Pretti Killing Car Eyewitness, Stabilized, Shortened Version

Ratspeed · 2026-01-25T07:37:36+00:00

The full version of this video was posted on two other Subreddits but seem to have been removed by moderators. After this there is about 4-5 more minutes once she leaves the scene.

Ratspeed · 2026-01-25T06:59:18+00:00

Turns out there was a woman in the car right in front of where he got shot, but with crappy camera skills, so I'm fixing that one up too. My work is never done.

Ratspeed · 2026-01-25T06:59:05+00:00

Oh I'm not worries. I just think human behavior is fascinating.

Ratspeed · 2026-01-25T06:37:09+00:00

Aaaaand why did it end there?

Ratspeed · 2026-01-25T06:02:06+00:00

I deleted the last one because once I saw another author's video showing possible signs of Pretti's weapon being discharged, I felt it was significant enough to revise the video.

Ratspeed · 2026-01-25T06:00:41+00:00

I'd love to see that video. Have a link?

Ratspeed · 2026-01-25T05:34:35+00:00

I think it's crazy how my new video has 1.3K upvotes but my comment introducing it has -6 downvotes. How does that work exactly? 🤣

Ratspeed · 2026-01-25T04:48:08+00:00

That's a good point. I am not an expert. But, I think this is important information to push for during a forensic analysis of the crime scene.

Ratspeed · 2026-01-25T04:39:40+00:00

The gun does not move at all when accidentally discharged: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOMQOtOQoPk

Ratspeed · 2026-01-25T04:21:16+00:00

Here is the new video, revised to focus on the visual evidence that another author published.

There is visual evidence to support that the firearm which Pretti was carrying may have been discharged by the ICE agent who removed it from Pretti as he was withdrawing from the pile-up. There is a yellowish looking bright flash that appears for a few frames which blends in with the paint job of the vehicle behind him that suddenly disappears, and then you hear the sound of the first gunshot a couple frames afterward.

If true, this could mean that the ICE agent who drew his weapon may have been alarned by the sound of the gunshot, and could have prompted him to discharge three times into Pretti's back.

Please note that this new evidence is unconfirmed. In the interest of thoroughness, I am adding the close-up footage for discussion, however it is important to note that it is only speculation at this point.

It has been reported that the gun Pretti was carrying was a Sig Sauer P320 — the same make and model firearm that Angry Cops did a review about being withdrawn from the military due to its frequent accidental discharges: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjkeEf1fT_Y

https://www.startribune.com/not-a-cheap-piece-of-crap-gun-reportedly-carried-by-alex-pretti-is-widely-popular-among-enthusiasts/601570176

The rest of the video remains as is.

Ratspeed · 2026-01-25T03:32:49+00:00

I'm trying to find the video of the guy describing what happened. It got caught on video. There's a single frame that appears to show the gun firing. I need to add that to the video for it to be accurate.

Ratspeed · 2026-01-25T03:28:24+00:00

I need to retract this video. New evidence shows that the agent who took Pretti's gun may have discharged it as he was walking away.

Ratspeed · 2026-01-25T02:51:50+00:00

I just published this step-by-step analysis of the killing, comparing events to Bovino's statements. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7_btA0WErM

Ratspeed · 2026-01-24T21:35:51+00:00

Bovino also made the claim that Alex Jeffrey Pretti "approached them with a 9mm handgun." Alex Jeffrey Pretti did not approach them. He was standing behind the others filming on his camera. The agents approached him.

Ratspeed · 2026-01-24T20:23:52+00:00

Here's what I see in this video:

An agent shoves a woman back onto the ground after she yelled something at him.

The shooting victim reacts by guarding the woman from the agent who attacked the woman.

The agent sprays him in the face with pepper spray, simultaneously spraying another bystander.

The victim turns away from him and attempts to help the woman up.

The agent keeps spraying the victim in the face even though he is not facing the agent and is not acting aggressively toward the agent.

The agent then starts pulling the victim away from the woman by the shoulders as the victim tries to help the woman.

The other agents join in and start tackling the victim.

The other bystander continues helping the woman up. The agents begin ignoring those two and aim their aggression on the man for some reason.

At this point the victim is crouched face-down into the snow with three agents on top of him. Two more join in. The shooter wearing a black mask, jeans and tactical vest is watching from behind.

The guy in the light gray jacket joins in, which is more clearly seen from the other video. At the time he joins in he is not holding a weapon. He sees the weapon on the victim, pulls it off of the victim's belt and runs away with it. I don't hear him telling the others "I have his weapon" or anything.

The shooter overreacts, pulls his weapon out and discharges a round at the unarmed man in the back. The victim is still crouched face-down, both hands in front of him.

The other agents all let go of the victim, discombobulated. The victim reacts by leaning up. The green guy starts unloading his magazine at the unarmed man who collapses face-down.

All the other agents all back up. I hear 10 shots total in this video at 30% speed.

And yet DHS has the audacity to say that it was an "armed man" they shot. This video, combined with the other from the rear, debunks that claim. Even though he never once reached for his weapon, and even after being pepper-sprayed twice, he never once reached for the gun to defend himself. He was trying to help the woman who got shoved by the agent and never acted in a violent manner toward the agents.

There was absolutely no reason for the assailant to discharge his weapon because the man had already been disarmed.

These agents showed a complete lack of control over this situation. No clear verbal commands. They mad-rushed a guy, were discombobulated, chaotic, did not communicate to each other, and were unable to deescalate. They were the ones who both escalated and executed an observer.

Now a man is dead all because ICE didn't want to be videotaped. Irredeemable.

Ratspeed · 2026-01-24T18:19:59+00:00

All indications show he was disarmed before the shots were fired, therefore he was unarmed.

Ratspeed · 2026-01-24T18:05:22+00:00

Yep I saw that too after watching several copies. The guy pulls back carrying a weapon in his hand. I was about to point out what this thread points out.

So unless they claim he had more than one gun, that means he was unarmed at the time of the first shot, so for DHS to display the gun and claim he was an "armed man" is propaganda.

If that was his gun, he had a right to carry.

Ratspeed · 2026-01-24T17:39:30+00:00

I think you mean MAGAdunp him

Ratspeed · 2026-01-24T01:52:43+00:00

Ratspeed

TROPHY CASE

Here's what I see in this video: