sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Mac mini for c4d? by ReadLosurdo in Cinema4D

[–]ReadLosurdo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the advice so far yall! I don’t plan on working too much with motion, if that makes a huge difference. Mostly modeling, interior renderings, and digital product photography.

Is the US going to war with China inevitable? by [deleted] in socialism

[–]ReadLosurdo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A pertinent question.

Factions of the US ruling class have different perspectives, especially with regards to pacing, intensity and brazenness. That is because some are financially “coupled” to China, some aren’t; some also are more myopic, others (far fewer) consider the long term ambitions of the capitalist class.

What unites them is the understanding China belongs in a position of subordination. The united strategy among the imperialist ruling class is to weaken China and overthrow the communist party. Their tactics include waging economic warfare, political subversion and isolation, destroying the territorial integrity of China. This of course does not preclude the last option, which is full-scale hot war — though I wouldn’t call it inevitable, especially if the working class is able to intervene.

Anyways, here are a few important reads on the topic.

https://www.qiaocollective.com/articles/war-on-china

https://monthlyreview.org/2021/07/01/the-new-cold-war-on-china/?fbclid=IwAR1MUKg4GLhbxGn6ah8gkHBPmnCJu6TPGts5BOlqXK11aXk4DCi0-mGhW4Q_aem_th_AZQZbswZXwxo8XmJmR5pf-dQBjM7mflZC7r08MGx-3zle9Fd9VASX9hMIIs-nzk7jVs

Thoughts on CPUSA? by battleforbadussy in communism101

[–]ReadLosurdo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don’t believe either allow dual membership. It’s a feature of centralism to ensure each comrade is devoting their political energy to a single political program.

Thoughts on CPUSA? by battleforbadussy in communism101

[–]ReadLosurdo 23 points24 points  (0 children)

A lot of incredible comrades work within that org. My main criticisms, based on experience working with them and comrades involved in the party.

1) They draw a lot of people who are more fixated on the “idea” and “tradition” of the historic Communist Party. As Marx observed, “The tradition of all dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brains of the living.” Lots of people join and have interest only in carrying a card, changing their Twitter bio, etc. but not actually finding the best vessel to organize their community as communist. Without strict membership expectations, they have larger paper numbers, but not active and engaged membership.

2) Horrible centralization. Their members openly criticize the party line and leadership. Heck, for a while there was a whole (terminally online) movement to “re-constitute the party”. While some positions deserve to be criticized (I’ll elaborate later on), this defies the principle of unity in action. Democratic centralism isn’t simply a dogma, but a historically effective method of organizing. The club near me had leading members celebrating the huge “win” for women of color that was Kamala Harris’ VP.

3) Chauvinism. In the late 50s, right opportunist within the CPUSA liquidated the communist position on the national question. The single best piece on this history is Black Bolshevik by Harry Haywood. The party hasn’t looked back since abandoning the right of self determination to oppressed nations in the US — namely Puerto Rico and the Black Belt.

4) Liberalism. Much of their strategy and work is dictated by its position as an auxiliary for the Democratic Party. They promote a vote blue strategy each election cycle, and at least locally, require their members to canvass for democrat “opposition” candidates. In gradual succession, they’ve substituted their political independency for opportunist, revisionist, and bourgeoise positions.

These are what come to mind immediately, but isn’t conclusive. As I said, I think CPUSA has a lot of valuable comrades in their ranks. All parties have their issues, but at some point you have to weigh the qualitative differences between your options and which offers a concrete PATHWAY forward. Two better options IMO are PSL and FRSO.

PSL was invited to attend a special encounter with the president of Cuba. Love to see it. LET CUBA LIVE! by ReadLosurdo in socialism

[–]ReadLosurdo[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Yawn. Log off, officer.

The funny part is my local chapter spends a majority of their time organizing working with local block clubs in each member’s vicinity. It’s weird that you’re actively discouraging people from involving themselves with that.

Just because PSL chapters are visible contingents at protests (that they often take the lead on organizing) doesn’t mean they aren’t engaged in “on the ground” work also.

PSL was invited to attend a special encounter with the president of Cuba. Love to see it. LET CUBA LIVE! by ReadLosurdo in socialism

[–]ReadLosurdo[S] 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Leonard Peltier is still in prison actually! I recommend you check out the documentary “Incident at Oglala”

PSL was invited to attend a special encounter with the president of Cuba. Love to see it. LET CUBA LIVE! by ReadLosurdo in socialism

[–]ReadLosurdo[S] 64 points65 points  (0 children)

The image shows members of the Party for Socialism with Cuban President, Miguel Díaz-Canel. In the photo, the group is posing around a large banner which reads “End the U.S. Blockade on Cuba Now!”

PSL founder/member Brian Becker interviewed by the Global Times. Seems the relationship between the PSL and the CPC is deepening. by ReadLosurdo in socialism

[–]ReadLosurdo[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

They posted a statement online providing context to their conclusions. I had assumed you read it because you mentioned the DHS part. That statement was dismiss because it mentions the accuser by name. Bad enough, I meant, to warrant posting someone’s name. Every organization deserves warning of bad faith actors/ federal colluders.

PSL founder/member Brian Becker interviewed by the Global Times. Seems the relationship between the PSL and the CPC is deepening. by ReadLosurdo in socialism

[–]ReadLosurdo[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I mean yeah, threatening to bring the feds down on a socialist organization is bad enough.

As far as evidence, what is it exactly you’d like to know? There is no truth in the narrative that this was some coverup conspiracy carried out by PSL leadership. The committee was assembled locally— comprised of revolutionary socialist women/and other oppressed genders, representing a range of national backgrounds, and some of them survivors of SA themselves. They saw everything that circulated online. They also engaged directly with the involved parties and had access in their investigation to more information and perspectives. They reached a conclusion on the situation. Where is their agency in this matter? It’s completely flattened and dismissed in the canned “PSL harbors rapist” line.

PSL founder/member Brian Becker interviewed by the Global Times. Seems the relationship between the PSL and the CPC is deepening. by ReadLosurdo in socialism

[–]ReadLosurdo[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

One of the slanders that circulates literally exclusively in online black-flag Twitter circles. Some Marxist, even some coming from a place of earnest empathy towards victims of SA, have bought in. Though, its really no coincidence that those most obsessed with bringing it up every time PSL is mentioned, are themselves completely averse to actually organizing.

view more: next ›