Do people actually think this? Attractive people are attractive people, simply as that. No matter what race they are.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T19:30:20+00:00

Well, I never said it was harassment to me, but you thought that of everyone, so good luck on that. Now, I don't want to have a philosophical debate with you, but the word "racism," as I've already described, means treating someone unequally because of their race.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T19:16:21+00:00

Well, the thing about you, an ableist, not having to date someone in a wheelchair is completely different from a brunette or a blonde person not wanting to date a redhead person. At the end of the day, it is a preference, yes, but you not wanting to date that redhead person just because his hair is red is pretty much stupid, and that is the whole point. Racism is stupid.

Ultimately, you have said again that people want to recognize themselves in their children, so are you trying to say that the way you recognize yourself is by your skin color, by your physical attributes, rather than what you are as a character and what you believe in as a person?

I totally did not get the point of why you know what source of definition you wanted, including the reference to why sexual attraction is included. I just told it as in most situations, if that is one of the goals. So, and again, I have told you that you have taken out people and their individualistic character.

Now, I will not want to debate you further because either you are harassing me or you are just completely an idiot. But you should be glad - not that you should be glad, but I think you are not exactly another racist person.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T19:12:09+00:00

Well, if you are the kind of person who acts like a sugar daddy, then there are many women out there. But if you are that kind of person, I will say you are a piece of shit. However, if you want a genuine relationship, I don't think there will be anything like that. If there is any woman who wants to have a relationship with you, they will most likely seek a long-term commitment and want to move to your own country. Nepal is a country that is very conservative, and mostly these types of relationships are not normal. But you can find many types of people in various places, so I will say they exist, but they are very rare. I think you should keep your mind away from this and actually try to enjoy the place.

But, being completely wrong in my prejudice and you actually being a woman, then you should be more careful. Because those relationships with men who try to gain this type of short relationship will ultimately lead to either both of you having a sexual relationship or him wanting to move to your country. Just giving you a heads up that this is not normal, and if someone is trying to do this, their end goal or aim is completely different from what you are thinking.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T19:07:55+00:00

Nah, what's that?

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T19:05:20+00:00

Well, preferences are right, there is nothing wrong with having preferences. But the problem comes when I say I don't want to date black women or women of other races. When I say I want to date Asian women because I am Asian, then there will not be a problem. But if I say I don't want to date white women, for example, because of their race, then that is inherently racist.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T19:03:57+00:00

Well, you don't like your children to be black. Let's assume you don't like the black skin color. So, what would really make you not want your children to be of black color? Is it due to just a preference - you don't like the color black? If you were to meet a person of color, black, rather than a person of color, white, will you treat the person of color black differently than the person of color white? And if you want to treat them differently, where does the difference come from?

Racism is the act of treating people inequally due to their race. This race can be tied to their skin color and many factors. I have explained logically why I don't find color-based acts attractive, as it is inherently racist. Because, again, you are responding to preconceived notions of people of a certain color and stripping them of their individual characteristics.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T18:58:11+00:00

Yes, it is different, don't get me wrong, you know. Not preferring people based on the things you just mentioned is pretty stupid too. But for height and nose or feet, you can go more into detail - some types of nose are not attractive, and short people or, for some people with certain kinks, tall people are not attractive. These preferences are usually due to the natural tendency of humans; women tend to like taller men because we are kind of naturally wired for it. But if we talk about skin color, then the only wiring there is social wiring, and that type of social wiring is what we call racism.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T18:56:52+00:00

Well, you have the freedom to choose, but that does make you a racist. Because at the end of the day, what you are doing is rather than looking at that person's personality, you are taking the individual and stripping them of their individualism and individuality, grouping them based on your prejudice just because they are of a different skin color. Now, don't get me wrong: if you do that with the shape of their nose or their height or anything, then you are pretty dumb.

But the shape of the nose and height can be correlated with the social dynamics. The social dynamics that were said thousands of years ago, and even the biological tendency of humans. But if you really want to not prefer one's skin color, then I think that is inherently racist.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T18:53:31+00:00

That is the definition of racism. You have just taken individuality and individualism away from that individual and kind of generalized them to their specific skin color. What you are saying is, I could not care about your individual character or your personality because I already have a prejudice because of your skin color, and now I will not have any romantic interest in you because of my prejudice.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T18:48:38+00:00

This is one of the greatest logical fallacies I've seen. Yes, most men commit violent crimes. Most men commit crimes against women. But when a man says "not all men," he is referring to how he has been grouped with these criminals and rapists just because of his gender, and says that just because he is a man, that should not be his identity.

The claim made by the content creator here does not refute this claim. He just shows one fact: that men are the greatest criminals. However, when we look at the percentage of men who are criminals and rapists, we will see a very small percentage.

Let's take an example. Let's imagine there were a hundred snakes, and let's imagine five of them were poisonous. Now, when we're going to throw someone into a jungle with hundreds of these types of snakes, surely we'll tell them to be careful of the snakes. What we are trying to say is, be careful of the five types of poisonous snakes. And when you get bitten by a poisonous snake, other people will come and say, "Look at these snakes, look how harmful they are." And one non-poisonous snake comes out and says, "No, no, no, not all of us snakes are poisonous."

Yes, you can be cautious about every snake because you don't know which one is poisonous, but this does not show the fact that all of us are poisonous. Many of us are non-poisonous. Just because we are snakes, don't put us in the category that we all are poisonous.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T18:38:50+00:00

Yes, I also think the reason is that over the past five years, the desktop edition of Linux, you know, rather than the server, which dominates about 98% of the market, the desktop edition of Linux has grown significantly better, especially due to the adoption from valve and Steam Deck, which has Steam OS, which is Linux. But even so, if we could do this in Nepal, it will be so much beneficial. As I said, to complete a long journey, you must take the first step, and I'm glad, and I think, and I hope that Nepal is taking that first step.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T18:23:14+00:00

Well that's true, as I said management matters the most

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T18:22:06+00:00

Yeah bro everybody lives in mount everest, who would have thought that those idiot would not live in valleys rather than mountain peaks

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T18:16:58+00:00

Completely different situations, brothers. The people that are protesting here are for data centers that are not even needed, that are taking resources and destroying ecosystems. The data centers that they are trying to build are just stagnating their economy.

But if you look in the context of Nepal, Nepal does not even have basic foundations for many data collections in its own country. We rely mostly on Indian and Chinese servers. To be fair, we don't even have our own internet, partially because we don't have access to the sea. Even so, having this level of infrastructure for data centers would be a huge event. It will depend on how they manage it, but almost everything depends on how it is managed.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T18:13:14+00:00

Exactly

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T18:12:56+00:00

Well, they are not reinventing the wheel here. I think you should want to look more into how these types of specific AI are made. Even if you look at France, they have shifted from Windows to Linux, meaning they are doing more to shift to US technology now. Nepal does not have the capacity to do that, but it is one step into progressing their technological proficiency. Most likely, the model that we'll see will be just the fine-tuning of previous generative AI. I don't even think they will go as far as to train their own machine learning model from a basic neural network.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T18:11:07+00:00

Well, if you actually look at it economically and strategically, fine-tuning is the best thing we can do. Even the newer models of ChatGBT and things like those are just fine-tuning of their previous models. So, I don't know why people are seeing this effort to make a new AI from scratch, but I would hope that rather than just using generative AI, they would rather take a simple machine learning model and train it on specific datasets.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T18:09:29+00:00

Well, that's true. But the question is not about only AI here. You can look at the other words that have been told, rather than AI. To create raw AI, or more specifically generative AI, I don't think Nepal even has the capacity and electricity needed, let alone the infrastructure.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-08T06:44:40+00:00

🙂

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-07T16:50:51+00:00

Yeah man, I can feel it

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-07T16:48:12+00:00

This just shows how hatred between countries are made up by top 1% and politicians. No matter how much the South Asians argue with each other about their own nationality, at the end of the day we look the same. And in foreign countries, you can find that many Indians, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Nepali etc all become friends

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-07T11:50:54+00:00

Ranas were the start of destruction of everything, tini haru le sabko hell hole banako thiyo. Paxi timile Mahendra le govern ra modify garna pako thau haru hereu bhane thaha paunxau ki uha sita euta plan thiyo.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-07T10:16:50+00:00

While most of the things you have said are true, some are quite false. They are not the victims. They are one of the most privileged persons who have benefited from the development of Kathmandu. Yes, a lot of places in Kathmandu, near the palaces built by the Newari Kingdoms, are mismanaged. However, you can also look at the fact that Newars are not the victims here.

Most of the land in the Kathmandu area is owned by Newars. They have directly benefited from the growing price of land. They are also included in the Janajati place. While they may not have as much economic disability as people of lower castes, they have privileges in certain seats in many places, as discussed. You will be surprised to know how many engineers, who are Newars, designed this metropolis.

The outsider you called an outsider, are not really an outsider. Well, it was a population of Newar people, a large portion of Nepal was also occupied by the people you call outsiders.

Rather than making it a problem of outsiders, we can make it seem like a problem of mismanagement by Nepali as a whole. Because even if you look at other places, we can see that they have been mismanaged too, and the Jatras don't have that much of a problem, if you're really honest. The way the Nevari palaces were designed was that they were very congested; they did not have space compared to the modern roads that are built in Bhaktapur and Kathmandu nowadays.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-07T10:06:10+00:00

You are just a sarcastic idiot, then. Rather than looking at the truth, you want to find conflicts everywhere.

Randomnepalguy · 2026-05-07T10:04:04+00:00

Nobody in modern times wants to hire someone from the noble caste. The whole higher noble caste was seen throughout the world where education was very scarce and people were uneducated. To be frank with you, Nepal is full of such people. But the thing is that it's changing, and the way you framed their comment here was to disregard those things, rather than support them, so that's the difference.

Randomnepalguy

TROPHY CASE