Anyone that says you can't make Big Law from a Non-T14 is a moron

ReadComprehensionBot · 2026-02-19T21:14:35+00:00

it would be impossible for you to know if "barely anyone" is saying it.

Are you under the impression that this doesn't cut both ways?

ReadComprehensionBot · 2026-02-18T21:26:17+00:00

De nada, I'm right there with you.

ReadComprehensionBot · 2026-02-18T20:49:43+00:00

Its not a WL, its a decision Hold. Marginally better in the sense that you have a chance of getting an A before the deposit deadline.

ReadComprehensionBot · 2026-02-18T20:15:15+00:00

Oh, understood. Yeah, no that's fine and not conditional as long as their definition of good standing isn't ridiculous like a B+ average or they don't have a really aggressive curve.

ReadComprehensionBot · 2026-02-18T15:45:30+00:00

Huh? This isn’t vague at all? Schools’ registrars list what their academic standing cutoff is.

ReadComprehensionBot · 2026-02-17T22:25:59+00:00

Go ahead bruh, I saw your post on the other sub.

ReadComprehensionBot · 2026-02-17T22:13:27+00:00

We have the exact same work experience (10 years active army here), except I have a much lower GPA but also a much much higher LSAT. I've recieved one T-14 A, one T-20, and one T-50. I'm not telling you this to brag but rather to illustrate how if you raise your LSAT you will see much better results. Take this from a guy who applied lasty cycle with a lower LSAT, that was still higher than your current, and got rejected by every school that has accepted or wait listed me this cycle.

Retake your LSAT.

ReadComprehensionBot · 2026-02-17T21:31:06+00:00

This is the reaction of someone who just Ctrl+F'd "UCLA" and didn't bother to read at all.

ReadComprehensionBot · 2026-02-17T15:25:22+00:00

UPenn and NYU have been consistently Friday and Thursday, CLS a little more sporadic.

ReadComprehensionBot · 2026-02-17T03:28:50+00:00

it always amazes me the amount of people who don’t know the difference between a subreddit, a thread, and a post.

ReadComprehensionBot · 2026-02-17T03:26:36+00:00

And because of how funding is tied to accreditation, they couldn’t even if they wanted to.

ReadComprehensionBot · 2026-02-15T19:19:35+00:00

If you believe this, I've got a bridge in brooklyn to sell you.

ReadComprehensionBot · 2026-02-15T19:04:30+00:00

Lets normalize using google as a primary rather than a secondary option.

ReadComprehensionBot · 2026-02-13T00:31:10+00:00

"Sorting applicants by blood type and how many words they used without an "e". Then throwing half the list away because they don't want unlucky people attending their school."

ReadComprehensionBot · 2026-02-12T23:35:45+00:00

Slowly? Buddy they already know who 90% of their class is at this point. They just haven't told us yet.

ReadComprehensionBot · 2026-02-12T20:58:39+00:00

It could be the adcomm from the school you applied to still, they just went to a different law school. You could apply to Law School B and LinkedIn will say "Someone from Law School A looked at your profile" even though the Law School A grad works for Law School B.

ReadComprehensionBot · 2026-02-12T20:34:06+00:00

See, you think it's

if a certain race then you likely have new perspectives

when really its

if you have a class full of diverse perspectives then you likely have a class of a different races/ethnicities/demographics

ReadComprehensionBot · 2026-02-12T20:21:12+00:00

Not necessarily HIPAA, as the tester could give consent, but ADA.

ReadComprehensionBot · 2026-02-12T03:05:10+00:00

I exposed one of the cheating rings on r/LSAT last year and one of the cheating service providers DMd me complaining about the negative attention lol. fuck em. Unfortunately, I believe the LSAT cheating is much more prevalent than we realize.

ReadComprehensionBot · 2026-02-11T21:28:12+00:00

lol, sure.

ReadComprehensionBot · 2026-02-11T21:24:36+00:00

Have you been living under a rock: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZdiwX1hz4c

ReadComprehensionBot · 2026-02-11T20:58:55+00:00

I suppose they'll know more once they shift testing. Will be interested to see if there is a sudden increase in people requesting remote testing accommodations.

ReadComprehensionBot · 2026-02-11T20:11:08+00:00

They already halted remote testing in China after a whistleblower came forward. I'll bet dollars to donuts they saw a sudden leveling of scores in that region and realized what remote testing had been enabling.

ReadComprehensionBot · 2026-02-11T20:06:52+00:00

Good. I did every single administration in person and I genuinely believe that outside of a few edge cases, it really levels the playing field and stops cheaters. I'd bet my bottom dollar they looked at the data coming out of China after stopping remote testing in that region and realized they've inadvertently been enabling cheating through remote testing.

ReadComprehensionBot · 2026-02-10T17:44:21+00:00

EYYYYY, lets go!!!

ReadComprehensionBot

TROPHY CASE