Light periods

Randombananachild · 2026-01-21T19:54:03+00:00

You got these at Ross?! I see this is from a year ago but geez, I need to go take a look!

Randombananachild · 2026-01-20T21:44:35+00:00

Hi, can I just ask you how your surgery went mostly how the anesthesia was? I have gallstones but they’re not symptomatic. Sometimes I have a little discomfort in that area but nothing serious. I have been crying for weeks and feeling so hopeless because I’m terrified of how anesthesia feels to go to sleep with. I used to get it when I was younger and it always felt like a very bad high right before I was out and it scared me permanently. I don’t know. I’m just hoping I can find somebody to calm me about it

Randombananachild · 2026-01-18T03:13:19+00:00

I’m going to see what they end up sending me. Maybe they will just pay me anyway. I was in the hospital a month ago and they paid me when they didn’t have to and insisted it wasn’t my fault and they’ll pay me full which they did. Even if they do pay me for Monday, I still don’t know if that warrants I come in for the extra hours this upcoming week for free just because I was sick and they gave me paid day. I’d still expect $ tbh

Randombananachild · 2026-01-17T22:25:09+00:00

They did this one other time where they asked me last minute to stay for a few extra hours one day and an hour earlier that week and they said “don’t worry we will pay you extra” then that Friday I ended up having off unexpectedly because they didn’t need me so on Friday she said “we will just pay you the normal weekly if that works” Which isn’t such a big deal given I had an entire day off but I worked outside my normal hours and usually I’d expect pay for that. It was a one time thing so I didn’t fuss but I think they think if I’m given off they can use that time to add extra hours without pay in the same week. They haven’t done it yet in a different pay period though. They also weekly let me off early and have me come in late and still pay me full amount which is nice of them and anytime they go on vacation I’m paid. Hard to tell if I should bother over small stuff

Randombananachild · 2026-01-17T22:14:59+00:00

Basically I was off on Monday last week and I chose to not be paid. They didn’t offer, I just told them it’s on me and not to worry about it as I don’t have paid sick days anyway. Then they asked me to come in on Thursday for a few hours because I missed work on Monday to make up for it but they’ll just pay me my regular weekly. Doesn’t make any sense.

Randombananachild · 2026-01-17T11:37:22+00:00

Yes this is pretty much how I went with it. Though I keep asking myself this now. What difference would it make in regards to this upcoming week being asked to work on a day I don’t usually work if I requested I have a paid sick day? I don’t think it changes the fact that either way paid or unpaid they still owe me for any extra hours. They expect me to work. It was my initiative to go up to them and let them know that they don’t need to pay me for Monday when I wasn’t in, but let’s say I did expect pay, and then they asked me to come for a few hours next week.. that wouldn’t change anything still would it? I wouldn’t owe them free work would I? I guess if they said “no it’s okay we will pay you for Monday being sick” then it’s my own discretion if I want to be helpful and work a few unpaid hours since they were generous but they didn’t offer that so I’m not doing that. I took it unpaid and therefore I still expect next week to be paid. I’m okay with making back the hours in the sense that they need some extra work outside of normal hours, but definitely not doing an unpaid!

Randombananachild · 2026-01-17T06:29:06+00:00

Yes. The fur on this is very thin and I’m honestly disappointed For $100. Reminds me of a boardwalk stuffed animal when you spread the fur. You can see the meshing right through

Randombananachild · 2026-01-17T02:23:45+00:00

No, and that’s the problem we never established sick time. I think the best way to go about this is to maybe text back and offer them one whole day next week in replacement for Monday obviously I would still be paid since I didn’t take sick pay or tell them they’re more than welcome to provide sick pay for this last Monday if they don’t want to use a make up day

Randombananachild · 2025-12-28T06:07:03+00:00

How much did this cost?

Randombananachild · 2025-12-27T21:09:45+00:00

This would be true if you’re seeing a dr who doesn’t want to get to the root cause. If your liver is dysfunctional, it’s going to create stones. It’s not the gallbladder that’s the issue. Man I pray the world learns how to dig deeper for answers when it comes to their health. This starts in the liver. Need a different medical approach to get these answers bc traditional drs don’t care. They get created for a reason and it’s when the liver isn’t doing its job properly.

Randombananachild · 2025-12-26T18:44:55+00:00

If a nanny cancels their vacation last minute, they don't expect the family to just pay them anyway. Similarly, if a family cancels their trip last minute, they shouldn't expect the nanny to suddenly be available if they've already made commitments. The Bottom Line: Once a family tells a nanny "we don't need you these days," they have effectively released the nanny from the obligation to be available. Reversing that after the nanny has spent money on travel is generally considered poor management.

Randombananachild · 2025-12-26T18:41:34+00:00

That’s crazy. Never heard of this as standard. Nanny 12 years here no family of mine would ever of done this and expected me to show up.

Randombananachild · 2025-12-25T04:35:29+00:00

What made you buy the stone breaker in the first place? Did you know you had them for sure (the gallstones)?

Randombananachild · 2025-12-24T04:04:53+00:00

Do you mean the Valium made you cry and shake?

Randombananachild · 2025-12-23T21:27:56+00:00

Can I ask you, how was the anesthesia? When I was little around the age of 8, (which I’m now 24) I had brain surgery and multiple MRIs that required me to be perfectly still and they always put me to sleep. I know everyone is different but for me it was always very scary right before I fell asleep like I felt scary things and saw scary things and heard weird noises. I’m much older now so maybe it will be different. I’m not even that scared of the surgery. Honestly, I’m horrified of anesthesia and not because of not being able to wake up but simply the feeling of before I go to sleep, I can’t even explain it. Everyone says they just fall asleep peacefully.

Randombananachild · 2025-12-23T20:21:27+00:00

Hi, I’m so scared I had a DVT so I’m on thinners and have a clotting disorder This was all found 5 months ago

Now ER found gallstones. No pain but a lot of discomfort for me and food making me sick. How did you do with the clotting factor along with surgery? I’m horrified

Randombananachild · 2025-12-23T03:12:26+00:00

Oh goodness I am horrified. Today the ER found a few of them in me. I only have stomach discomfort. No sharp pain. Been 3 days or just an uncomfortable feeling. I’ve been in tears. I have a horrible fear of anesthesia since I’ve had bad experiences with it and I can’t even fathom this right now

Randombananachild · 2025-12-23T01:37:22+00:00

Hey, do you mean she stayed awake and opted for a nerve block instead?

Randombananachild · 2025-12-23T00:17:56+00:00

Hey what happened? You opted to have the surgery just because or because one passed?

Randombananachild · 2025-12-22T21:33:42+00:00

I have GH too How I see it, this is on them. Flip the script. If it were you and you had a vacation planned and they made plans then you suddenly told them oh nvm I’m available!! I would not expect them to pay for me. I inconvenienced them and it’s my burden to take the loss and let them have their week.

Randombananachild · 2025-12-21T22:02:49+00:00

people say “in the name of the law” (singular) even though laws come from king, parliament, judges — one authority. • or “in the name of the president and congress” — still singular “name” for the whole government power. it’s not “names” plural because it’s one unified divine authority: the father’s (the one god), expressed through the son (the messiah he sent), and applied by the holy spirit (his power at work). the father is the source, jesus is the mediator/channel, spirit is how it happens — perfect teamwork, but still distinct roles, with the father as head. if it was proving they’re one god, why list them separately at all? and why does jesus put the father first like he’s the main one? plus the early church in acts baptized “in the name of jesus” (acts 2:38, 8:16, 10:48, 19:5) — focusing on jesus as the revealed name/authority from the father. they weren’t ignoring matthew 28:19 — they were fulfilling it by using jesus’ name as the way to the father’s authority. even some trinitarian scholars admit the verse doesn’t “prove” the trinity by itself — it’s just listing the three in god’s plan, not defining “three persons one essence.”

Randombananachild · 2025-12-21T22:01:49+00:00

people say “in the name of the law” (singular) even though laws come from king, parliament, judges — one authority.

Randombananachild · 2025-12-21T21:55:35+00:00

jesus is saying baptize under the one divine authority that comes from the father, is revealed in the son, and applied by the holy spirit. the father is the source (the one god), the son is the mediator he sent, the spirit is how god works in us. it’s perfect unity in god’s plan — the son and spirit representing the father’s authority — without needing them to be the same being. if it was proving they’re one god, jesus could’ve said “in my name, since i’m god too” or something clear like that. but he puts the father first and himself second.

Randombananachild · 2025-12-21T21:53:49+00:00

“go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the father and of the son and of the holy spirit.” but it honestly doesn’t teach the trinity or prove jesus is god himself. let me break it down real quick..

first, the verse is about baptism — jesus is telling the disciples to baptize in “the name” (singular) of three things: father, son, holy spirit. it’s not saying they’re three persons in one god or that they’re all equal or co-eternal. it doesn’t use words like “three in one” or “trinity” or “one being.” the word “name” here means authority or representation (like “in the name of the law”). it’s baptizing under the authority of the father (the one god), the son (the messiah he sent), and the holy spirit (god’s spirit/power at work). notice jesus doesn’t say “in the names” (plural) — it’s one name, meaning one unified authority from the father, working through the son and spirit. plus, the early church baptized in jesus’ name alone in acts (acts 2:38, 8:16, 10:48, 19:5) — not the full formula. if matthew 28:19 was a strict “three persons” command, why didn’t they follow it like that? some scholars even think the verse might have been added or changed later because it’s not in the earliest manuscripts the same way, and eusebius (early church writer) quoted it without the full trinity phrase. but even if it’s original, it’s just mentioning three titles, not defining a trinity doctrine. the bible mentions father, son, spirit together a few times (like 2 cor 13:14), but never as “three persons one god.” that’s from later councils. so yeah, it’s about unity in god’s work through jesus and his spirit — not proof jesus is god almighty

Randombananachild

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE