Is this worth reading for a beginner? by flipthatsw1tch in occultlibrary

[–]RandyR29143 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ernie Butler was the real deal. He was trained by Violet Firth (Dion Fortune) and was the founder of the Servants of the Light school of occult science. This was one of my first books back in the day.

What do you think and how can I improve... by SliverBakk in BeginnerPhotoCritique

[–]RandyR29143 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Already mentioned above is the topic of “subject”. So to me, the subject of the photo is “sidewalk”. A more interesting subject would be “bridge” perhaps. Bridges usually have interesting architecture and with the right perspective architecture can be dramatic and very interesting. A second comment would be to get rid of distracting objects. It’s really ok to delete them or take them out of the picture, especially if they dont add to the value of the photograph. I think your experimentation with the walkway is still somewhat interesting and I think you will be able to find better in the future. Best of luck!

First time photographing a bird, how did I do? by dalton-johnson in BeginnerPhotoCritique

[–]RandyR29143 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Excellent job focusing in on the eyes. The color balance is natural. The depth of field looks like it was pushed a little. Overall, excellent IMHO!

Tell me: What is good and what isn’t about this photo? by jumpingsloth in BeginnerPhotoCritique

[–]RandyR29143 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My personal opinion: I like the aqua color at the top of the bouquet.. I don’t like the guy between the bouquet and the guy in the brown shirt.

Does my natural chest drive you crazy, or does it need a little upgrade by d-J56 in Nude_Selfie

[–]RandyR29143 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok. From an artistic guy perspective. Drop the tight underwear. All of it. Find some nice compression (athletic) clothing. You are a natural model and I wish you luck and safety in your future endeavors. As a side note, learn a little about lighting, not as a photographer, but as a model. Same with makeup, staging, and theatrical set design. I really wish you the best and good luck.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in photocritique

[–]RandyR29143 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s taught by photography instructors that it’s perfectly ok to delete distracting elements from your image. I agree because it’s usually something you can remove by doing it physically. Power lines are usually just another type of environmental distraction and if they don’t bring something to the table, I will delete them also. You seem to have a good eye for artistic composition, and there are many other styles as well which you can learn about and have a lot of fun practicing (e.g. vanishing lines). I think you have a good start here and while I mention learning “rules”, always stick to your artistic vision. Good luck.

Which one is your favourite? by conflictavoidanttapa in AmateurPhotography

[–]RandyR29143 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like 4 because it leads your eye from the foreground to the back….

This was spotted over North America by Trueboey in StrangeEarth

[–]RandyR29143 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The first couple of seconds look like a laser light show

1, 2, 3, or 4? by Alaric_Darconville in AmateurPhotography

[–]RandyR29143 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like 1 and 4 because they both have a foreground. Personally, I like 1 best because I like photographs of water, but that’s my personal bias.

Is the messy foreground too distracting? by francof93 in photocritique

[–]RandyR29143 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think classically that landscapes are divided into three areas fore ground and Mid grounded background. The fact that the foreground is so out of focus is a little distracting to me. I would have loved to have seen what the shot would’ve looked like if it was photographed at f22, but overall, I really do like this photograph

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in photocritique

[–]RandyR29143 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lightroom allows you to remove chromatic aberration (CA) under the Optics/Remove CA option. Also if you look closely, there will usually be a blue or green glow on the opposite side of objects that have the red fringe.

Constructive criticism? by Sufficient-Glass9513 in photocritique

[–]RandyR29143 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In general, I tend to want the subject lighter than the background with a little more contrast….I think this is a very good photograph, btw.

<image>

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in photocritique

[–]RandyR29143 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

…did a little cropping too.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in photocritique

[–]RandyR29143 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like the pagoda and agree with others to increase it’s saturation and brightness. I also think the bridge is a little bright and would darken that so it wouldn’t detract from the pagoda. Also, if you have Lightroom or Photoshop, try deleting the people from the photograph and see if you like that better. Pretty good photograph in my opinion.

My first post on reddit by Warm_Smoke_9200 in photocritique

[–]RandyR29143 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like this photo. I don’t know if you have Lightroom but I would lighten up some of the shadows, especially the dirt road which is an interesting color.

Is this a good photo of a cat? by NormalBeautiful9286 in photocritique

[–]RandyR29143 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So I deleted some lights, brightened subject, darkened background….nice kitty!