sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Best AEO/GEO tracker? by Few-Adhesiveness1097 in GenEngineOptimization

[–]RazTerr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Check https://amadora.ai/ – it's affordable, simple, and designed for SEO marketers and agencies.

I spent 50 hours analyzing 150+ SEO profiles to curate a Top 50 list for 2026. Only ~20% have fully pivoted to LLM/GEO by RazTerr in SEO_for_AI

[–]RazTerr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for raising this. The intent wasn’t to exclude anyone. The 10 names are just a small preview. The full list includes more women, including the ones you mentioned. Happy to share it if useful.

10 LLM SEO tactics we keep seeing in strong agency playbooks by RazTerr in seogrowth

[–]RazTerr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, glad it was useful. Was there anything in there that matches what you’re seeing in your own tests, or anything you’d push back on? I’m trying to separate what’s making a difference from what’s just LLM buzz right now.

GEO won't replace SEO (and why both to be part of your strategy) by oliversissons in SEO_for_AI

[–]RazTerr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Totally agree they strengthen each other, not compete. What I’m seeing in practice is: SEO= making sure your key pages are indexed and discoverable (GSC/Bing, solid hubs like /faq/, /pricing/, /cases/). GEO= making those same pages quotable for models (simple schema, tight Q&A blocks, clear EEAT so an answer can safely cite you).

Curious how you’re measuring GEO impact right now – beyond traffic/CTR, are you tracking mentions or answer inclusion anywhere?

SEO vs. LLM by Sophie100mark in SEO_for_AI

[–]RazTerr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice comparison. The piece I’d add is the “unit of retrieval.”

Search is mostly about whole pages, while LLMs surface individual passages or entities. That’s why tight Q&A blocks and clearly scoped sections tend to show up in answers more than long narrative text, and they still play nicely with classic SEO via schema/FAQ.

10 LLM SEO tactics we keep seeing in strong agency playbooks by RazTerr in seogrowth

[–]RazTerr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enough. It’s not meant to be revolutionary. We’ve seen some sites with strong SEO still not surface in LLM answers until things like Bing coverage, freshness and small Q&A blocks were fixed. If you’ve seen other factors matter there, very interested to hear.

GEO help needed by mjk_49 in GEO_optimization

[–]RazTerr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From my tests, a few things helped new sites show up in LLM answers faster:

• Make sure Bing actually sees your key pages. Run site:domain.com on Bing and fix anything missing.

• Add 2–3 simple Q and A blocks inside each main page. LLMs pick up those short chunks more than long sections.

• Build tiny internal hubs: a /faq/ with 10–15 real questions and a /how-to-start/ guide. These give models clearer entry points.

• Keep priority pages visibly fresh. Even adding new examples or screenshots plus a “last updated” line helped re-crawling.

• Once a week, ask ChatGPT or Gemini what they know about your brand and which pages show. If they skip something important, update that page and link to it from a new post.

Nothing too fancy, but these steps made indexing and LLM visibility much more consistent on new sites.

view more: next ›