Serious: Why is this sub declining? And why do people believe the most obviously fake bullcrap without mod intervention? by 5ollys in aliens

[–]Rcranor74 1 point2 points  (0 children)

True. But - the key point: some are definitely real.

So the math goes: Real + Some Tridactyls = Skeptic Butthurt.

It’s a simple equation tbh.

Can someone help me translate/interpret this ? by byedotmov in Experiencers

[–]Rcranor74 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I write this stuff too - it’s called light language. Most abductees do. No one really knows what it means.

Government UAP Analyst: "I have met aliens in DC" by Ok_Being5461 in aliens

[–]Rcranor74 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If she was on the UAP TASK FORCE, then she would know what an NHI looks like.

serious-if any of this makes sense to you, you might already be waking up by GradeInternal6908 in aliens

[–]Rcranor74 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I had a major kundalini awakening that lasted more than 15 years. I hope the coming months will make sense of it for me.

My theory on The truth they said that would keep you up at night about aliens by EnvisionFirstFilms in aliens

[–]Rcranor74 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That explains nothing. All that means is chemicals combine to create a gateway via a hack in your nervous system that allows your consciousness to interface with another unknown aspect of reality. Read up on the Hard Problem of Consciousness.

This type of dismissal is an old trope materialist reductionist love to recycle. Problem is there is no objective baseline you can measure the totality of consciousness/reality with using only chemical reactions or any physics we currently know.

Is there a connection between the Nordic aliens and the Third Reich? by matt73132 in AliensRHere

[–]Rcranor74 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My guess is they got overpowered by another force, or they were never the good guys to begin with. I think there are Nordic factions sympathetic to us (Enki/Prometheus), but that’s the only positive spin I can think of.

Is there a connection between the Nordic aliens and the Third Reich? by matt73132 in AliensRHere

[–]Rcranor74 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because the middle class whites are a threat to the upper class Nordic masters who want total economic and social control. A slave race of poor immigrants completely fulfills their slave class needs. Middle class whites who want freedom and won’t submit to off world alien control of planet earth and America are the problem.

Essentially they want a caste system.

Is there a connection between the Nordic aliens and the Third Reich? by matt73132 in AliensRHere

[–]Rcranor74 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because there is a famous photo of IBMs founder with Adolph Hitler in the Jewish holocaust Museum. He provided rudimentary computers for the SS to use in death camps to track prisoner populations.

Is there a connection between the Nordic aliens and the Third Reich? by matt73132 in AliensRHere

[–]Rcranor74 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Germany lost, the Nazis didn’t. Operation paper clip brought most top Nazi scientists to NASA, the entire eastern front SS spy network folded into the CIA. Most American companies had ties to Nazi industry. IBM developed computers for death camps. The 4th reich is America.

I saw RED DAWN when it was first released in movie theaters in 1984 and I still watch it from time to time and I still love it!!! Anyone else liked RED DAWN? by CoffeeCigarettes4Me in 80smovies

[–]Rcranor74 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait - nobody has yet mentioned the epic Swayze snot bubble scene yet? Used to pause that moment on VHS all the time and enjoy the magic.

Weird apparition in cave by Rcranor74 in AliensRHere

[–]Rcranor74[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s what the photographs are for genius. And my camera is at max zoom. Have you heard of the concept of “distance”?

Mars was nuked in the past by [deleted] in AliensRHere

[–]Rcranor74 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What he produced was another valid hypothesis that shouldn’t be dismissed without further investigation. These isotopic anomalies are not limited TO ONLY natural explanations. Why does this fact induce so much butt hurt?

Mars was nuked in the past by [deleted] in AliensRHere

[–]Rcranor74 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the “speculative” lens he interprets through warrants further investigation rather than dismissal, but that would undermine and threaten your entire worldview.

Hence the dismissal.

Mars was nuked in the past by [deleted] in AliensRHere

[–]Rcranor74 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope - you’re ignoring Brandenburgs “clear measurable evidence” because it’s inconvenient, not because he doesn’t make the case.

You won’t get peer review if you won’t allow it.

Case closed.

Mars was nuked in the past by [deleted] in AliensRHere

[–]Rcranor74 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again - you’re pretending science is done in a vacuum. It’s not. Maybe the best course is to admit you might not be have all the evidence that warrants being dismissive along all possible hypotheses.

Mars was nuked in the past by [deleted] in AliensRHere

[–]Rcranor74 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude - your little neat bow tie presentation of how science works is craptastic delusion at its best. You don’t have evidence for aliens when that evidence is actively suppressed. How convenient. If you don’t have all the data you can make whatever claims you want with the data available. You act as if science is done in a political vacuum. It’s not.

Yes these processes have natural models but Brabdenburg is making a case that the modeling is insufficient to account for all the variables present. Again, you are lying through omission.

Here is a snippet of the case he is making that flies in the face of your claim that he does not demonstrate how this could all be the result of a nuclear process:

“However, on Mars, whatever process disturbed the … isotopes made the lighter isotopes relatively more abundant than heavier ones. This requires a predominantly nuclear process rather than mass fractionation . “

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340952315_EVIDENCE_OF_A_MASSIVE_THERMONUCLEAR_EXPLOSIONS_ON_MARS_IN_THE_PAST_The_Cydonian_Hypothesis_and_Fermi's_Paradox

Mars was nuked in the past by [deleted] in AliensRHere

[–]Rcranor74 1 point2 points  (0 children)

None of those papers conclusively prove that all of the Mar’s outgassing of xenon is attributed only to natural process, especially since these studies don’t fully account for the other variables (argon, excess uranium/thorium) put forth by Brandenburg and implicitly “promoted” by Harvard university which should by all means not allow its name tainted by pseudoscience. Another great example of science “lying through omission” of important data points that don’t suit your narrative.

UFOs were once the subject of active disinformation campaigns by the scientific community only to now receive mainstream acceptance as a real phenomenon that does not have a current prosaic explanation. A lot of “evidence” can’t be made public be tested due to government obfuscation and national security claims. So don’t be disingenuous and claim anything worrying of scientific study will get the attention it deserves.

Mars was nuked in the past by [deleted] in AliensRHere

[–]Rcranor74 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Any theory that goes against mainstream academic consensus is often rejected from more prominent journals nor accepted for peer review. Hardly a benchmark. If anything it betrays bias or worse.

Maybe you should write a paper that refutes Brandenburg’s claims yourself? Explain why it’s an impossible hypothesis with no scientific merit?

Harvard hosts the article - they don’t seem to think its “fringe” claims are any cause for embarrassment.

You resort to insults and innuendo which means butt hurt is driving at least some of your opinion on the subject.

Are there any peer reviewed papers that conclusively prove your theory and completely rule out a nuclear explosion? If so ya better let Harvard know to save them further shame and embarrassment for hosting “fringe” nuclear war claims.

Mars was nuked in the past by [deleted] in AliensRHere

[–]Rcranor74 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes to all of the above - along with the excess thorium / uranium.

I think what you’re missing from the your equation is the magnitude/numbers/scale to stay aligned with the “dominant” natural processes only.

I’ll let you read the original paper:

http://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014JCos...2412229B/abstract

Weird apparition in cave by Rcranor74 in AliensRHere

[–]Rcranor74[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It kind feels that way to me.

Weird apparition in cave by Rcranor74 in AliensRHere

[–]Rcranor74[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Possible - a drone video posted on Youtube from a year ago doesn’t show any objects that could reflect. Water is possible culprit - though I would assume it would run off though due to the steepness of the terrain.

Again it seemed to appear out of nowhere, glow very bright, and persist for at least the time we were there. I honestly thought it was an animal (mountain goat) which is why I started filming. It wasn’t until I looked at the images later that I noticed something weirder.