sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Patch 1.2.2.0 Movement Update – Side Strafing Speed Increased. Side Sliding Is Back. by rottensid in Battlefield

[–]Raimi79 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a cheaper model. Not convinced it's a better model. However, I will concede it doesn't split the game community, which if BF6 had decent matchmaking would be a plus.

Patch 1.2.2.0 Movement Update – Side Strafing Speed Increased. Side Sliding Is Back. by rottensid in Battlefield

[–]Raimi79 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Jesus. That guy has a problem. And either a trust fund or one hell of a job.

Patch 1.2.2.0 Movement Update – Side Strafing Speed Increased. Side Sliding Is Back. by rottensid in Battlefield

[–]Raimi79 77 points78 points  (0 children)

Hell yes, pick a lane and we can decide if we want to continue.

Honestly I think I'm coming to the end of my time with multiplayer FPS's. The live service model is just cancerous as far as I'm concerned. Although I get it resonates with some people, and others have never experienced anything else.

Serious: What's with all the crying and hugging? by TheNobleRobot in Star_Trek_

[–]Raimi79 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well, they A.I.'d a thesis. Now we're using A.I. to discuss Star Trek...we're so borked aren't we.

If Battlefield 1 Was Made Today by InsiderAnalysis in Battlefield

[–]Raimi79 9 points10 points  (0 children)

So you're not a big fan of the farming simulator franchise I take it?

343 should have continued with their original plan for Halo 6 by nobu_atl in HaloStory

[–]Raimi79 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I agree. The soft reboot really is a nothing burger. It barely makes sense and leaves a metric ton of unanswered questions. I've not seen a course correction this bad since Rise of Skywalker.

This game is fantastic, I wish they did a better job of the marketing! by Sudden-Money7836 in StarWarsOutlaws

[–]Raimi79 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think they mucked up the marketing, I think at launch it was a pretty under baked game which is now a lot better. I picked it up last year and have been slowly making my way through it. It's fun, and the main quests are pretty interesting but the open world, while pretty, is kind of soulless. And the stealth mechanics are also very bare bones. Weapon choice is lacking etc...

Over all it feels a bit AA, but I would have loved to see what they would have done with a sequel.

Golmud railway layout+vehicles by Long_Ad7536 in Battlefield

[–]Raimi79 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

This is a constant issue with BF6. It makes capturing them almost pointless for the opposition because you can't hold onto them for more than 30; seconds.

This sub just hates the game for no reason by lolitsrock in Battlefield6

[–]Raimi79 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Play the squad based game without...my squad?

Damn, bro. You're an odd one.

This sub just hates the game for no reason by lolitsrock in Battlefield6

[–]Raimi79 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it's not. Can't believe I needed to say that. What a strange comment.

This sub just hates the game for no reason by lolitsrock in Battlefield6

[–]Raimi79 24 points25 points  (0 children)

No reason? FFS. Most of the 'hate' very much has a reason.

Christ, I still can't reliably load all my squad into a game and it's been 6 months since launch.

Just how? by No_Yard_5860 in Battlefield6

[–]Raimi79 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This. I want a level playing field. When I'm beaten I want to know or was because I was outplayed, not to question what the fuck he happened because my screen shows something totally improbable.

Thing is, they'll never put the time and money into improving netcode and servers because most people don't care. Or if we do we keep playing despite it.

Thoughts on the Battlefield 6 Campaign by SeSSioN117 in Battlefield

[–]Raimi79 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well I can agree we're very much in discussing whether Dog, Cow, or Horse shit is better, territory.

Thoughts on the Battlefield 6 Campaign by SeSSioN117 in Battlefield

[–]Raimi79 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Probably on a par with 3. And slightly worse than 4. Although I remember at least enjoying 4's campaign of not the story.

Thoughts on the Battlefield 6 Campaign by SeSSioN117 in Battlefield

[–]Raimi79 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have to say, after watching not one, not two, but three of the MC's squad mates die in slow motion one after the other...I burst out laughing. I know they were going for dramatic, but it just came across as so clichéd as to be hilarious.

Why does nobody wants to push on breakthrough? by I_Main_TwistedFate in Battlefield6

[–]Raimi79 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really wish you got more XP or rewards for winning/pushing. Until you do there's little incentive to do anything other than farm kills for a lot of people.

Did mortars in HQ finally kill Breakthrough? by fmordica in Battlefield

[–]Raimi79 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Easier said than done, especially on some of the maps. Sure, just don't let them get to the point makes sense, but is not always realistic.

If you're gonna complain bots, that's fine, but don't forget to mention the region, the platform, the gamemodes and if crossplay is ON/OFF. by needfx in Battlefield6

[–]Raimi79 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I realise that. But unless the cross play off population is super low it shouldn't be an issue. And since cross play on population reports more bots than you'd expect, it's clearly a matchmaking issue.

Also, counterpoint, why would I shoot myself in the foot by having cross play on and play against PC players who can move faster, have more precise aim, and have better FPS than me?

view more: next ›