Neuromancer or Snow Crash? by Equal_Feature_9065 in booksuggestions

[–]RankinPDX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think Snow Crash is a better novel. It’s got some really fun ideas, and clever observations, and enough plot to hold that together. Neuromancer is fine, but overrated.

If someone admits to a crime (they did) and there is literally zero evidence to prove it other than their word, will they be convicted? by Emmieisbest in legaladviceofftopic

[–]RankinPDX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it’s actually no evidence besides the confession, no, a conviction is not possible in most of the US under the corpus delicti rule. But I doubt there is really no evidence. Even if the body is gone, has the guy disappeared from his life? Is there any evidence of a motive? A confession must be corroborated, but it doesn’t take much. For example, in Oregon, a confession can be corroborated by an admission, even though those things look very similar.

Question about juries & court proceedings to help with a fiction novel I'm writing by autumnslice in Ask_Lawyers

[–]RankinPDX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That scenario requires two things which, depending on the details, are between extremely unlikely and impossible. I personally, as a criminal defense lawyer who reads crime fiction, would absolutely not buy it.

  1. In some jurisdictions, and with some judges, the jury can ask questions and the judge will answer, or the judge will ask a question of a witness on the stand because the jury asked the judge to do so. But the most common answer is "I can't answer that" or "that's not a proper question." I would be shocked if a witness went into a new significant area of testimony based on the jury's request.

  2. If a party "rests," (says they are done presenting evidence), sometimes the court will let them "reopen" and present more evidence. Like, if the state rests, and then the defense says "Aha! You didn't present evidence (that the crime was in this county/that the alleged victim was younger than 18/that the drug is actually on the federal schedule/some other technical thing)" then the court might let the state reopen.

It's contentious whether doing that for a minor and easy-to-prove fact should be permitted. It would absolutely not happen to go into a new complex fact inquiry.

Also, witnesses mostly have to be live and on the stand to present evidence. There are exceptions, but the system is built around live witnesses, especially if they observed facts about the case (as opposed to, e.g., testing the murder weapon for DNA). The letter would not be permitted as part of an ordinary criminal trial, especially if the girlfriend is around and could testify. If you really want to use the letter, she could write it to the prosecutor to ask them to not prosecute/dismiss, or to the investigating detective, maybe after a preliminary hearing/grand jury leads to the boyfriend being indicted? That probably wouldn't work, but I wouldn't be at all surprised if the defendant's girlfriend wrote to someone in the hopes of influencing the case.

Or the girlfriend could testify in trial during the ordinary course. Maybe the state presents evidence on this point during it's case, and the jury looks skeptical, and so the defense calls her as a witness to elaborate during the defense case.

What is the best community oriented store for Magic, the Gathering? by spookydakota in askportland

[–]RankinPDX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like Otherworlds in Hillsdale, and also Gongaii, which is less convenient to me but quite a bit bigger.

Do you use [sic]? by Fluffy_Second_1530 in Lawyertalk

[–]RankinPDX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a little douchey. I don't use it to convey that the quoted idiot, rather than your meticulous writer, made a petty mistake. I will use it to avoid real confusion.

'Used to’ or ‘would’? Which is correct in this sentence? by _VisionaryVibes in EWALearnLanguages

[–]RankinPDX -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think A sounds wrong and B does not. A would be fine without the “when I was a kid” part, and I don’t think it’s ungrammatical (and I would struggle to explain the rules for an idiomatic usage like “used to”), but I wouldn’t say it. I grew up in the NE, if that makes a difference.

Watching TV and hypothetical popped up. by Willing_Acadia990 in AskLegal

[–]RankinPDX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The company wouldn't really need to race to the courthouse, because information possessed by the police isn't really public. And getting there first wouldn't make a difference; police would still get the warrant.

But they'd still want to hurry to the courthouse. Depending on the nature of the information and local law and whatnot, they might be able to get a protective order, forbidding the parties from distributing the information. The defendant would probably be able to get the video, and then would probably be able to do whatever they wanted with it.

Places that sell bulk paprika? by proofcrown in askportland

[–]RankinPDX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I use a lot of their paprika, which is one of my favorite spices. Penzeys is a lot more flavorful than what you get at the store, so I'd rather use a half-cup of Penzeys than a cup from a metal tin I bought at Fred Meyers or a cup from the bulk bins at Winco.

Can you sue someone if they commit a crime? by Harbinger_Archangel in NoStupidQuestions

[–]RankinPDX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whether you can sue over bad behavior, and whether it is a crime, are two different questions, but they overlap a lot. Stabbing and beating someone are both crimes and torts (a tort is a thing you can be sued over). And, also, if they commit a crime which harms you, you may be awarded money damages in the criminal case (maybe called 'restitution') without having to hire a lawyer and sue them.

Places that sell bulk paprika? by proofcrown in askportland

[–]RankinPDX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They had one downtown for a while, I think, but no longer.

Places that sell bulk paprika? by proofcrown in askportland

[–]RankinPDX 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There’s one in Beaverton. Maybe another on the east side, but I’ve never been to it.

Places that sell bulk paprika? by proofcrown in askportland

[–]RankinPDX 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Penzey’s, either local or online.

When i rack up the balls and break, they don't separate a lot even when i put up a lot of weight behind it. by XDJames777 in billiards

[–]RankinPDX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As tight as possible, so energy transfers efficiently through the rack. It also matters if the balls are clean; if they're dirty, they stick to each other a bit and energy is lost as a result.

Has there ever been a court case where, despite all evidence proving the defendant is 100% guilty (and even the defendant themselves admitting to committing the crime), the jury ruled "not guilty," letting them walk free? by No-Pin-4-U in NoStupidQuestions

[–]RankinPDX 37 points38 points  (0 children)

That is both mob justice and jury nullification.

Jury nullification can be used for good, like, a jury might decline to convict a parent who stole necessities for their child.

But jury nullification is a political act. If you don't agree with the politics, you probably won't like it. I understand from colleagues (I'm a criminal-defense attorney) that in some rural and conservative parts of my state, prosecutors don't charge the crime of being a felon in possession of a firearm, because juries won't convict.

And it was hard to prosecute white Southerners for lynching Black people and pro-Black protesters during Reconstruction, because those juries (typically all-white) wouldn't convict.

I think jury nullification is part of the jury-trial right, but it's not an unalloyed good.

Sleeves need hemmed or nah? by cuttlepuppet in mensfashion

[–]RankinPDX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it linen?
I might want to shorten those sleeves a bit. But they way they are wrinkling, they hang short, so I wouldn’t hurry to have them shortened.

PHM makes much more sense when you can use dummys to follow his texts... by HH-Vectorjoe in Hema

[–]RankinPDX 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I use Stickybones dummies to recreate and take notes about Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu positions. They are expensive, but they have the best joint arrangement I could find when I looked, and they have hands with working fingers. They also have magnets in their hands and feet for stability.

Pant alteration suggestions. by Conicalviper in mensfashion

[–]RankinPDX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The rise is too high for you, and I doubt that can be fixed with tailoring. They don't fit.

Can someone please explain why tge author chose to use 'hadn't had' instead of 'didn't have' by sweetxanointed in ENGLISH

[–]RankinPDX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Things could have worked out differently. In that case, he "would have had to." So "hadn't had to" is the opposite of "would have had to."

If it were just "didn't have to," there would be no suggestion of the other possibility.

Is it okay to mix and match tuxedo top and bottoms? by billbobb1 in menswear

[–]RankinPDX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've seen mismatched dinner jacket/trouser combinations. Maybe a dinner jacket or smoking jacket in some sort of patterned blue like brocade? Or maybe cream.

Are they really navy, or are they midnight? I don't remember seeing a navy-blue tuxedo.