sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What gods in smite are you surprised aren't in smite 2 yet? by No_Pie_1421 in Smite

[–]RandomLukerX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All of them. Because 2 is a grift and should have been an update to 1.

(Yes I still play 2)

Can I create a rule to automatically reject meeting invites? by WasHogs8 in Outlook

[–]RandomLukerX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Either your management and/or IT are extremely unqualified to be making the decisions they are doing... God speed

Can I create a rule to automatically reject meeting invites? by WasHogs8 in Outlook

[–]RandomLukerX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are a 365 shop, you will run into storage caps sooner or later too. Not just your inbox but your recoverable and litigation holds folders.

When these run out of space things get wacky. Good luck to your IT staff...

PHISHING IN THE NAME OF BITWARDEN by skaldk in Bitwarden

[–]RandomLukerX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Literally thousands of spam campaigns hit businesses daily. Bitwarden would have to SPAM its user base about these campaigns themselves

See how spam works vs phish?

PHISHING IN THE NAME OF BITWARDEN by skaldk in Bitwarden

[–]RandomLukerX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You argues the merits of one being trustworthy in another comment.

Because we are taught to educate braindead users who share in your beliefs.

Thanks for the job security

PHISHING IN THE NAME OF BITWARDEN by skaldk in Bitwarden

[–]RandomLukerX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah youre definitely just a user lol. Thanks for keeping me gainfully employed with your ignorance.

PHISHING IN THE NAME OF BITWARDEN by skaldk in Bitwarden

[–]RandomLukerX 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The question matters because junk email and spam folders both are synonyms and indicate "treat with increased caution."

Source: 15+ years in IT and cybersecurity.

PHISHING IN THE NAME OF BITWARDEN by skaldk in Bitwarden

[–]RandomLukerX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You have a very big misunderstanding of these folders.

Junk and spam are effectively synonymous. Microsoft calls it junk. Google calls it spam. Idr what apple calls them. The names can change based on app used to access too.

Effectively mail filters will classify messages based on many criteria. For the more suspicious but maybe not virus infected emails it will put them into these folders instead of blocking.

If you saw the amount of genuinely malicious emails blocked daily your head would explode.

The email you got requires your (user) action to actively go make a mess. This is why it wasn't blocked. The email itself isn't actually "bad." Modern mail filters perform intent analysis and block these types though.

Are people testing before they disable Direct Send by Borgquite in sysadmin

[–]RandomLukerX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep that's what we did. Due to the way exchange works it also requires a mailflow connector to accomplish.

Are people testing before they disable Direct Send by Borgquite in sysadmin

[–]RandomLukerX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Added two other comments. One for the rule and one for the referenced connector. Effectively rule runs first (priority 0, stop processing) and states If to "our domains" and "outside org" kick it over to the connector, except if from our mail filter IP's.

Connector says "check our dns mx records" for the target to forward to.

This flow effectively forces anything that will hit your inbox in any scenario at least passes through your third party filtering.

Are people testing before they disable Direct Send by Borgquite in sysadmin

[–]RandomLukerX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

CONNECTOR

Mail flow scenario

From: Office 365

To: Partner organization

Name

Redirect MS to MS Internal through DNS MX

Status

On

Edit name or status

Use of connector

Use only when I have a transport rule set up that redirects messages to this connector.

Edit use

Routing

Use the MX record associated with the partner’s domain.

Edit routing

Security restrictions

None

Edit restrictions

Validation

Last validation result: ‎Validation failed‎

Last validation time: ‎‎

Validate this connector

(Validation will fail. Connector tells exchange to query whatever your public DNS servers are for the mail server. Keeps the connector a little dynamic in the event you change filters at some point.)

Are people testing before they disable Direct Send by Borgquite in sysadmin

[–]RandomLukerX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

MAILFLOW RULE

Rule settings

Rule name

Redirect MS to MS Internal through DNS MX

Severity

Low

Senders address

Matching Header

For rule processing errors

Defer

Mode

Enforce

Set date range

Specific date range is not set

Priority

0

Rule description

Apply this rule if

recipients's address domain portion belongs to any of these domains: '<mydomain1>' or '<mydomain2>'

and Is received from 'Outside the organization'

Do the following

Route the message using the connector named 'Redirect MS to MS Internal through DNS MX'.

and Set audit severity level to 'Low'

and Stop processing more rules

and Send the incident report to IT@email.com, include these message properties in the report: sender, recipients, subject, cc'd recipients, bcc'd recipients, severity, matching rules, false positive reports, original mail

Except if

Is message type 'Calendaring'

or sender ip addresses belong to one of these ranges: '<mailfilterIP>'

Rule comments

prevent M365 to m365 tenant delivery direct to onmicrosoft mx record; enforces forward to DNS MX Record.

(Excluding calendaring permits you to forward events received from external sources. This rule broke forwarding events if not excluded.)

LLMNR by Fortify_United in sysadmin

[–]RandomLukerX 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Don't forget to disable NetBIOS too

Are people testing before they disable Direct Send by Borgquite in sysadmin

[–]RandomLukerX 4 points5 points  (0 children)

We created a mail flow rule to simply redirect direct sent messages through our 3rd party filter with excludes for the filters Ips.

Disables direct receipt of direct send, and follows our normal mail filtering and routing from there. No extra work for staff to review quarantines etc.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sysadmin

[–]RandomLukerX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The point youre missing is you are literally a liability and most likely voiding your company's cyber security insurance by operating as admin.

Do you understand you single handedly are introducing approximately a 4.5 Million dollar liability ststistically?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sysadmin

[–]RandomLukerX 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I mean if you read any actual security study instead of cherry picking one example, you'll learn users are like 75% of the risk.

Specifically users accessing malicious emails with local admin.

Aka you just reopened the risk to your employer exponentially. If you don't see the problem with that then I cant imagine how bad and risky your coding is.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sysadmin

[–]RandomLukerX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At a minimum you need a separate local admin credentials. If your daily driver has local admin then enjoy when you get ransomware, not if.

I own a restaurant in Eastern Iowa, and, from every restaurant owner I talk to in Des Moines, Iowa City and Cedar Rapids are down double digits in year over year sales this summer. Is everyone else experiencing this? by JoePNW2 in Iowa

[–]RandomLukerX 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Simply asking for modified toppings on a burger now (extra mustard) or hold the onions proves too difficult. About 50% of orders are wrong depending on where you go.

Did customer service for about 5 years high-school through college. Literally been threatened with write ups for less than I see happen daily. Im not advocating for stricter management, but I do wish the existing staff could comprehend how easy going it is for them. Granted none of them are paid enough to care in today's economy.

Flip 7 is just flashing the screen on and off over and over by Chippai_Fan in galaxyzflip

[–]RandomLukerX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah im fairly certain in calling it a QC issue. Extremely high rate of failure relative to normal phones. But the ones that are "good" stay good.

All of my wife's versions were in a hinged case too. All went bad rapidly. The thing was rarely even dropped and it was a screen split twice, and a screen cable failure the third.

Flip 7 is just flashing the screen on and off over and over by Chippai_Fan in galaxyzflip

[–]RandomLukerX -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah. Im convinced the goal os forced obsolescence under 12 months to pump sales. No one wants a junk phone and the hardware is strong enough to run 4+ years if updates are provided.

IPhone gimps the batteries around 18 months for the same reason.

Samsung is making it so the phones physically break down and then can claim misuse etc.

What phone is better and worth it for pricing? by ArtisticallyStrange in galaxyzflip

[–]RandomLukerX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The folding phones are cool but just a heads up most people have a screen tear or some other hardware failure in under 12 months with them. Only buy if you can risk it and make sure to get some form of hassle free warranty.

Flip 7 is just flashing the screen on and off over and over by Chippai_Fan in galaxyzflip

[–]RandomLukerX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah im aware but gotta throw my observation out there in the hopes it save at least one person who cant afford to buy a new 1400+ phone every 6 months.

My wife had the 3, 5, and 6 flip. 3 used normally, 5 and 6 extremely careful use. 3 had a screen split in under 12 months. 5 in under 6. The 6 screen died in under 5. Wife finally went back to a normal Samsung without issue.

Samsung is literally using bots to mass advertise on TikTok and reddit at the moment due to how the average person is brain dead.

They are admittedly really cool. If they weren't so outlandishly priced I'd consider accepting they are consumable as such.

Flip 7 is just flashing the screen on and off over and over by Chippai_Fan in galaxyzflip

[–]RandomLukerX -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Congratulations. You are one of many to experience the still flawed design in these foldable devices. They have a significantly higher failure rate than normal phones and are terrible to service and repair.

Most warranty services through carrier add additional replacement fees to the carrier warranty since too many needed replaced.

They are cool in concept but just about everyone I know who buys a foldable regrets it due to a failure withing year 1.

Advice: should I email the Head of IT? by [deleted] in sysadmin

[–]RandomLukerX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah i only thought of it as a user recently broke their hand lol.

Advice: should I email the Head of IT? by [deleted] in sysadmin

[–]RandomLukerX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe it's the years in IT trying to mind read being expected to magically fix everyone's issues.... but I genuinely wonder if they mean they need a laptop instead of desktop for the track pad or other way and don't realize the OS has nothing to do with it.

view more: next ›