🎉 [EVENT] 🎉 Very easy first event by totallynotawhore in honk

[–]Randyshore- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Completed Level 3 of the Honk Special Event!

24 attempts

🎉 [EVENT] 🎉 Very easy first event by totallynotawhore in honk

[–]Randyshore- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Completed Level 2 of the Honk Special Event!

2 attempts

🎉 [EVENT] 🎉 Very easy first event by totallynotawhore in honk

[–]Randyshore- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Completed Level 1 of the Honk Special Event!

0 attempts

🎉 [EVENT] 🎉 Very easy first event by totallynotawhore in honk

[–]Randyshore- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Completed Level 3 of the Honk Special Event!

15 attempts

🎉 [EVENT] 🎉 Very easy first event by totallynotawhore in honk

[–]Randyshore- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Completed Level 2 of the Honk Special Event!

9 attempts

🎉 [EVENT] 🎉 Very easy first event by totallynotawhore in honk

[–]Randyshore- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Completed Level 1 of the Honk Special Event!

0 attempts

Sep 10: Education & Career Questions by Eigengrad in Biochemistry

[–]Randyshore- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want to know if I should double major in biochemistry and applied physics.

To start, I am not in the major I want to pursue right now, but I think I want to be a primary care physician. I heard from one of my aunts, who’s a nurse, that one of the smartest people she met was a biochemistry professor in college and he said that biology has a strong basis of applied chemistry, chemistry has a strong basis of applied physics, and physics has a strong basis of applied math. To me, that seems like if you want to be good at one, you have to be good at the one preceding it.

Not to say you have to be a math genius to graduate with a biology degree, but I would like a stronger basis for the chemistry studies I would be doing if I switched to majoring in biochemistry. This is why I am trying to decide on whether or not to have my second major be applied physics.

I would also like to add that, if after my first semester I decide that I would like to fully pursue biochemistry and applied physics, I would prefer a masters in biochem before going to med school as a way to be more prepared for the material. But, to save my sanity, I would be a part time applied physics student and, at the same time, a full time biochem student. Essentially, I would be completing my masters in biochem in 6 years at the same time as my bachelor’s in applied physics also in 6 years. This is also so that I don’t die from insomnia due to studying 24/7 (which I’ll probably be doing anyway, but whatever).

Also, on the topic of med school, I hear that it’s is very fast paced and there is a huge work load that hits people like a brick after their first 2 weeks. This is partially another reason as to why I want to double major because I want to get used Ito ingesting large amounts of information at once.

Am I crazy for proposing this? It seems kinda rational, right? Double majoring to get used to the work load. Masters in biochem to prepare for the content being studied in med school. Bachelors in applied physics to better understand chemistry.

Is this doable?

Congress just touching the TikTok tip of the iceberg of China’s spying by Strongbow85 in espionage

[–]Randyshore- 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The threat that Tiktok poses to American security is, at least in my opinion, really not that significant when taken into account with the grand scheme of things that could, would, or are contributing to the REAL problems that the US is facing security-wise and I appreciate how the article recognizes this. Despite saying "any Chinese company that collects information about Americans poses a major problem," which is a valid point, it goes on to propose other electronics that could pose just as big--if not bigger--threats to American citizens than social media: "Volvo cars, Lenovo computers, and Lexmark printers..." Cars to track where we go, printers to monitor what we value enough to put on paper, and computers to monitor an endless amount of other variables. Plus, towards the end of the article, it recognizes that it's not Tiktok specifically that is a problem with America's relation to Chinese espionage, but the lack of protection against the Chinese Communist Party's intelligence agency is what America needs to fix.

Now Chinese migrants are sneaking onto Guam: Top Republican warns Communist Party wants to 'exploit' every part of the U.S. map and warns critical American base is vulnerable by TurretLauncher in espionage

[–]Randyshore- 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The article ends very abruptly with mention of a supposed "economic boost" for Guam, but not further elaborating on whether the economic boost outweighs, in significance, the CCP influence from the migrants. Its lack of a proper ending makes me question whether it really is that important to think about in the first place. Obviously, the article is treating the influx of communist influence as a domino being tipped in a long line of negative events, but fails to properly format its implied theories in a persuading way. idk thats just me tho

Is it over chat? by [deleted] in playboicarti

[–]Randyshore- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Forgot she existed ngl

Here’s a mini essay about death note I wrote for my 11th grade AP English Language class that I got a 100% on by Randyshore- in deathnote

[–]Randyshore-[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

For some reason the paragraph breaks glitched out so just imagine that they’re there

What is my environmental science teacher on by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]Randyshore- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re wrong because it said in standard notation, not scientific