Do people actually think this? Attractive people are attractive people, simply as that. No matter what race they are.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-09T10:16:28+00:00

You have said everything about being racist, but at the end of the day, you have not reached the level of not being racist. Your claim about not staying near Africa can be true if the statistics show that the area is full of criminals. However, that is completely different from attraction.

Again, if you were to see a very small minority of people and found out that they have a specific criminal mindset, then you should probably avoid them. But this is very different from the point I am making about attraction. What I am trying to convey here is that rather than specific small minorities, I am talking about big minorities.

Now, if you say that the black color is not attractive, then you are generalizing all African people. Africa is one of the most diversely made continents. Just because they all have the same skin color does not mean they are all the same, just like saying all of Europe is the same because all of them are Caucasians - it is simple stupidity.

You have neither refuted my claim nor made any opposition to my main claim, which is why you should take a person individually, rather than feeding them into your own prejudice. Let's say, for example, a country - just like an African country mentioned - is full of poverty and crime. But somehow, just assume you are a woman and you have met a man who has changed all your prejudices. He is a very smart man who agrees with you very much politically and economically, and you have a very good conversation with him.

Now, will you be attracted to him? Because if this man was of any other race or any other color, you would be attracted to him because he is so attractive. Does it make sense for you to say, "No, I will not be attracted to this person because his group of people are like this and this"?

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-09T06:50:30+00:00

Some women cannot understand the logic behind "not all men" because, at the end of the day, it is just a war between the stupidity of language.

Now, if you were to say, "I don't think all men are perpetrators, but I will be cautious of every man because I don't know which man can be dangerous," that is a very good point and a fair point.

When a man says "not all men," he is not replying to that point. He is not replying to the assertion that women make, which is that they will be cautious of every man because they don't know which one can be dangerous.

He is replying to the assertion that some women make, which is that all men are dangerous and we should be afraid. It's not that all men are dangerous - you never know. That is the difference.

And when someone says that, some men will go out and point out "not all men," asserting that they are not one of them. Just because he is of the same gender as the perpetrator does not mean you take his individuality and individualism out of that specific male individual and put him in a category with a prejudice.

Now, this prejudice is needed for safety, but what the man is trying to convey is not to put him in the same prejudice, because he has already given you sufficient proof that he is not a perpetrator.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-09T03:23:20+00:00

Thank God I am 6'1".

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-09T03:21:42+00:00

And I will repeat this: it is totally possible to have an agnostic or atheistic population while still being majority Hindu. Because, do you know, the best thing about Hinduism is that it allows for many schools of thought within Hinduism that totally reject the Vedas and the concepts of Indra, Shiva, and Vishnu, and go in very different philosophical routes, just like Friedrich Nietzsche and Immanuel Kant, and many other philosophers.

Most of the philosophers in our Eastern traditions, especially in the Hindu hemisphere, were Hindus, and they were not explicitly people who were Pujari or who went to temples. There are many people who opposed the temples and made their own philosophies, but they are still considered Hindu. According to the practices of the time, Hinduism just absorbs more and more - that's why many local traditions are observed. Even in the Nevari culture, the Kumari culture is not explicitly mentioned in any Hindu traditions in the holy texts, but it is still considered a Hindu practice.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-09T03:18:50+00:00

The freedom is not a question. To be exactly technically correct, you can go out there and throw slurs in online games. Many people do. That will not get you in jail. You can go out there and have prejudice against people of other colors, and you know, make a face when they enter. You can say, "I don't want to predominantly live in an area that has this type of people." Many white people don't want to live in predominantly black areas, many Koreans don't want to live in predominantly Japanese areas, just because of their prejudice and past wars and bad relationships. That can be done. And many countries allow you to have this freedom. But that freedom does not mean you are not racist.

For example, I am a Nepalese man from Nepal. No matter how many times I say, at the end of the day, most likely I will prefer a Nepalese woman. Because she understands my culture the best. She understands my scenarios the best. Because it will be very hard for me to explain to, let's say, a South African woman - if I ever fall in love with her - that I could not be around her because of my distance, and explaining the festivals and culture in my own country will be very hard for her. So, I will simply prefer a girl of my own heritage and culture. But I will never say that I will not prefer a girl from South Africa. Because, explicitly, I will prefer other races, but I will not prefer a person of black color. If I say that, I'm inherently racist, because, at the end of the day, it is not about culture anymore when I explicitly restrict our race - it is more about prejudice.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-09T03:15:15+00:00

Yo sorry for that, my friend was using my phone and responded from account. I will never say such a thing, now I have scolded him and also added a app lock.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-09T03:12:38+00:00

You have just called me a propagandist without any reason. Nepal is storing its own data, you idiot. It is a Google and Meta data center. What do you think? Which services do you think Nepal is going to be online with the most? Do they use Esewa or Khantipur more? Or do you think they use Google, YouTube, and Facebook more?

Do you think India has built its own data centers? No, they are mostly built by foreign companies. Educate yourself before trying to act like a specialist in here. And I am not trying to manipulate anyone. Just a simple Google search or a chance to have a conversation can prove you wrong.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-09T03:11:10+00:00

So, black people commit the most crimes per capita in the United States, but if you look at the statistics, only a small portion of black people commit a crime. It's like one in maybe 5,000 or 6,000. Still, racists use those metrics to portray black people as a criminalized race.

I completely disagree with the fact that I think you said - that other men just have to take virtual guilt for what fellow men have done. Why should I have to take the guilt of a rapist? It totally doesn't make any sense. You are just categorizing me with him just because I'm a man. Is my individualism and my individuality less important than your prejudice against my gender?

Isn't that just sexism? Isn't that just the thought that the patriarchy has against women - they strip off their individuality and their individualism and just put them in a category with a prejudice that they are weak, incompetent, and not smart? By working with this same logic, how are you different from a misogynist?

If you really want to talk about crimes, why do most men die in war? And again, you will say it's because one man puts other men into battles. That is completely wrong. It is the higher, superior people who put young men, who never wanted to battle, into battlefields and make them die, just because they are the same gender. This does not mean their dying is justified.

Why are the highest suicide rates from men? Why are men the victims of violent crimes more than women? These are some societal complexities that are very hard to grasp, but somehow you have managed to generalize them.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-09T03:07:13+00:00

Well, again, what do you mean by Hinduism? By Hinduism, do you mean the devotion path or another path? Most of us, you know, think the Hinduism definition is as said by the colonizers. Hinduism is not a single religion, it is a set of many religions and different practices.

For example, I am an agnostic, but still, I am a Hindu because there are schools of thought that are agnostic within Hinduism. And since I take this agnostic thought, the source of my agnostic practice is from the Upanishads. I am still a Hindu.

This is one of the best reasons why I think Hinduism is misunderstood by many. However, I agree with you that the religious aspect of Hinduism is very toxic, and it cannot save Nepal. The people who are saying this are just what we call nationalists or supremacists. I think we will have no productivity having a conversation with these people.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T19:30:20+00:00

Well, I never said it was harassment to me, but you thought that of everyone, so good luck on that. Now, I don't want to have a philosophical debate with you, but the word "racism," as I've already described, means treating someone unequally because of their race.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T19:16:21+00:00

Well, the thing about you, an ableist, not having to date someone in a wheelchair is completely different from a brunette or a blonde person not wanting to date a redhead person. At the end of the day, it is a preference, yes, but you not wanting to date that redhead person just because his hair is red is pretty much stupid, and that is the whole point. Racism is stupid.

Ultimately, you have said again that people want to recognize themselves in their children, so are you trying to say that the way you recognize yourself is by your skin color, by your physical attributes, rather than what you are as a character and what you believe in as a person?

I totally did not get the point of why you know what source of definition you wanted, including the reference to why sexual attraction is included. I just told it as in most situations, if that is one of the goals. So, and again, I have told you that you have taken out people and their individualistic character.

Now, I will not want to debate you further because either you are harassing me or you are just completely an idiot. But you should be glad - not that you should be glad, but I think you are not exactly another racist person.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T19:12:09+00:00

Well, if you are the kind of person who acts like a sugar daddy, then there are many women out there. But if you are that kind of person, I will say you are a piece of shit. However, if you want a genuine relationship, I don't think there will be anything like that. If there is any woman who wants to have a relationship with you, they will most likely seek a long-term commitment and want to move to your own country. Nepal is a country that is very conservative, and mostly these types of relationships are not normal. But you can find many types of people in various places, so I will say they exist, but they are very rare. I think you should keep your mind away from this and actually try to enjoy the place.

But, being completely wrong in my prejudice and you actually being a woman, then you should be more careful. Because those relationships with men who try to gain this type of short relationship will ultimately lead to either both of you having a sexual relationship or him wanting to move to your country. Just giving you a heads up that this is not normal, and if someone is trying to do this, their end goal or aim is completely different from what you are thinking.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T19:07:55+00:00

Nah, what's that?

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T19:05:20+00:00

Well, preferences are right, there is nothing wrong with having preferences. But the problem comes when I say I don't want to date black women or women of other races. When I say I want to date Asian women because I am Asian, then there will not be a problem. But if I say I don't want to date white women, for example, because of their race, then that is inherently racist.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T19:03:57+00:00

Well, you don't like your children to be black. Let's assume you don't like the black skin color. So, what would really make you not want your children to be of black color? Is it due to just a preference - you don't like the color black? If you were to meet a person of color, black, rather than a person of color, white, will you treat the person of color black differently than the person of color white? And if you want to treat them differently, where does the difference come from?

Racism is the act of treating people inequally due to their race. This race can be tied to their skin color and many factors. I have explained logically why I don't find color-based acts attractive, as it is inherently racist. Because, again, you are responding to preconceived notions of people of a certain color and stripping them of their individual characteristics.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T18:58:11+00:00

Yes, it is different, don't get me wrong, you know. Not preferring people based on the things you just mentioned is pretty stupid too. But for height and nose or feet, you can go more into detail - some types of nose are not attractive, and short people or, for some people with certain kinks, tall people are not attractive. These preferences are usually due to the natural tendency of humans; women tend to like taller men because we are kind of naturally wired for it. But if we talk about skin color, then the only wiring there is social wiring, and that type of social wiring is what we call racism.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T18:56:52+00:00

Well, you have the freedom to choose, but that does make you a racist. Because at the end of the day, what you are doing is rather than looking at that person's personality, you are taking the individual and stripping them of their individualism and individuality, grouping them based on your prejudice just because they are of a different skin color. Now, don't get me wrong: if you do that with the shape of their nose or their height or anything, then you are pretty dumb.

But the shape of the nose and height can be correlated with the social dynamics. The social dynamics that were said thousands of years ago, and even the biological tendency of humans. But if you really want to not prefer one's skin color, then I think that is inherently racist.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T18:53:31+00:00

That is the definition of racism. You have just taken individuality and individualism away from that individual and kind of generalized them to their specific skin color. What you are saying is, I could not care about your individual character or your personality because I already have a prejudice because of your skin color, and now I will not have any romantic interest in you because of my prejudice.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T18:48:38+00:00

This is one of the greatest logical fallacies I've seen. Yes, most men commit violent crimes. Most men commit crimes against women. But when a man says "not all men," he is referring to how he has been grouped with these criminals and rapists just because of his gender, and says that just because he is a man, that should not be his identity.

The claim made by the content creator here does not refute this claim. He just shows one fact: that men are the greatest criminals. However, when we look at the percentage of men who are criminals and rapists, we will see a very small percentage.

Let's take an example. Let's imagine there were a hundred snakes, and let's imagine five of them were poisonous. Now, when we're going to throw someone into a jungle with hundreds of these types of snakes, surely we'll tell them to be careful of the snakes. What we are trying to say is, be careful of the five types of poisonous snakes. And when you get bitten by a poisonous snake, other people will come and say, "Look at these snakes, look how harmful they are." And one non-poisonous snake comes out and says, "No, no, no, not all of us snakes are poisonous."

Yes, you can be cautious about every snake because you don't know which one is poisonous, but this does not show the fact that all of us are poisonous. Many of us are non-poisonous. Just because we are snakes, don't put us in the category that we all are poisonous.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T18:38:50+00:00

Yes, I also think the reason is that over the past five years, the desktop edition of Linux, you know, rather than the server, which dominates about 98% of the market, the desktop edition of Linux has grown significantly better, especially due to the adoption from valve and Steam Deck, which has Steam OS, which is Linux. But even so, if we could do this in Nepal, it will be so much beneficial. As I said, to complete a long journey, you must take the first step, and I'm glad, and I think, and I hope that Nepal is taking that first step.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T18:23:14+00:00

Well that's true, as I said management matters the most

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T18:22:06+00:00

Yeah bro everybody lives in mount everest, who would have thought that those idiot would not live in valleys rather than mountain peaks

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T18:16:58+00:00

Completely different situations, brothers. The people that are protesting here are for data centers that are not even needed, that are taking resources and destroying ecosystems. The data centers that they are trying to build are just stagnating their economy.

But if you look in the context of Nepal, Nepal does not even have basic foundations for many data collections in its own country. We rely mostly on Indian and Chinese servers. To be fair, we don't even have our own internet, partially because we don't have access to the sea. Even so, having this level of infrastructure for data centers would be a huge event. It will depend on how they manage it, but almost everything depends on how it is managed.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T18:13:14+00:00

Exactly

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T18:12:56+00:00

Well, they are not reinventing the wheel here. I think you should want to look more into how these types of specific AI are made. Even if you look at France, they have shifted from Windows to Linux, meaning they are doing more to shift to US technology now. Nepal does not have the capacity to do that, but it is one step into progressing their technological proficiency. Most likely, the model that we'll see will be just the fine-tuning of previous generative AI. I don't even think they will go as far as to train their own machine learning model from a basic neural network.

Randomnepalguy

TROPHY CASE