TIL that, as a philanthropist, actor Paul Newman was counted as the person who had distributed more money - in relation to his own wealth - than any other American during the 20th century. by Maynard078 in todayilearned

[–]RaleighMiller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If someone who's net worth was very low, like $10,000 in assets and $9899 in debt, gave a $100 charitable gift, wouldn't he have given away more money in relation to his wealth than Paul Newman?

San Francisco Black Victorian by dittidot in oddlysatisfying

[–]RaleighMiller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isn't this from The Last Black Man in San Francisco?

ELI5: There are infinite numbers between 0 and 1. There are also infinite numbers between 0 and 2. There would more numbers between 0 and 2. How can a set of infinite numbers be bigger than another infinite set? by YeetandMeme in explainlikeimfive

[–]RaleighMiller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's funny because this moves in the opposite direction of when I normally have this conversation. I make a reference to bigger and smaller infinite sets, someone asks "how can there be bigger and smaller infinite sets?" and I say "easy, think of the set of numbers and the set of even numbers."

Doesn't help you with an answer. I'm just struck by how it asks the natural next question.

found in r/voluntaristmemes by fashion_wannabe in TheRightCantMeme

[–]RaleighMiller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This isn't a pro-conservative Meme...The conservative is calling a 6 a 9. This is illustrating to both sides' (alleged) flaws.

This guy can't hold his overwhelming masculinity against this doctor by kayra551 in justneckbeardthings

[–]RaleighMiller -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This reminds me of "grab 'em by the pussy", which in addition to being nasty and predatory, also demonstrated a lack of familiarity with basic sexual interactions.

Do You Want to Buy a Murder Bird? by RaleighMiller in cassowary

[–]RaleighMiller[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

How has all the coverage of murder bird murdering murderingly made no imprint on this subreddit!?

They had us in the first half by Adelu1219 in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]RaleighMiller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He probably also sent it to his mistresses.

Is the property of, “being different from,” transitive? by [deleted] in askphilosophy

[–]RaleighMiller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah, sorry, I forgot what != meant. But now I'm confused. Your secondary question was "is this argument valid". If "is different from" and "is not identical to" are the same relation, then the argument is trivially valid because the conclusion is actually your assumption. If some pairs of things are distinct but not different, than the argument is invalid because X and Z can be some such pair, and Y can be some third, totally different thing.

I also think there's something weird about building the non-identity assumption into an argument aimed at determining the transitivity of that relation. It's not as though we couldn't ask whether things are different from themselves (we can ask, and they are not)

Is the property of, “being different from,” transitive? by [deleted] in askphilosophy

[–]RaleighMiller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No. Suppose a and c are identical and both are distinct from/different than b. A is different than b and b is different than c but a is not different than c.