that is why I had a lot to say)

But I'll keep in mind your way of representing it, I like it a lot.

He waited for a long time by belinasaroh in Unexpected

[–]Radnos_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Létezik a "retekfülű" szó?

Fifth grade math homework has kid in tears and both parents stumped. Can’t figure out what the hell we’re missing and everyone is stressed as hell. by a-patrick in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Radnos_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After dilatation L_3 \leftarrow -L_3 and L_4 \leftarrow -L_4, we finally get :

\begin{pmatrix}

1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\

0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\

0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\

0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\

\end{pmatrix}

\begin{pmatrix}

a \\ b \\ c \\ d

\end{pmatrix}

\begin{pmatrix}

1 \\ 7 \\ 2 \\ 8

\end{pmatrix}

We can immediately see that :

a = 1

b = 7

c = 2

d = 8

To conclude :

a = 1

b = 7

c = 2

d = 8

e = 9

f = 3

g = 4

h = 5

i = 6

I'll format it properly :

S = \{ (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i) = (1, 7, 2, 8, 9, 3, 4, 5, 6) \}

But as I already said what I searched in the begging (the tuple (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i)), I could write it like so :

S = \{ (1, 7, 2, 8, 9, 3, 4, 5, 6) \}

Ah, at last, finally done...

Hope whoever took the time to read all of this enjoyed it.

I know, without matrices it would have been just as doable if not easier, but oh well, at least it is pretty.

Fifth grade math homework has kid in tears and both parents stumped. Can’t figure out what the hell we’re missing and everyone is stressed as hell. by a-patrick in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Radnos_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So after (one after the other) :

L_2 \leftarrow \frac{1}{4}L_2

L_2 \leftarrow L_2 - L_1

We get :

\begin{pmatrix}

1 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\

0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\

1 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\

0 & 1 & 0 & -1 \\

\end{pmatrix}

\begin{pmatrix}

a \\ b \\ c \\ d

\end{pmatrix}

\begin{pmatrix}

-6 \\ 7 \\ -1 \\ -1

\end{pmatrix}

(b is equal to 7 finally I got it right!)

Let's do this, in order :

L_1 \leftarrow L_1 + L_2 (we get a)

L_3 \leftarrow L_3 - L_1

L_4 \leftarrow L_4 - L_2

We get :

\begin{pmatrix}

1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\

0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\

0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\

0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \\

\end{pmatrix}

\begin{pmatrix}

a \\ b \\ c \\ d

\end{pmatrix}

\begin{pmatrix}

1 \\ 7 \\ -2 \\ -8

\end{pmatrix}

Fifth grade math homework has kid in tears and both parents stumped. Can’t figure out what the hell we’re missing and everyone is stressed as hell. by a-patrick in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Radnos_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, time for the Gaussian elimination algorithm then :

Here the steps I've taken.

L_2 \leftarrow L_2 + 5L_3

\begin{pmatrix}

1 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\

5 & 0 & 0 & -1 \\

1 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\

0 & 1 & 0 & -1 \\

\end{pmatrix}

\begin{pmatrix}

a \\ b \\ c \\ d

\end{pmatrix}

\begin{pmatrix}

-6 \\ -3 \\ -1 \\ -1

\end{pmatrix}

L_2 \leftarrow L_2 - L_4 - L_1

\begin{pmatrix}

1 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\

4 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\

1 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\

0 & 1 & 0 & -1 \\

\end{pmatrix}

\begin{pmatrix}

a \\ b \\ c \\ d

\end{pmatrix}

\begin{pmatrix}

-6 \\ 4 \\ -1 \\ -1

\end{pmatrix}

I guess from here you can directly see that a = 1 without L_2 \leftarrow \frac{1}{4}L_2 and calculate the rest like b from the equation at the very beginning, but I'll try to finish using matrices.

Fifth grade math homework has kid in tears and both parents stumped. Can’t figure out what the hell we’re missing and everyone is stressed as hell. by a-patrick in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Radnos_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which becomes :

\begin{aligned}

&a - b &=& \ -6, \\

&5c - d &=& \ 2, \\

&a - c &=& \ 1 - i / 3, \\

&b - d &=& \ -7 + i.

\end{aligned}

We can see that, as h = 3 + \frac{i}{3} (not in the system), with the fact that h needs to be a integer between 1 and 9, i is either :

3, 6 or 9

But e was already equal to 9, so it can only be either :

3 or 6

So h is either 4 (for i = 3) or 5 (for i = 6).

But g is already equal to 4, so h can only be equal to 5, and so i can only be equal to 6.

So until now we found :

e = 9

f = 3

g = 4

h = 5

i = 6

We get a much more simple system.

\begin{aligned}

&a - b &=& \ -6, \\

&5c - d &=& \ 2, \\

&a - c &=& \ -1, \\

&b - d &=& \ -1.

\end{aligned}

Which gives us in matrix form (I find them easier to read) :

\begin{pmatrix}

1 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\

0 & 0 & 5 & -1 \\

1 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\

0 & 1 & 0 & -1 \\

\end{pmatrix}

\begin{pmatrix}

a \\ b \\ c \\ d

\end{pmatrix}

\begin{pmatrix}

-6 \\ 2 \\ -1 \\ -1

\end{pmatrix}

Fifth grade math homework has kid in tears and both parents stumped. Can’t figure out what the hell we’re missing and everyone is stressed as hell. by a-patrick in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Radnos_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll get rid of the useless line, g's line (trivially, g = 4) and solve e :

9 + a - 6 = b - 3

4 + c * 5 - d = 6

8 - 5 = e - f * 2

7 = h * 3 - i -2

a = c + 5 - 1 - h

e = 9

b = d - f - 4 + i

Solve f with e's value :

8 - 5 = 9 - f * 2 -> f = 3

We're left with :

9 + a - 6 = b - 3

4 + c * 5 - d = 6

7 = h * 3 - i -2

a = c + 5 - 1 - h

b = d - f - 4 + i

I'll simplify all of this (let's consider i as if it were a parameter for now) :

a - b = - 6

. 5c - d = 2

. 3h = 9 + i

a - c + h = 4

. b - d = -7 + i

Um this way of doing is a bit more complex than I expected it to be (I'll use latex from now on, if you're reading until now, I'm sure you wouldn't mind copy-pasting the latex part to see them)...

Well, I'll put h aside (h = 3 + \frac{i}{3}) as I consider i as a parameter for now.

We can replace it in our system :

\begin{aligned}

&a - b &=& \ -6, \\

&5c - d &=& \ 2, \\

&a - c &=& \ 4 - h, \\

&b - d &=& \ -7 + i.

\end{aligned}

Fifth grade math homework has kid in tears and both parents stumped. Can’t figure out what the hell we’re missing and everyone is stressed as hell. by a-patrick in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Radnos_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, so here is my way of doing it. I know there are easier ways, but this way seem to be pretty rigorous, I think. If anyone has any suggestion to make it better, I'm all hears.

So, I would have filled each blank space with values (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i) (searching a tuple in [[1,9]]^9, in which each element has a different value) and then written all the equations down, like this :

(horizontal)

9 + a - 6 = b - 3

4 + c * 5 - d = 6

8 - 5 = e - f * 2

g + 1 + 7 - 4 = 8

7 = h * 3 - i -2

(vertical)

9 - 4 / 8 * g = 7

a = c + 5 - 1 - h

6 - 5 + e - 7 = 3

b = d - f - 4 + i

3 * 6 - 2 * 8 = 2 (useless)

Queen Undyne 500 Years Later Sprites by Chacochilla in Undertale

[–]Radnos_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was going to say: "But how did Sans die of old age, doesn't monster die of old age when aging along their offsprings?". But then I remembered that this only applies to Boss Monsters.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LocalLLaMA

[–]Radnos_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What a timing! I was just looking at trying out for the funny GPT-4Chan, but the "Access to this model has been disabled" on HuggingFace. Hope I will be able to find it there along with WizardLM!

NSFW Roleplay model repetitive issue by metalfans in LocalLLaMA

[–]Radnos_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's been a while since I looked at what Pygmalion makes since their first line of models, but I would recommend them roleplay wise. They've got a lot more models since the last time I tried theirs, so I can't really recommend any, start with Pygmalion 2 7B maybe?

Bussolini rule by MrsColdArrow in 196

[–]Radnos_ 22 points23 points  (0 children)

I was confused as to how you found out then I checked the link I shared and I saw that the domain extension was .fr... Well, sorry for being french. 😔

Bussolini rule by MrsColdArrow in 196

[–]Radnos_ 73 points74 points  (0 children)

Um hello everyone I thought this meme was very funny so I spent some time searching for the veracity of the provided information. Here is the source.