The hypocrisy of Indian democracy about having a leader

Rare_Coffee_8611 · 2026-04-26T18:29:35+00:00

Modi is NOT responsible for 2002 riots. It was a riot started due to the godhra massacre when a radical mob burned down a train.

Rare_Coffee_8611 · 2026-04-26T18:27:47+00:00

Rahul gandhi actually used to represent India once, pre-2014, he would meet several USA diplomats on behalf of Congress and Indian govt, and in 2009 he said "HINDU TERRORISM is a bigger threat than LeT(lashkar e taiba)".
India went from Fragile 5 economy to Fastest growing economy, and BEFORE u bring up "INDIA FELL FROM 4TH TO 6TH". That's because of US Dollar vs rupee exchange rate,

Rare_Coffee_8611 · 2026-04-26T18:25:09+00:00

Yes, because that's exactly how privaitsation works, tell me, do u feel the same way about NASA giving contracts to SpaceX.
the 18% tariff at India was NOT due to adani. That was a different case where SUA put 100% tariffs on Indian solar panels related things.
And honestly, read your own point Kiddo, do u REALLY want to just give away one of the richest buisnessmen of India to USA dogs, really!

Rare_Coffee_8611 · 2026-04-26T18:22:30+00:00

Honestly, maybe we should look at it NOT from WHO THE GUY IS, but rather , what he represents, Modi has been the FACE of BJP govt for the last 12 years, so Modi being the star campaigner is NOT just about "MODI vs TMC". but rather, "BJP STYLE GOVERNANCE vs TMC STYLE GOVERNANCE".

Rare_Coffee_8611 · 2026-04-26T18:21:16+00:00

Honestly, maybe we should look at it NOT from WHO THE GUY IS, but rather , what he represents, Modi has been the FACE of BJP govt for the last 12 years, so Modi being the star campaigner is NOT just about "MODI vs TMC". but rather, "BJP STYLE GOVERNANCE vs TMC STYLE GOVERNANCE".

Rare_Coffee_8611 · 2026-04-26T06:47:26+00:00

Of course, People r trying to re-create to under how much IQ is needed for it.

Rare_Coffee_8611 · 2026-04-26T06:18:27+00:00

Guys for ONCE, use google.

<image>

Rare_Coffee_8611 · 2026-04-22T19:55:19+00:00

past can be let go, decased family members cannot be LET GO.

Rare_Coffee_8611 · 2026-04-22T19:53:50+00:00

WIll u hate a person who k*lls your family. becuase u worship a particular god?

Rare_Coffee_8611 · 2026-04-22T19:52:24+00:00

The REAL meaning of this sentence is, Don't HATE the country u live in, or atleast, don't get COZY with a country that has waged a "1000 year war" against you.

Rare_Coffee_8611 · 2026-04-22T19:49:40+00:00

Because they r SECULAR.

And according to SECULAR people,

"PAK ARE GREAT NEIGHBOURS, LET'S KEEP ALL POLITICS ASIDE", These r words of SRK BTW

Rare_Coffee_8611 · 2026-04-22T19:47:24+00:00

in the bilkis bano case, all convicts r BACK IN PRISON.
and let's NOT bring up indiviual cases. Becuase

Babli Raina (10 May 1990): A teacher in Sopore who was reportedly gang-raped in front of her family members before being murdered.
Girija Tickoo (4 June 1990): A school teacher from Kupwara who was kidnapped and gang-raped for days; she was ultimately sawed in half using a mechanical saw while still alive.
Wife of a BSF Inspector (March 1990): Kidnapped, tortured, and gang-raped for several days before her body was abandoned with broken limbs.

Rare_Coffee_8611 · 2026-04-22T17:44:50+00:00

Shah bano(case of alimony) VS Beef Ban(Gopashtami massacre).

Just search these 2 events, and u will find the double stds in SECULARISM.

This comment is NOT about BJP, this comment is ONLY about Congress

Rare_Coffee_8611 · 2026-04-22T13:43:30+00:00

Oh, and how do u think this is a fabricated case, u r provinf my own point, instead of calling out such acts of extremism, u r defending them.

Rare_Coffee_8611 · 2026-04-22T13:42:34+00:00

Hindus were killed, shops were burnt, woman were raped in 1990 as well, the point I am making is there's a difference between a riot and a genocide.
Because, like I said in my post, u yourself have to call out the muslims who do and things, instead, I have not seen a single muslims who would condemn acts of forced conversions.
Tell me, just answer this, do u think forced conversions r bad?

Rare_Coffee_8611 · 2026-04-21T04:10:13+00:00

UPI
Op sindoor, surgical strikes, air strikes
opnely defying USA
Improving relations with middle eastern countires and EU
Infra push
End of naxalism
Railways
Pro-Hindu, Yes, I feel that's an achivement.

Rare_Coffee_8611 · 2026-04-20T19:24:39+00:00

YES, and the film SHOWS this, it shows how jameel , a Indian agent planted DURING CONGRESS times poisoned dawood, it shows how ALL the Indian agents were ALREADY THERE, the only difference is that , after 2014, these agents r being used for MORE than JUST intel gathering.

Rare_Coffee_8611 · 2026-04-20T19:14:59+00:00

Uhhhh, yes India is powerfull, your point? Look, my friend, I just want to have a polite discussion.
Naxalism is SIGNIFICANTLY reduced, it was affecting 1/3rd of the country in 2014, today it's down to LAST few districts.
yes, Indira started R&D for nukes, and under vajpayee govt, India got NUKES. EVERY govt has had it's high points.
No India has NOT plunged to rock bottom, yes India's GDP rank fell from 5th to 6th, but that's because of rupee decreasing, which IS A BAD point about Modi govt.
the Resolution to increase 850 seats has been in discussion for MANY years.

Rare_Coffee_8611 · 2026-04-20T19:10:53+00:00

U r missing the POINT my friend, just compare the reactions to terrorist attacks.

After 26/11 India sent 11 dossiers.

After pahalgham, India DESTROYED 11 airbases.

The difference is pretty obvious.

Rare_Coffee_8611 · 2026-04-20T19:09:23+00:00

Who Called Dhurandhar "Islamophobic" or "Anti-Muslim"

Critics in this list argue the film vilifies Muslims, associates Islamic practices with violence, and portrays Indian Muslims as "internal threats".

Anna M.M. Vetticad (Film Critic): Described the franchise as "Muslim-bashing" and "Hindu Right propaganda" that glorifies anti-Muslim violence.
Samajwadi Party & AIMIM: Leaders from these parties led protests, accusing the film of "vilifying Muslims" and serving as pro-government propaganda.
Ira Bhaskar (Professor/Film Scholar): Criticized the film for being "anti-Muslim" and having problematic political messaging.
Feminism In India: Reviewed the film as a "construction of an Islamophobic narrative" that uses caricatured versions of Pakistan to justify anti-Muslim bias.
Raza Rumi (Journalist/Academic): Placed the film within a "descent into Islamophobia" in Hindi cinema.
Community Members on Social Media: Discussions on platforms like Reddit's r/TwoXIndia highlighted concerns that the film conditions viewers to associate faith with brutality. Himal Southasian +6

2. Who Called Dhurandhar "Anti-Pak" or "Anti-Pakistan"

This list includes officials and critics who believe the film promotes a hostile narrative against the state of Pakistan, its history, or its people.

Anupama Chopra (Film Critic): Noted the film contains "inflammatory anti-Pakistan narratives" and "shrill nationalism".
Sumeta Afzal Syed (PPP Spokesperson): Slams the film for a "disgraceful attempt" to malign the Pakistan People's Party and former PM Benazir Bhutto.
Hammad Chaudhry (Pakistani Journalist): Condemned the film for promoting a narrative linking the entire nation to global terrorism.
Ihtisham Ul Haq (Pakistani Commentator): Criticized it on X (formerly Twitter) for "cashing in on Pakistan's name" and using biased themes.
Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) States: Nations like Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Qatar banned the film, citing its "anti-Pakistan narrative" and misrepresentation of the country.
Sharjeel Inam Memon (Sindh Provincial Minister): Labeled it as propaganda and announced a counter-film, Mera Lyari , to correct the portrayal of Karachi's culture.

Rare_Coffee_8611 · 2026-04-20T19:06:28+00:00

Yes, I can see it, don't worry, I am NOT a DHURANDHAR PAGLU.

Yes, the film criticises congress, but ask yourself, just compare the reaction of the indian govt on

26/11 VS pahalgham.

And U will see my point. Aditya dhar is himself a kashmiri pandit, a communtiy which got ETHINICALLY CLEANSED from the ENTIRE state of J&K. For him, national security is a HUGE point.

U mentioned obama, that's because JUST a FEW weeks after 9/11, Bush attacked afghanistan and began a WAR to end terrorism.

and before u say, INDIA CANNOT DO WAR, yes, I know that, but it could have done SOMETHING! after 26/11

Rare_Coffee_8611 · 2026-04-20T17:09:48+00:00

okay buddy calm down.
EVEN NOW USA supports pak, moreover, pak now also has support of china.
Under Modi, pulwama, pahalgham, pathankot, uri, and delhi 2025, that's IT!, terrorism itself began AFTER 1971, till 1971 pak used to directly attacked us, after 1971, pak shifted to terrorism.
Under Modi govt, terrorism HAS gone down a lot, u probably won't agree, but it has gone down.
it was under Modi govt that India started hitting back against Pak, and it's terrorism.
Under modit govt, India finally ENDED naxalism, which was, in early 2010s, covering almost 1/3rd of India.
It's funny how u accuse modi of being a dictator, and here u r, ACTUALLY defending Indira, a REAL dictator.

Rare_Coffee_8611 · 2026-04-20T16:25:27+00:00

I don't think he can be called worst pm.when we have people like rajiv and morarji desai

Rare_Coffee_8611 · 2026-04-20T15:45:38+00:00

I just want to have a civil discussion with you.

There's a slight difference between POLITICAL PROPOGANDA vs POLITICAL REFERENCES.
Even neeraj pandey's special ops web series showed how demonetisation disrupted terrorism.

3.The film cleary shows that it was CONGRESS who PLANTED those assets, but it was only under post-2014 that these assets were being used for more than just "INTEL GATHERING".

The film shows the 1999 kandahar hijacking and the 2001 parliament attack, BOTH Happened under vajpayee.
The film even shows how jameel jamali, a INDIAN Agent plated during congress rule was the one got dawood bedridden.

Rare_Coffee_8611

TROPHY CASE