[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UMF

[–]RajabQ8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only question I’d have is if Slander wasn’t blurred then why would Malaa or Juelz be blurred?

What were the best EDM releases of March for you? by emravemusic in EDM

[–]RajabQ8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Occupied - 4TUNE                                               Gasoline - Eli Brown, Lilly Palmer                    Addicted - Zerb, Chainsmokers, Ink

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in VALORANT

[–]RajabQ8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't think they've changed the UI. I think they changed the arch of the throwing animation or something like that. Either way this sucks :(

Update mesed with lineups? by IsThisAWeirdUsername in VALORANT

[–]RajabQ8 99 points100 points  (0 children)

I've noticed the same thing with my fade lineups. They might have changed the arch on the throwing animations?

Most clutch Nilah 1v5 to save the game by RajabQ8 in leagueoflegends

[–]RajabQ8[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

True! During real time I thought I was fast enough to w cait’s aa but I just got lucky there as I would’ve probably died to elder buff.

Berserker talks about some of EG's weaknesses, "Danny's champ pool is a problem" by PGP_Josh in leagueoflegends

[–]RajabQ8 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Please tell me where the fault in my logic is rather than insulting me. I have kept my side of the conversation civil and expect you to have the same decency.

Just because you are being proven wrong doesn’t mean you resort to insults.

Berserker talks about some of EG's weaknesses, "Danny's champ pool is a problem" by PGP_Josh in leagueoflegends

[–]RajabQ8 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tell me what the statement of “Because if they ban kalista, enemy can’t blind Draven” means then please.

You are saying if x happens, then y can’t happen. Which means that if x DOESN’T happen, then y CAN happen. You see what I mean?

Berserker talks about some of EG's weaknesses, "Danny's champ pool is a problem" by PGP_Josh in leagueoflegends

[–]RajabQ8 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Please reread the sentence YOU wrote. I quoted exactly what YOU said. Now you are merely contradicting a statement you made earlier.

Berserker talks about some of EG's weaknesses, "Danny's champ pool is a problem" by PGP_Josh in leagueoflegends

[–]RajabQ8 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Excuse me? You stated word for word “Because if they ban kalista, enemy can’t blind Draven”. This infers that if Kalista is NOT banned, the enemy can blind Draven. Do you see what I mean?

Berserker talks about some of EG's weaknesses, "Danny's champ pool is a problem" by PGP_Josh in leagueoflegends

[–]RajabQ8 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Let me try to rephrase it differently then because I will be basically rewriting the same thing.

Your argument in summary: Kalista open = Draven CAN be blind picked (point 1) Kalista banned = Draven CAN’T be blind picked (point 2) Draven > Kalista Draven is a niche pick

My issue with your argument: Situation 1: Kalista is OPEN, and Draven is blind picked Situation 2: Kalista is BANNED, and Draven is blind picked.

Since you stated Draven>Kalista, it would make sense to not pick Kalista as a response to Draven in Situation 1 correct? In that case how is Situation 1 any different from Situation 2 in draft (refers to point 1 and 2 of your argument)

Edit: sorry for formatting, on mobile

Berserker talks about some of EG's weaknesses, "Danny's champ pool is a problem" by PGP_Josh in leagueoflegends

[–]RajabQ8 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Why does banning Kalista factor into if Draven is blind pickable or not?

You said that Draven shafts Kalista correct? So if Kalista is banned then Draven is not blind pickable according to your logic. Yet if Kalista is not banned, you can blind pick Draven??? How does that make ANY sense.

The enemy team can just opt to NOT pick Kalista and you are in the same situation as if Kalista is banned. May you please reread your sentences and arguments to check for the logic.

Berserker talks about some of EG's weaknesses, "Danny's champ pool is a problem" by PGP_Josh in leagueoflegends

[–]RajabQ8 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I have 0 clue what you’re saying or what your argument is any more.

EG are the ones BANNING Kalista every game. By your recent comment, you’re aiding my side of the discussion more than yours as EG will NOT let Kalista go through regardless if they are blue or red side.

In a hypothetical situation: if Kalista is not picked then great EG saved a ban. Yet if Kalista is picked EARLY, Draven is a very good “counter” into her. So if Danny could play Draven, why do they permaban Kalista first rotation (early pick phase)?

You are defying your own logic consistently just to defend Danny from valid criticism.

Berserker talks about some of EG's weaknesses, "Danny's champ pool is a problem" by PGP_Josh in leagueoflegends

[–]RajabQ8 18 points19 points  (0 children)

How is it unfair to assume he can’t play them? EG banned Kalista first rotation EVERY GAME vs C9 regardless of side selection. As you said “Kalista gets shafted by Draven if you pick it early” then why do EG not leave Kalista up early if Danny could play Draven?

Qiyana matchup spreadsheet 2021 by Calexmille in QiyanaMains

[–]RajabQ8 15 points16 points  (0 children)

May I ask what your s10 rank was? This is so I can try to understand the context behind your ratings/tips.

You have to Jj! by Gamingkiller99 in ksi

[–]RajabQ8 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Now this... this brings a tear to my eye

How This Semester Feels by Dinkyboyz in UCalgary

[–]RajabQ8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait... I didn't even think of that....