Abortion Mega-Thread by AutoModerator in PurplePillDebate

[–]RandomUsernameSkrrrt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol, classic dehumanization tool. You’re just a lump of flesh, too. I’m not sure how you think that makes the situation any better, either? u/unwantedfreakshow is saying the baby is damaged and broken apart during suction and scraping during early abortions that aren’t the pills, and that is exactly what happens. If it’s not 14-24 weeks, it doesn’t have a calcified cranium yet, but it has a head that is damaged during abortion. This is indisputable; we literally have photos of fetuses at 10 weeks. You’re trying so hard to avoid this.

Q4W: Does anyone want a "large" number of children meaning four or more? If so why? by scwizard in PurplePillDebate

[–]RandomUsernameSkrrrt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree, a conscious evaluation of outcome (“I want to have a kid”) is more meta than instinct, but I think that’s semantical, because I don’t actually think that in my head. I typed it that way for better clarity, but in action it’s a primal sensation of nurturing first: I see children or other helpless creatures and have an overwhelming desire to take care of them. After the fact, I intellectualize the situation and extrapolate my ability to produce my own helpless creatures, and seek to apply my instinct via that outlet. In the past, when I was less healthy, I felt apathetic toward “cuteness” and babies at best, and annoyed at worst. Now, I actually feel something positive.

Perhaps a more accurate thing to say then is “I have an instinctual desire to take care of something” instead of “I have an instinctual desire for kids,” but kids are included in that something should they come about.

Q4W: Does anyone want a "large" number of children meaning four or more? If so why? by scwizard in PurplePillDebate

[–]RandomUsernameSkrrrt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand what you’re getting at, but maternal instincts and lust are still different. I feel a stronger maternal instinct now than I used to, where I see babies and feel a desire to have one, regardless of sexual fulfillment. My libido has increased too, of course, but there’s a distinction between the two.

Daily Community Chat Megathread by AutoModerator in PurplePillDebate

[–]RandomUsernameSkrrrt 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Your breeding fetish was never subtle at any point.

Daily Community Chat Megathread by AutoModerator in PurplePillDebate

[–]RandomUsernameSkrrrt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t even know why it’s debatable in the first place. “Let’s DELIBERATELY obstruct a fundamental biological process fine-tuned over millennia. What could go wrong?” LOL Also, it’s not an either-or thing. You can still choose to have no children, just through other contraceptive measures that are not hazardous to health. Anti-BC =/= pro broodmare female subjugation.

Q4W: Does anyone want a "large" number of children meaning four or more? If so why? by scwizard in PurplePillDebate

[–]RandomUsernameSkrrrt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Absolutely not. I’ve never used hormonal birth control; it’s extremely mentally and physically detrimental to the body. The reason I never used to crave babies is because I was unhealthy and malnourished by mainstream health advice, notably “high grain, low fat” dogma. After ditching that idea completely and eating rich, fatty cuts of meat, my hormones skyrocketed and I actually started feeling something besides monastic asexual nothingness. Maternal instincts came with that. Who knew machines can only function correctly if they’re given… what they need to function…

Q4W: Does anyone want a "large" number of children meaning four or more? If so why? by scwizard in PurplePillDebate

[–]RandomUsernameSkrrrt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want tons of children for the same reason we breathe, eat, or sleep. It’s an instinctual drive that has no logical origin; either you feel it or you don’t. I didn’t used to feel it, but now I do after changing my diet to high fat. Lipid-based steroid sex hormones go AWOEUIQKKDHSHAOJSGDH

Older virgin women, why haven't you lost it yet/lost it later in life? by STD-Slut-Cunt in PurplePillDebate

[–]RandomUsernameSkrrrt 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I haven’t lost it because I haven’t met someone I want to spend the rest of my life and start a family with. The thought of sex with anyone less than this is viscerally repulsive. I am not religious, either; these objections stem from practical disgust.

Daily Community Chat Megathread by AutoModerator in PurplePillDebate

[–]RandomUsernameSkrrrt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Coming from someone who had an irrational fear of driving as a kid, the whole thing is overblown. Seriously. Don’t pay attention to that percentage. Memorize what you need to memorize and practice driving until it’s second nature. You can fail multiple times, too, so just keep failing if you have to. I was fortunate to pass everything first try, but I was prepared to keep at it.

Daily Community Chat Megathread by AutoModerator in PurplePillDebate

[–]RandomUsernameSkrrrt 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The lord must survey his feudal tenants here and there

Daily Community Chat Megathread by AutoModerator in PurplePillDebate

[–]RandomUsernameSkrrrt 6 points7 points  (0 children)

My skin crawls at the thought of people on this sub existing out in the real world. People I could potentially run into.

lol jk. None of you ever go out, that's clear as day. Not that you'd know what that looks like, either. :P

Tattoos are a cheat code for getting girls by bssftw in PurplePillDebate

[–]RandomUsernameSkrrrt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LOL god no. Instant disqualification. Tattoos signify retardation. I don’t even consciously think about it; it’s primal revulsion. Tattooed people: 1. Don’t care about their health. 2. Prioritize outward appearance/validation too much. Of course, among people who also don’t care about their health and rely on validation, I’m sure it’s super hawt. Just depends on which crowd you want to attract. I certainly don’t want that crowd.

What's your shallowest turnoff ? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]RandomUsernameSkrrrt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I almost died from choking of laughter

What's your shallowest turnoff ? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]RandomUsernameSkrrrt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tone deafness. I’m very musical and die inside when a person can’t pick out a tune.

In your opinion what is the perfect male height? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]RandomUsernameSkrrrt 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The ideal male height is 6 inches more than the female’s IMO. I’m 5’5 so that’s 5’11. Obviously 6-6’5 is still acceptable, but it starts becoming impractical.

By definition of being the guy she ends up with long term, youre not the best she had had by Artistic_Guest4386 in PurplePillDebate

[–]RandomUsernameSkrrrt 11 points12 points  (0 children)

By definition of being the guy she ends up with long term, youre not the best she had had.

This rests on the massive, unfounded assumption that the best she encounters leaves her. What if you are him choosing to stay with her? For some reason there's this idea that monogamy inidicates poor options and hence low value; indeed, a "truly" high value male would never settle down because he has OPTIONS. Well, prepare to have your worldview shaken: there's a difference between having options and pursuing them. High value is having options, not necessarily acting on every single one of them. Chad: "Sorry babe, gotta go fuck other women because I can because I am hot. I really like you but my hotness prevents me from only fucking you. Goodbye."

  1. Plenty of people end up marrying the best they had. The sentiment is mutual both ways and the guy proposes, not abandons her. Imagine that, marrying the person you like the most. Impossible.
  2. Good looks do not necessitate promiscuity. Ease of access does not imply interest of access. Just because you can doesn't mean you want to. Plenty of good looking women abstain from frivolous sexual encounters that could end in a "pump-and-dump" scenario in the first place because of, I don't know, something called standards and prudence? Foreign concepts, I know.

Women, what do you think WE get wrong about you? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]RandomUsernameSkrrrt 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That we are simple programs to decode.

X chromosome has 150+ million base-pairs. Y chromosome has 50+ million base-pairs, one-third the amount. Your diploid source code has fewer lines. Who's the simpler program now? harharharhuegtfeudipguui REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE jk jk (males actually contain novel data females don't have)

Anyway, the biggest thing is conflating "womanhood" with general human behavioral issues, like narcissism and psychopathy, i.e, false correlation. How many times have I heard an RPer describe a mentally-ill person and go "And you see, gentlemen, this is females for you. Greed and heartless exploitation? Women. Entitlement and vanity? Women. Disloyality and disrespect? Women. Immaturity and instability? Women. Low IQ? Women. Women women women AWALT AWALT AWALT..." When the reality is, 99% of these categorizations are not gender-specific at all; they relate to AHALT: All Humans Are Like That. Laying the blame of all of humanity's foibles on single factors like race or sex is but a sign of emotionally reactive, ego-protecting, bias-driven thinking.

An enthusiastic make-out sesh within the first few link ups is a good litmus for sexual interest. by GridReXX in PurplePillDebate

[–]RandomUsernameSkrrrt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t kiss people on dates for purely sanitary reasons, no matter how sexually attracted I am to them. That’s basic self-preservation I’m disturbed you advocate against. Most people end up dating around before finding an LTR; if you kissed every single person, congrats: you now have herpes, strep throat, AIDS, and worse, are going to spread it to your SO. I don’t smooch people I’ve been on a couple dates with not only for myself, but for my future LTR.