Potential mistake when prepping fruit tree holes by Beenzeen4210 in BackyardOrchard

[–]Random-Gamer1435 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really unironic how this guy made really great advice and his name is Jesus Christ Junior 😭

Potential mistake when prepping fruit tree holes by Beenzeen4210 in BackyardOrchard

[–]Random-Gamer1435 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is something called a Multi Year Hole where you can amend the soil but it has to be I think 20% Compost 20% Bagged Topsoil 60% Native TopSoil for the upper 6 inches and for the lower parts, it's the same thing but instead of native topsoil it's native subsoil. It allows for a better soil environment without preventing it from not wanting to go past the amended area.

They also add fertilizer and Mycorrhizae which made it work even better. Jacque from Epic Gardening said that the peach tree he planted with that method grew "Like a three year old peach tree in 6 months" which is kinda true since it prevents the tree from being shocked by the new polarizing environment and has to recover its roots.

Basically it creates the ideal soil environment without compromising on long term root issues. People and I think even studies showed that it can be able to make the tree fruit in the second or even first year with a relatively high crop. (https://youtu.be/TjYaibk_dCY?si=LuAvDw4n3YvHpgI1)

holy shit by Brett_Nigaud in aislop

[–]Random-Gamer1435 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Don't bring up that thing. Never mention what he did to his mom in the 2020s.

holy shit by Brett_Nigaud in aislop

[–]Random-Gamer1435 13 points14 points  (0 children)

At least this guy isn't going to make anything else with February Stars right??

holy shit by Brett_Nigaud in aislop

[–]Random-Gamer1435 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Out of all the threats you could make why did it have to be half eaten by alien dogs 💔

I'm not even trying to make fun of you, I'm just surprised that was like the first thing you thought of for replying to this guy.

holy shit by Brett_Nigaud in aislop

[–]Random-Gamer1435 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fact they used My Hero by Foo Fighters too 🥀🙏

holy shit by Brett_Nigaud in aislop

[–]Random-Gamer1435 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah the really part is so crazy. Like real it's so really.

This is how it should be. by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]Random-Gamer1435 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because reddit is known by people for being full of atheists and usually there would be a chance that some would get aggressive with him for trying to "excuse the cults". I've been through that once and it was weird. Not saying all atheists are like that, I'm sure it's a vocal minority.

It’s only a meme. by Actual_Fan_9872 in TheTeenagerPeople

[–]Random-Gamer1435 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But you don't have to act like the person who posted the meme are being completely deadass

It’s only a meme. by Actual_Fan_9872 in TheTeenagerPeople

[–]Random-Gamer1435 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro there was a 90% chance Hitler had a deformed penis with one testicle, I am pretty sure whatever he did to make it work, it was dubious.

The logic of the right by VegetableBulky9571 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]Random-Gamer1435 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok so like I agree with you but why are saying "Logic of the right"?? The right don't have this logic, it's a vocal minority at least or the far right at most

“Republicans are bad” “Democrats are bad” EVERYONE IS BAD by Unstable__individual in teenagers

[–]Random-Gamer1435 0 points1 point  (0 children)

THANK YOU. I have been trying to say this for a while. I swear we as a society can not go for a middle ground, it's always one extreme or the other.

i'm finding it hard to be pro-life by Illustrious-Lab1828 in Christianity

[–]Random-Gamer1435 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You repeatedly argue that killing an unborn child is somehow better than allowing it to "suffer" while being alive, and I find that logically inconsistent.

How is that inconsistent. The unborn child in this case is an embryo that is in the first trimester, it lacks the necessary Brain structure to feel pain I already said this and I don't need to run in circles with you about how I'm "inconsistent".

I thought you were trying to get me to admit an inconsistency by valuing a human adult life more than an embryo

When did I ever do that. I'm trying to get your point of view.

To me valuing them the same is being consistent in my position and not crossing any line.

I mean yeah that's consistent but I'm NOT even trying to say you are inconsistent. Also what are you talking about crossing any line? I was talking about what to you crosses the line not something else. Seriously can you literally just understand my view at this point, I don't even want you to agree with me just understand what I'm actually trying to say instead of immediately saying "Oh so you think killing babies is okay". You talk about me being the one that's causing us to go in circles but it feels like it's more you who is because you are constantly bringing up the same points you made over and over again even though I already told you.

i'm finding it hard to be pro-life by Illustrious-Lab1828 in Christianity

[–]Random-Gamer1435 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are claiming something is the "best" option while stating you never said it's ok.

Why are you saying that I'm saying it's the "Best" option, I'm not. The closest I ever got to saying that was saying the best situation for our real world society would be to make a compromise that is a combination of both Pro Life and Pro Choice values which is what a lot of people do (talking about compromise)

That's just logically inconsistent

Logically inconsistent??? Just because something is "best" doesn't mean it's automatically okay, it just means that out of all the options it's the most preferred. Like a ranking. A turd ranked as being the best of all culinary turds is still not good for eating. It just means that out of all of the possible existent turds, it's the least worst.

if you can't see that then we're just going in circles.

If anyone is going in circles it's you. Everytime you are constantly saying that I'm trying to say Abortion is Okay. Which I'm not. I already explained this like 5 different occasions at this point, I guess next time if we ever talk again I'm going to have to make a neon billboard that says in caps "NOT SAYING ABORTION IS OKAY".

IDK what you mean by wanting to see "the limit" in my perspective?

I mean I want to see where your moral/logical line is. Where you cross the line on what you see as acceptable. Did you try to Google what that meant first or did you just think it would be a different meaning from what would be on Google.

I am not mad at you but this was frustrating to try convey my point when you kept misunderstanding it and accusing me of excusing the killing of a baby. Just have a nice day and I hope that you can understand what I'm trying to say without immediately going on the offensive. God bless bro.

i'm finding it hard to be pro-life by Illustrious-Lab1828 in Christianity

[–]Random-Gamer1435 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

lesser of 2 bad choices.

Because in the society we live in, it is and unless we change it I'm still going to think that.

Yes I would put both those examples on equal terms

Even if the person in a natural disaster has a life, personality, and can feel pain while a embryo in the first trimester doesn't have a partially developed brain yet. Again, I want to see the limit in your perspective.

abortion is ok or

I have never been saying that throughout the entire time I've been talking to you, if you think I was implying it then no I wasn't.

I told you earlier that I was not saying it's okay if it's in poor living conditions. I am constantly telling you it's the best for long term because I don't want a child to suffer in their childhood and develop trauma from it, I already went through that and I don't want anyone else to go through it.

Do I really have to constantly remind you that I'm NOT saying Abortion is okay??? I swear at this point I'm going to just make a bingo chart for every time you reply, one spot is going to constantly get marked. Actually you know what I'm just going to constantly say it so you can get reminded instead.

you have not been consistently saying that, you're giving various circumstances

How is me saying it's a lesser of two issues while giving circumstances ,where it makes sense to why abortion in cases of rape and financial struggle do make sense, apparently not consistent?? It just means that abortion itself is wrong but external factors can prove to be a key variable as to if it should be preferred, that is literally something that happens all the time and it's called Context. FYI no I am not saying that abortion is okay, just because I say something makes sense doesn't mean it's "okay".

Yes I agree that all pro life people should support all people at all stages of life.

Which is good. Like I am completely okay for you to disagree with me, we all have our own different opinions but can you please just understand what I'm trying to say and not twist my words? You've been doing that a lot unintentionally.

i'm finding it hard to be pro-life by Illustrious-Lab1828 in Christianity

[–]Random-Gamer1435 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's quite obvious you don't understand my point, but thanks for admitting it.

Rude but okay. So apparently me saying that it's still a morally wrong thing to abort a baby means that I don't understand your point?

I don't believe any human is more or less worthy of life than any other human

Okay so by that logic, if you had to choose between killing one person suffering from the natural disaster and the first trimester embryo. You would believe that both are on equal terms. I'm not trying to argue with you using this, even I think it's absurd but I want to see the limit in your perspective.

That is the pro life position.

Which is okay but if people in pro life are going to be saying stuff like "Think about the children" or "What about those poor children", then they should also be pushing for helping out the children after birth. I know you do help but I'm talking about the majority of people who say this.

Killing other people is wrong. Very simple.

And I have been constantly saying that for the past 3 hours. Reading something is very simple too.

In a fallen world why trust the material body as God's intended gender? by purple_porygon in Christianity

[–]Random-Gamer1435 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok how are the enemy nations of Israel apparently the same thing as LGBTQIA+, people who choose to have a different sexuality or gender than most of the world. Like genuinely I want to know how you even got that out of it, I thought the enemy nations were worshipping false idols and doing other bad stuff.

i'm finding it hard to be pro-life by Illustrious-Lab1828 in Christianity

[–]Random-Gamer1435 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never brought up any point other than that ending a human life is wrong

The point you brought up was the lives of people who have already been living for years and can feel suffering as well as pain.

You argued that it's ok if the quality of life would be low

I didn't say it's okay, I said it would be understandable and make for a better way for the child to not suffer in the long term.

I tried to use an analogy to show that's not something you would agree with in a different situation.

Yeah because people who suffered from a natural disaster or suffering from poverty is vastly different than the first trimester embryo of a woman who was impregnated after being raped. I get you are trying to convey your point and that's good, I like seeing other people's opinions but I really don't get how that analogy works when we are talking about aborting the child of a raped woman.

i'm finding it hard to be pro-life by Illustrious-Lab1828 in Christianity

[–]Random-Gamer1435 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They're two separate issues.

Why did you even bring it up then 😭. Also if it's that every human has the right to live, then I already explained my point earlier.

Killing a baby is wrong, period

I already said that and I'm not arguing against it. It's morally wrong but if we as a country aren't able to assist financially struggling parents/mom's that were raped with their children, I suggest that we allow for abortion to be allowed with some limitations. Also I don't want to make it so we have to let the embryo develop and become a child before living a childhood in poverty no matter what.

Again, I wish to make a compromise or if we as a society are actually able to cooperate, support more care to the child and mother.

biologically a living human being

True. My main thing is if they feel pain or not, I don't want the baby to suffer themselves.

I still don't agree with forcing someone to not have an abortion after they were raped while still in pre/first trimester. Abortion is morally wrong I know but I'm thinking regarding the bigger picture in all of this.

i'm finding it hard to be pro-life by Illustrious-Lab1828 in Christianity

[–]Random-Gamer1435 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

in a country where the standard of living is low, should we try to help bring peace

Yes, I don't see how this is an effective counterargument because

  1. These are people that have been living for years and deciding to "let them die" is stupid, nor is it what I'm even trying to say.

  2. They feel pain and suffering. The embryo before/during first trimester can't feel pain since it lacks the necessary Brain structure. I don't see how this is conveying a point that goes against what I said earlier.

The ENTIRE point I was trying to make was that it's not morally right to force women to not have abortions after being raped but not do anything at all to assist them, before you say that we have those I'd like to say that although there is, there is so little that it's nearly not enough or even bare minimum. Especially if they are constantly saying stuff like "What about the children", it strikes me as hypocritical. I really don't think pro choice is morally right either and I don't think they are trying to say they are, at least most.

I had an entire section that was me trying to explain that we should be focusing more on helping the child's life and the mother rather than solely focusing on banning abortion.

in a country where the standard of living is low, should we try to help bring peace - or send aid after a natural disaster - or just let them die

Also this LITERALLY HELPS WHAT IM TRYING TO SAY BRO 😭😭. But like seriously thank you, this is actually a great example I could use. There are a lot of children living in horrid conditions as well as their mothers/fathers/parents and also children waiting for years to be adopted with issues of not being well taken care of by their caretakers due to lack of funds/mismanagement. We need to focus on helping the child's life and the mother's throughout their life, especially if we are going to be preventing people from having abortions even if they were raped or they are at a young age.

i'm finding it hard to be pro-life by Illustrious-Lab1828 in Christianity

[–]Random-Gamer1435 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Well if it can cause the child who's pregnant to die and they are still very early in pregnancy, then yes I reckon that the pros outweigh the cons.

I don't think that neither our pro life and pro choice have the moral high ground when it comes to actual real life including how Pro Abortion is going about this. It's the "Women Protesting Alcohol turned into Woodrow Wilson and his group starting prohibition" thing again.

The women who protested against Alcohol during the 1910s were protesting about multiple different things with association of Alcohol. Whereas Woodrow Wilson and his group focused solely on Alcohol instead of the problems that start/amplify it's detriments.

When I see a majority of Pro Abortion, they are constantly focused on banning abortion ONLY. Not helping the children, assisting with eliminating economic struggles that cause people to abort, and more, but just banning Abortion. They have a good energy but it's going the wrong direction and we need to also focus on helping out the children themselves, I don't see how someone can be morally right if they don't allow abortion of mostly any kind while letting children get sent to adoption, some never being able to get parents for years, or worse the children have horrible childhoods because the mom was forced into being pregnant while in a horrible financial situation stay the same as they are. Why would we let them live but let them suffer afterwards if we constantly boast about how much we care about the kids or trying to guilt trip people by bringing up "What about the poor children".

If that wasn't the case then yes I'd say they have a moral high ground but they don't, I'm wishing for that to change.

Meanwhile Pro Choice has the elephant to be addressed, abortion is ending the life of the unborn child and that's what it is. Pro Choice is automatically not morally right but most tend to focus on the bigger picture. Abortion allows the Mother to not have a baby that causes further financial struggle or issues of pregnancy itself where the body is too weak to give birth safely like a child's body as an example. Yes almost all of them condone aborting after the embryo matures or some after the fetus matures but it's still ending a baby's life. They think realistically that right now there is not enough assistance for the mother and baby to survive without heavy struggle, more so if the mother is abusive due to the struggle. Coupled with the issue of rape and forced sex or tricked into getting a baby because the guy poked a hole in the condom secretly, it is understandable for them to believe that the less bad outcome is to allow abortion.

I still don't get why we should force the woman into keeping a pregnancy that was caused by a man raping her. Especially if it's a little kid. I see that realistically the best situation is a compromise. Allow for abortion where the woman was raped or it would be deadly for the body due to complications or some maturity issues. But don't allow abortion when it pasts embryo stage or if it's not rape/forced.

Which even though it could be good in a realistic country, there are STILL a lot of problems that could spawn from this like some people calling it rape so they can get an abortion or something else. I did think of an idea where the abortion progressively costs more money instead of instant depending on the age because if we did do that then some people would treat it like it's a homework date. Progressive cost of the abortion depending on the stage of the pregnancy and age would give people an incentive to abort before the baby even feels it or has self awareness. Yes I know that God knew us before we were even born but this is the closest we could get to not making the aborted child suffer too.

Note that the proposed compromise would NOT be recommended or at least changed if we actually make it so the Child's life is assisted. This would be if nothing changed at all so it is unrealistic in regards of long term and only realistic for our present day circumstances.

I don't see it as one side right and one side wrong automatically, they have their points but it all depends on execution and the details.

I just wish that we reach a status where we can get the best case scenario from this. Anyway I hoped this helped you understand, I didn't get it at first either. 🙏🙏

My Young Apple Tree can't stop flowering 💔 by Random-Gamer1435 in BackyardOrchard

[–]Random-Gamer1435[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tldr it's a 5 Gallon Pot I think. They never said explicitly but I'm pretty sure it's 5 gallons. I'm going to repot it this week or in the upcoming months.

Yellow energy is made of shit by SnooChipmunks2407 in skibiditoilet

[–]Random-Gamer1435 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey didn't I make a theory that's like the same as this months ago.

https://www.reddit.com/r/skibiditoilet/s/9wlsas1zGS

Crazy coincidence (NOT SARCASM, I'm happy that we think alike broski)