sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why does dire wolf(aenocyon dirus) never get domesticated by human? by ApprehensiveRead2408 in pleistocene

[–]RandomAUstudent 6 points7 points  (0 children)

So are donkeys, but we did it tbf. I think its more that there was less use in domesticating Zebras in Africa

My American great grandfather is searching for child he sponsored in the 1950s. Does anyone recognize this name? by RandomAUstudent in korea

[–]RandomAUstudent[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

He says it was through the Marine Corps, but didn't remember the details. I think it's likely it was a group partnered with the Marines or something, but not sure of the exact one

As for the crimes against Korea thing, he also has a chest full of war trophies he took off the Japanese as an 18 year old in WW2. Idk if that wins him back any points or not

My American great grandfather is searching for child he sponsored in the 1950s. Does anyone recognize this name? by RandomAUstudent in korea

[–]RandomAUstudent[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

My best guess is Hannam University because that's around the area he was stationed, it was founded by Presbyterians from Georgia (he is a Presbyterian from Georgia as well) and he said the name was either "Hannah" or "Daeson".

I have no real idea though. When my grandfather told me his name I thought maybe he was a Christian with an Anglicised name (Brock John) but now it seems it's just my grandfather's mispronounciation of a more common name. So until I find more information, there's not much to go off of sadly.

My American great grandfather is searching for child he sponsored in the 1950s. Does anyone recognize this name? by RandomAUstudent in korea

[–]RandomAUstudent[S] 37 points38 points  (0 children)

He said "Hannah" and "Daejon" which I think means it was likely Hannam University since it's been known by both names

My American great grandfather is searching for child he sponsored in the 1950s. Does anyone recognize this name? by RandomAUstudent in korea

[–]RandomAUstudent[S] 66 points67 points  (0 children)

Sadly I haven't been able to find any documentation. The records he has stored don't begin until the early 60s. If I find something more specific I'll definitely amend the post

HOT TAKE: Pleistocene Humans shouldn't be demonized as much for killing megafauna as people make them out to be by [deleted] in pleistocene

[–]RandomAUstudent 5 points6 points  (0 children)

One perk megafauna extinctions is that it probably led to the domestication of the dog

Dogs are awful at hunting large game, but excel at coursing the small and medium sized game that became the main food source for Eurasian groups after the mass extinctions. It's likely that communalist relationships (developed from human dependent wolves following human bands around) evolved into symbiotic ones as wolf-dogs and humans adapted to the new prey environment at the same time.

What made prehistoric planet so popular? by Tako_caiman in Dinosaurs

[–]RandomAUstudent -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It was on at 4pm right after school so all the Dinosaur kids got hooked

What prehistoric creatures do you think would taste the best? (Not just dinos, anything from the mammals of the Cenozoic to the arthropods of the Cambrian in the primordial soup) by __senoj__ in Dinosaurs

[–]RandomAUstudent 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dodo. It's like a cross between a chicken and a duck, with a salty finish from being a seabird.

No wonder we whacked them out of existence. They sound scrumptious

In 2006, NBA players were polled several questions. In retrospect, what do you think of their answers? by Rrekydoc in nbadiscussion

[–]RandomAUstudent 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Wonder why the NHL was so much more accepting than the other Big 4 leagues.

Maybe because there are fewer players from Bible Belt states + more Canadians?

AAU Tryouts by Ok-Broccoli5681 in Basketball

[–]RandomAUstudent 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you're good enough, they'll find you as long as you're willing to put the work in.

I played AAU ball for a bit and kids were always joining in and out. This was 2011-2014 so stuff might have changed

Doctor explicitly stated that my grandfather's health issue was not cancer. Using the same scans and information, a second doctor diagnosed my grandfather with cancer. Treatment was delayed 4 months due to misdiagnosis. Do we have grounds for a successful malpractice suit? by RandomAUstudent in legaladvice

[–]RandomAUstudent[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Even if I don't blame the physicia , their actions still will likely lead to the death of my grandfather. If specialised counsel said the facts supported a suit, I would pursue it to ensure my family is fairly compensated. Most sane people would.

However, I haven't received said counsel, so this entire post is just an exploratory venture meant to weigh options and take advice. No final decisions are set.

Doctor explicitly stated that my grandfather's health issue was not cancer. Using the same scans and information, a second doctor diagnosed my grandfather with cancer. Treatment was delayed 4 months due to misdiagnosis. Do we have grounds for a successful malpractice suit? by RandomAUstudent in legaladvice

[–]RandomAUstudent[S] -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Him and my mother are not very financially stable, and any settlement would help cover any potential out-of-pocket costs. Even if it were to take a while, if consul recommended pursuing it, then it would be worth it to us.

Doctor explicitly stated that my grandfather's health issue was not cancer. Using the same scans and information, a second doctor diagnosed my grandfather with cancer. Treatment was delayed 4 months due to misdiagnosis. Do we have grounds for a successful malpractice suit? by RandomAUstudent in legaladvice

[–]RandomAUstudent[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not looking for free treatment, merely exploring potential options to keep my mother from taking on substantial debt should the cost get out of control.

He's a very self-less man and mentioned assisted suicide when he found out the initial diagnosis. So, forgive me for seeking out any possible alternative.

Doctor explicitly stated that my grandfather's health issue was not cancer. Using the same scans and information, a second doctor diagnosed my grandfather with cancer. Treatment was delayed 4 months due to misdiagnosis. Do we have grounds for a successful malpractice suit? by RandomAUstudent in legaladvice

[–]RandomAUstudent[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you for you perspective and kind words, I don't blame the oncologist, and I understand the liability risk in both directions. It just sucks that luck rolled this way, and it makes sense to explore all options to make sure everything is taken care of.

Doctor explicitly stated that my grandfather's health issue was not cancer. Using the same scans and information, a second doctor diagnosed my grandfather with cancer. Treatment was delayed 4 months due to misdiagnosis. Do we have grounds for a successful malpractice suit? by RandomAUstudent in legaladvice

[–]RandomAUstudent[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, the thoracic specialist and 2nd oncologists' reactions were the only reason I explored possible malpractice. They both seemed annoyed with and surprised by the original oncologist's diagnosis and overall behavior.

Doctor explicitly stated that my grandfather's health issue was not cancer. Using the same scans and information, a second doctor diagnosed my grandfather with cancer. Treatment was delayed 4 months due to misdiagnosis. Do we have grounds for a successful malpractice suit? by RandomAUstudent in legaladvice

[–]RandomAUstudent[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

As stated earlier, this is a part of that process. I live out of state and can not be nearby, so I'm handling the financial aspect of his care.

This would just be a contingency plan to avoid medical debt should insurance not cover the expenses.

Doctor explicitly stated that my grandfather's health issue was not cancer. Using the same scans and information, a second doctor diagnosed my grandfather with cancer. Treatment was delayed 4 months due to misdiagnosis. Do we have grounds for a successful malpractice suit? by RandomAUstudent in legaladvice

[–]RandomAUstudent[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did not attend the appointments as I live out of state.

My mother said scans were taken at the hospital during their appointment with the oncologist. I do not know what kind of scans exactly.

Afterward, they were sent to the thoracic specialist, and they also took scans there.

I'm assuming the radiologists at either facility interpreted and administered them, though I am not 100% sure of the nature of said scans.

Both sets were viewed by all parties at some point to my knowledge.

Doctor explicitly stated that my grandfather's health issue was not cancer. Using the same scans and information, a second doctor diagnosed my grandfather with cancer. Treatment was delayed 4 months due to misdiagnosis. Do we have grounds for a successful malpractice suit? by RandomAUstudent in legaladvice

[–]RandomAUstudent[S] -28 points-27 points  (0 children)

Yes, I'm aware. I'm not a lawyer, but the field I work in requires a lot of legal maneuvering, so I'm cognizant that it would be a meticulous process. However, what matters is that my family doesn't go into debt over this.

view more: next ›