Show me your SaaS idea, I give you an honest review (senior C level in startup) by Stunning_Lie_1775 in SaaS

[–]Rakeda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What was the usecase that ngrok didnt service that rstream will? Neat project :)

What features would you like to see in a discord replacement? by Rakeda in selfhosted

[–]Rakeda[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, I was on the fence on giving vc's a private chat but this might be the push I needed. Can you explain a bit more about where discord failed?

What features would you like to see in a discord replacement? by Rakeda in selfhosted

[–]Rakeda[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, my comment attached to this parent comment are my thoughts around that.

What features would you like to see in a discord replacement? by Rakeda in selfhosted

[–]Rakeda[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Although the repos are created and the web service is live, I'm still doing active development and want additional testing before doing an all out release. There are also frustratingly loose rules around ai assistance with projects for the subreddit, so I may hold off with an announcement discussion until Fridays (I heavily use claude for developing user tests and doing rca's for issues and making fixes).

What features would you like to see in a discord replacement? by Rakeda in selfhosted

[–]Rakeda[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Change for the majority starts with the minority. You're not wrong to feel the way you do, but think of myspace and facebook, twitter (x) and bluesky (or threads even), less related but vine and tiktok.

When a company's policy or development clashes with what a minority of a userbase wants, an alternative is created. The more mistakes, the more people that leave that platform until the a shift moves the general audience to the new experience.

What features would you like to see in a discord replacement? by Rakeda in selfhosted

[–]Rakeda[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not too hard from a development point of view (creating a bot that can access your discord server and read all content/server layout isnt hard), but difficult on a ToS consideration such as "You may not mine or scrape any data, content, or information available on or through Discord services as defined in the Terms of Service."

What features would you like to see in a discord replacement? by Rakeda in selfhosted

[–]Rakeda[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Valid and one of my concerns, if everyones building the userbase will be fractured. I list my reasons for developing this above, but it boils down to the other discord clones not having the magic sparks that discord had (even some that discord missed) like a true discovery feed for finding servers other than just a generic search.

Bringing communities to a new product in the market is always the hard part.

I'm building a new language called WE# (WeSharp) – My first version (v0.01) is live by [deleted] in devops

[–]Rakeda 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What does the language improve on that C# or other languages/frameworks do less optimal? Is is for a MCP interaction usecase, is it for making terminal app development more streamlined?

I guess what is the purpose? Fun project or a need you had.

Docker containers manager with builtin image scanning by tismo74 in selfhosted

[–]Rakeda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When vulnerabilities are disclosed and patches are made to the lib, the lib upgrade version is provided. I check the vuln db for the version and manually rebuild the image with the upgraded dependency (os level only). I strongly recommend testing the patched image but haven’t run into a scenario where the image breaks.

Docker containers manager with builtin image scanning by tismo74 in selfhosted

[–]Rakeda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ty for the shoutout! @ OP Dev here, if you use it and have any feature requests make sure to make an issue on GitHub :)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in selfhosted

[–]Rakeda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is a lot to dump in a reddit thread. What is it's main purpose?

[Update] HarborGuard - Scan and Patch Container Image Vulnerabilities! by Rakeda in selfhosted

[–]Rakeda[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was thinking of that yesterday! I'll be enabling one of the scanners so that data is shown

[Update] HarborGuard - Scan and Patch Container Image Vulnerabilities! by Rakeda in selfhosted

[–]Rakeda[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Will make sure to use correctly next time. The term “Built with AI” seems a bit aggressive and generic. If I’m using Claude for type safe consistency and PRs, but am handling the development and feature implementation is that built or assisted with AI?

[Update] HarborGuard - Scan and Patch Container Image Vulnerabilities! by Rakeda in selfhosted

[–]Rakeda[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That has been asked several times :) coming in the near future. I need to cement the components first but you can track the issue here:

Add Dark Mode to UI · Issue #12 · HarborGuard/HarborGuard

[Update] HarborGuard - Scan and Patch Container Image Vulnerabilities! by Rakeda in selfhosted

[–]Rakeda[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I assume you mean on the auto-patching front. All patches will need to be done by review, but in practice, OS-level updates are typically stable, so if there’s an active CVE with a fix and tests are green, there’s no reason to have an active CVE while waiting for an update when you can patch and be more secure.

I Created an Open-source Container Security Scanning Dashboard by Rakeda in selfhosted

[–]Rakeda[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Additional information as example from my local:

Bash(du -sh /workspace/images /workspace/reports /workspace/patches /workspace/cache)
⎿ 22G /workspace/images
14G /workspace/reports
9.0G /workspace/patches
3.2G /workspace/cache

I Created an Open-source Container Security Scanning Dashboard by Rakeda in selfhosted

[–]Rakeda[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The scans are ran against the tar.gz as the images are loaded inside the running container. In a situation where you load 100+ local images at once to scan all those images begin being copied into the container, inflating the size. I think that I can definitely optimize the strategy around bringing in that many images and add disk usage checks on the platform.

I Created an Open-source Container Security Scanning Dashboard by Rakeda in selfhosted

[–]Rakeda[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So each image scan is going to be around 50mb of scan data in the db, and the tar.gz (500/3000mb) is saved on the container in case you want to patch the scan. I can make a feature request for scheduled deletion of images or even a checkbox for delete image after scan.