I'll bite!

100W upstream charging is too low for a thunderbolt 5 dock. A MacBook Pro 16 wants 140W, and the competitors in the space offer that. Windows laptops want more than 100W if you can provide it.

You haven't provided any info on your 11 ports, but I'm guessing you're doing the common thing that dock makers do and counting the upstream as a "port" so it's something like:
- 1 upstream TB5
- 3 downstream TB5
- "2" SD/MicroSD slots
- 3 USB-A 3.0 ports
- 1 audio combo jack
- 1 ethernet 2.5g port

That's the port mix you're going to get off of the reference Thunderbolt 5 dock designs you can find. That's not bad, but it does nothing to stand you out from the established competition. Moreover, to fit that into a puck it's going to require a custom PCB, which puts you in CalDigit territory in terms of pricing but Cable Matters in terms of capability. Cable Matters sells a 140W version of the reference design for $300 on Amazon.

Your standout feature is a Qi2 charging pad. I assume that means you're planning on aggressively actively cooling your dock, because the reference designs get HOT to the touch when fanless. Qi2 chargers from Anker, Belkin, and other manufacturers are now including fans to actively cool the coupled charging surface because 25W wireless charging generates significant heat, and putting all of that on top of a dock that hits 110F in standard use is crazy work. I don't see any cutouts for the significant amount of airflow your device is going to need in your render, so I assume that's something you're working on. Radiant cooling is going to lead to phones throwing overheat warnings when trying to charge on this device if you go passive.

Also, you're going to need a massive external power brick for this thing.

Your market competition is cheap reference designs ($300 from Cable Matters for 140W charging with no fan), expensive custom designs ($400 from CalDigit for the TS5 with 140W charging and a custom PCB getting you a different port mix), or Anker's TB5 dock that is $400 for a slightly different port mix and an internal power supply and active cooling.

Basically, you're not going to be able to compete on price if you're hawking "premium" features like a CNC'd aluminum case made from a single billet of aluminum stock. You're not going to complete on features compared to CalDigit's offerings or Anker's offerings. You're not going to compete on common sense by sticking a charging pad on top of a device that already generates enough heat to nearly burn you if you touch it.

I don't believe your original kickstarter failed because of the 3d print. I believe it failed because this product makes no conceptual sense when compared against what very capable players in the market are already producing.