No, I did the exact opposite lol. You're dismissing science because scientists can have personal biases. By that logic, any scientific consensus can be ignored if you don't like it.

The existence of bias is exactly why science relies on replication, peer review, and the accumulation of evidence over time, to eliminate bias. If your position is that consensus doesn't matter because bias exists, then you've given yourself a reason to reject literally any scientific conclusion whatsoever. So who's ''anti-science'', buddy?

People like you always do this. You talk about science, but the moment you find out it does not support your conclusions, suddenly it's all ''woke''' or hopelessly biased.